Code Status Documentation Availability and Accuracy Among Emergency Patients with End-stage Disease

Introduction: Some patients with end-stage disease who may neither want nor benefit from aggressive resuscitation receive such treatment if they cannot communicate in an emergency. Timely access to patients’ current resuscitation wishes, or “code status,” should be a key metric of electronic health...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Evan Russell, Andrew K. Hall, Conor McKaigney, Craig Goldie, Ingrid Harle, Marco L.A. Sivilotti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eScholarship Publishing, University of California 2021-05-01
Series:Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Online Access:https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4vv609cp
id doaj-b03d899ab6da4b92894886fdd060ca53
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b03d899ab6da4b92894886fdd060ca532021-06-14T14:49:07ZengeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine1936-90182021-05-0122310.5811/westjem.2020.12.46801wjem-22-628Code Status Documentation Availability and Accuracy Among Emergency Patients with End-stage DiseaseEvan Russell0Andrew K. Hall1Conor McKaigney2Craig Goldie3Ingrid Harle4Marco L.A. Sivilotti5Queen’s University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Kingston, Ontario, CanadaQueen’s University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Kingston, Ontario, CanadaUniversity of Calgary, Department of Emergency Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaQueen’s University, Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, Kingston, Ontario, CanadaQueen’s University, Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, Kingston, Ontario, CanadaQueen’s University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Kingston, Ontario, CanadaIntroduction: Some patients with end-stage disease who may neither want nor benefit from aggressive resuscitation receive such treatment if they cannot communicate in an emergency. Timely access to patients’ current resuscitation wishes, or “code status,” should be a key metric of electronic health records (EHR). We sought to determine what percentage of a cohort of patients with end-stage disease who present to the emergency department (ED) have accessible, code status documents, and for those who do, how quickly can this documentation be retrieved. Methods: In this cross-sectional study of ED patients with end-stage disease (eg, palliative care, metastatic malignancy, home oxygen, dialysis) conducted during purposefully sampled random accrual times we performed a standardized, timed review of available health records, including accompanying transfer documents. We also interviewed consenting patients and substitute decision makers to compare available code status documents to their current wishes. Results: Code status documentation was unavailable within 15 minutes of ED arrival in most cases (54/85, or 63%). Retrieval time was under five minutes in the rest, especially when “one click deep” in the EHR. When interviewed, 20/32 (63%) expressed “do not resuscitate” wishes, 10 of whom had no supporting documentation. Patients from assisted-living (odds ratio [OR] 6.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7–26) and long-term care facilities (OR 13; 95% CI, 2.5–65) were more likely to have a documented code status available compared to those living in the community. Conclusion: The majority of patients with end-stage disease, including half of those who would not wish resuscitation from cardiorespiratory arrest, did not have code status documents readily available upon arrival to our tertiary care ED. Patients living in the community with advanced disease may be at higher risk for unwanted resuscitative efforts should they present to hospital in extremis. While easily retrievable code status documentation within the EHR shows promise, its accuracy and validity remain important considerations.https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4vv609cp
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Evan Russell
Andrew K. Hall
Conor McKaigney
Craig Goldie
Ingrid Harle
Marco L.A. Sivilotti
spellingShingle Evan Russell
Andrew K. Hall
Conor McKaigney
Craig Goldie
Ingrid Harle
Marco L.A. Sivilotti
Code Status Documentation Availability and Accuracy Among Emergency Patients with End-stage Disease
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
author_facet Evan Russell
Andrew K. Hall
Conor McKaigney
Craig Goldie
Ingrid Harle
Marco L.A. Sivilotti
author_sort Evan Russell
title Code Status Documentation Availability and Accuracy Among Emergency Patients with End-stage Disease
title_short Code Status Documentation Availability and Accuracy Among Emergency Patients with End-stage Disease
title_full Code Status Documentation Availability and Accuracy Among Emergency Patients with End-stage Disease
title_fullStr Code Status Documentation Availability and Accuracy Among Emergency Patients with End-stage Disease
title_full_unstemmed Code Status Documentation Availability and Accuracy Among Emergency Patients with End-stage Disease
title_sort code status documentation availability and accuracy among emergency patients with end-stage disease
publisher eScholarship Publishing, University of California
series Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
issn 1936-9018
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Introduction: Some patients with end-stage disease who may neither want nor benefit from aggressive resuscitation receive such treatment if they cannot communicate in an emergency. Timely access to patients’ current resuscitation wishes, or “code status,” should be a key metric of electronic health records (EHR). We sought to determine what percentage of a cohort of patients with end-stage disease who present to the emergency department (ED) have accessible, code status documents, and for those who do, how quickly can this documentation be retrieved. Methods: In this cross-sectional study of ED patients with end-stage disease (eg, palliative care, metastatic malignancy, home oxygen, dialysis) conducted during purposefully sampled random accrual times we performed a standardized, timed review of available health records, including accompanying transfer documents. We also interviewed consenting patients and substitute decision makers to compare available code status documents to their current wishes. Results: Code status documentation was unavailable within 15 minutes of ED arrival in most cases (54/85, or 63%). Retrieval time was under five minutes in the rest, especially when “one click deep” in the EHR. When interviewed, 20/32 (63%) expressed “do not resuscitate” wishes, 10 of whom had no supporting documentation. Patients from assisted-living (odds ratio [OR] 6.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7–26) and long-term care facilities (OR 13; 95% CI, 2.5–65) were more likely to have a documented code status available compared to those living in the community. Conclusion: The majority of patients with end-stage disease, including half of those who would not wish resuscitation from cardiorespiratory arrest, did not have code status documents readily available upon arrival to our tertiary care ED. Patients living in the community with advanced disease may be at higher risk for unwanted resuscitative efforts should they present to hospital in extremis. While easily retrievable code status documentation within the EHR shows promise, its accuracy and validity remain important considerations.
url https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4vv609cp
work_keys_str_mv AT evanrussell codestatusdocumentationavailabilityandaccuracyamongemergencypatientswithendstagedisease
AT andrewkhall codestatusdocumentationavailabilityandaccuracyamongemergencypatientswithendstagedisease
AT conormckaigney codestatusdocumentationavailabilityandaccuracyamongemergencypatientswithendstagedisease
AT craiggoldie codestatusdocumentationavailabilityandaccuracyamongemergencypatientswithendstagedisease
AT ingridharle codestatusdocumentationavailabilityandaccuracyamongemergencypatientswithendstagedisease
AT marcolasivilotti codestatusdocumentationavailabilityandaccuracyamongemergencypatientswithendstagedisease
_version_ 1721378170322550784