The “Pelvic Harness”: a skeletonized mesh implant for safe pelvic floor reconstruction

ABSTRACT Objectives To evaluate the feasibility, safety and surgical results of skeletonized mesh implants to form a pelvic harness for pelvic floor reconstruction surgery. Study design Patients with advanced pelvic floor prolapse were enrolled to this study. Study model was a kit mesh, reduced...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sumerova Natalia, Neuman Menahem, Krissi Haim, Pushkar Dmitri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2016-06-01
Series:International Brazilian Journal of Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382016000300507&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-b04645025cf04ef0b1b0775fcc88e956
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b04645025cf04ef0b1b0775fcc88e9562020-11-24T21:29:44ZengSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational Brazilian Journal of Urology1677-61192016-06-0142350751310.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0177S1677-55382016000300507The “Pelvic Harness”: a skeletonized mesh implant for safe pelvic floor reconstructionSumerova NataliaNeuman MenahemKrissi HaimPushkar DmitriABSTRACT Objectives To evaluate the feasibility, safety and surgical results of skeletonized mesh implants to form a pelvic harness for pelvic floor reconstruction surgery. Study design Patients with advanced pelvic floor prolapse were enrolled to this study. Study model was a kit mesh, reduced to 75% of the original surface area by cutting out mesh material from the central mesh body. Patients were evaluated at the end of the 1st and 6th post-operative months and interviewed at the study conclusion. Results Ninety-five women with advanced pelvic floor prolapse had this implant. Mean follow-up duration was 9 months (6-12 months). The POP-Q point’s measurements showed marked and statistically significant improvements. Bladder over-activity symptoms, fecal incontinence, pelvic pain and constipation rates were all reduced as well. No adverse effects related to the dissection or mesh implantation were marked. The first and sixth post-operative month follow-up records as well as the study conclusion interview findings were satisfactory in terms of subjective and objective cure and adverse effects occurrence. Conclusion This study data proposes that skeletonizing meshes might be safely and successfully implanted for potentially improved pelvic floor reconstruction.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382016000300507&lng=en&tlng=enReconstructive Surgical ProceduresGeneral SurgeryPelvic Floor Disorders
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sumerova Natalia
Neuman Menahem
Krissi Haim
Pushkar Dmitri
spellingShingle Sumerova Natalia
Neuman Menahem
Krissi Haim
Pushkar Dmitri
The “Pelvic Harness”: a skeletonized mesh implant for safe pelvic floor reconstruction
International Brazilian Journal of Urology
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
General Surgery
Pelvic Floor Disorders
author_facet Sumerova Natalia
Neuman Menahem
Krissi Haim
Pushkar Dmitri
author_sort Sumerova Natalia
title The “Pelvic Harness”: a skeletonized mesh implant for safe pelvic floor reconstruction
title_short The “Pelvic Harness”: a skeletonized mesh implant for safe pelvic floor reconstruction
title_full The “Pelvic Harness”: a skeletonized mesh implant for safe pelvic floor reconstruction
title_fullStr The “Pelvic Harness”: a skeletonized mesh implant for safe pelvic floor reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed The “Pelvic Harness”: a skeletonized mesh implant for safe pelvic floor reconstruction
title_sort “pelvic harness”: a skeletonized mesh implant for safe pelvic floor reconstruction
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
series International Brazilian Journal of Urology
issn 1677-6119
publishDate 2016-06-01
description ABSTRACT Objectives To evaluate the feasibility, safety and surgical results of skeletonized mesh implants to form a pelvic harness for pelvic floor reconstruction surgery. Study design Patients with advanced pelvic floor prolapse were enrolled to this study. Study model was a kit mesh, reduced to 75% of the original surface area by cutting out mesh material from the central mesh body. Patients were evaluated at the end of the 1st and 6th post-operative months and interviewed at the study conclusion. Results Ninety-five women with advanced pelvic floor prolapse had this implant. Mean follow-up duration was 9 months (6-12 months). The POP-Q point’s measurements showed marked and statistically significant improvements. Bladder over-activity symptoms, fecal incontinence, pelvic pain and constipation rates were all reduced as well. No adverse effects related to the dissection or mesh implantation were marked. The first and sixth post-operative month follow-up records as well as the study conclusion interview findings were satisfactory in terms of subjective and objective cure and adverse effects occurrence. Conclusion This study data proposes that skeletonizing meshes might be safely and successfully implanted for potentially improved pelvic floor reconstruction.
topic Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
General Surgery
Pelvic Floor Disorders
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382016000300507&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT sumerovanatalia thepelvicharnessaskeletonizedmeshimplantforsafepelvicfloorreconstruction
AT neumanmenahem thepelvicharnessaskeletonizedmeshimplantforsafepelvicfloorreconstruction
AT krissihaim thepelvicharnessaskeletonizedmeshimplantforsafepelvicfloorreconstruction
AT pushkardmitri thepelvicharnessaskeletonizedmeshimplantforsafepelvicfloorreconstruction
AT sumerovanatalia pelvicharnessaskeletonizedmeshimplantforsafepelvicfloorreconstruction
AT neumanmenahem pelvicharnessaskeletonizedmeshimplantforsafepelvicfloorreconstruction
AT krissihaim pelvicharnessaskeletonizedmeshimplantforsafepelvicfloorreconstruction
AT pushkardmitri pelvicharnessaskeletonizedmeshimplantforsafepelvicfloorreconstruction
_version_ 1725965941626372096