Solving 1D non‐linear magneto quasi‐static Maxwell's equations using neural networks

Abstract Electromagnetics (EM) can be described, together with the constitutive laws, by four PDEs, called Maxwell's equations. “Quasi‐static” approximations emerge from neglecting particular couplings of electric and magnetic field related quantities. In case of slowly time varying fields, if...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marco Baldan, Giacomo Baldan, Bernard Nacke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-03-01
Series:IET Science, Measurement & Technology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1049/smt2.12022
id doaj-b04739b2521d4331b48b01f7cfa0e767
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b04739b2521d4331b48b01f7cfa0e7672021-08-02T08:30:05ZengWileyIET Science, Measurement & Technology1751-88221751-88302021-03-0115220421710.1049/smt2.12022Solving 1D non‐linear magneto quasi‐static Maxwell's equations using neural networksMarco Baldan0Giacomo Baldan1Bernard Nacke2Institute of Electrotechnology Leibniz Universität Hannover Hanover GermanyDepartment of Aerospace Engineering Politecnico di Milano Milan ItalyInstitute of Electrotechnology Leibniz Universität Hannover Hanover GermanyAbstract Electromagnetics (EM) can be described, together with the constitutive laws, by four PDEs, called Maxwell's equations. “Quasi‐static” approximations emerge from neglecting particular couplings of electric and magnetic field related quantities. In case of slowly time varying fields, if inductive and resistive effects have to be considered, whereas capacitive effects can be neglected, the magneto quasi‐static (MQS) approximation applies. The solution of the MQS Maxwell's equations, traditionally obtained with finite differences and elements methods, is crucial in modelling EM devices. In this paper, the applicability of an unsupervised deep learning model is studied in order to solve MQS Maxwell's equations, in both frequency and time domain. In this framework, a straightforward way to model hysteretic and anhysteretic non‐linearity is shown. The introduced technique is used for the field analysis in the place of the classical finite elements in two applications: on the one hand, the B–H curve inverse determination of AISI 4140, on the other, the simulation of an induction heating process. Finally, since many of the commercial FEM packages do not allow modelling hysteresis, it is shown how the present approach could be further adopted for the inverse magnetic properties identification of new magnetic flux concentrators for induction applications.https://doi.org/10.1049/smt2.12022
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marco Baldan
Giacomo Baldan
Bernard Nacke
spellingShingle Marco Baldan
Giacomo Baldan
Bernard Nacke
Solving 1D non‐linear magneto quasi‐static Maxwell's equations using neural networks
IET Science, Measurement & Technology
author_facet Marco Baldan
Giacomo Baldan
Bernard Nacke
author_sort Marco Baldan
title Solving 1D non‐linear magneto quasi‐static Maxwell's equations using neural networks
title_short Solving 1D non‐linear magneto quasi‐static Maxwell's equations using neural networks
title_full Solving 1D non‐linear magneto quasi‐static Maxwell's equations using neural networks
title_fullStr Solving 1D non‐linear magneto quasi‐static Maxwell's equations using neural networks
title_full_unstemmed Solving 1D non‐linear magneto quasi‐static Maxwell's equations using neural networks
title_sort solving 1d non‐linear magneto quasi‐static maxwell's equations using neural networks
publisher Wiley
series IET Science, Measurement & Technology
issn 1751-8822
1751-8830
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Abstract Electromagnetics (EM) can be described, together with the constitutive laws, by four PDEs, called Maxwell's equations. “Quasi‐static” approximations emerge from neglecting particular couplings of electric and magnetic field related quantities. In case of slowly time varying fields, if inductive and resistive effects have to be considered, whereas capacitive effects can be neglected, the magneto quasi‐static (MQS) approximation applies. The solution of the MQS Maxwell's equations, traditionally obtained with finite differences and elements methods, is crucial in modelling EM devices. In this paper, the applicability of an unsupervised deep learning model is studied in order to solve MQS Maxwell's equations, in both frequency and time domain. In this framework, a straightforward way to model hysteretic and anhysteretic non‐linearity is shown. The introduced technique is used for the field analysis in the place of the classical finite elements in two applications: on the one hand, the B–H curve inverse determination of AISI 4140, on the other, the simulation of an induction heating process. Finally, since many of the commercial FEM packages do not allow modelling hysteresis, it is shown how the present approach could be further adopted for the inverse magnetic properties identification of new magnetic flux concentrators for induction applications.
url https://doi.org/10.1049/smt2.12022
work_keys_str_mv AT marcobaldan solving1dnonlinearmagnetoquasistaticmaxwellsequationsusingneuralnetworks
AT giacomobaldan solving1dnonlinearmagnetoquasistaticmaxwellsequationsusingneuralnetworks
AT bernardnacke solving1dnonlinearmagnetoquasistaticmaxwellsequationsusingneuralnetworks
_version_ 1721238184380071936