Rhizosphere Bacterial Composition of the Sugar Beet Using SDS-PAGE Methodology

ABSTRACT The rhizosphere zone has been defined as the volume of soil directly influenced by the presence of living plant roots or soil compartment influenced by the root. During the growing season of 2014, the rhizobacteria of 23 sugar beet plants sampled from 12 sites in the west and north west of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Milad Aeini, Gholam Khodakaramian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná (Tecpar) 2018-06-01
Series:Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-89132017000100451&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-b02fd42fc1d84f1891d9fa08f5316bb9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b02fd42fc1d84f1891d9fa08f5316bb92020-11-24T21:59:56ZengInstituto de Tecnologia do Paraná (Tecpar)Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology1678-43242018-06-0160010.1590/1678-4324-2017160374S1516-89132017000100451Rhizosphere Bacterial Composition of the Sugar Beet Using SDS-PAGE MethodologyMilad AeiniGholam KhodakaramianABSTRACT The rhizosphere zone has been defined as the volume of soil directly influenced by the presence of living plant roots or soil compartment influenced by the root. During the growing season of 2014, the rhizobacteria of 23 sugar beet plants sampled from 12 sites in the west and north west of Iran were inventoried. Using a cultivation-dependent approach, a total of 217 bacteria were isolated from the rhizosphere. The bacterial isolates were tentatively grouped and documented based on polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of whole-cell proteins and were found to represent 43 different protein electrotypes. The majority of the fingerprint types were found only on a single occasion. Fifty-nine percent of the strains belonged to the five bacterial species and identified as Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas rhizophila and Serratia marcescens. Minor occurring fingerprint types were identified as Flavobacterium spp, Erwinia spp, Acetobacter spp, Agrobacterium spp, Enterobacter spp, Aeromonas spp and Bacillus spp.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-89132017000100451&lng=en&tlng=enRhizosphereSugar beetSDS-PAGEProtein fingerprint
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Milad Aeini
Gholam Khodakaramian
spellingShingle Milad Aeini
Gholam Khodakaramian
Rhizosphere Bacterial Composition of the Sugar Beet Using SDS-PAGE Methodology
Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology
Rhizosphere
Sugar beet
SDS-PAGE
Protein fingerprint
author_facet Milad Aeini
Gholam Khodakaramian
author_sort Milad Aeini
title Rhizosphere Bacterial Composition of the Sugar Beet Using SDS-PAGE Methodology
title_short Rhizosphere Bacterial Composition of the Sugar Beet Using SDS-PAGE Methodology
title_full Rhizosphere Bacterial Composition of the Sugar Beet Using SDS-PAGE Methodology
title_fullStr Rhizosphere Bacterial Composition of the Sugar Beet Using SDS-PAGE Methodology
title_full_unstemmed Rhizosphere Bacterial Composition of the Sugar Beet Using SDS-PAGE Methodology
title_sort rhizosphere bacterial composition of the sugar beet using sds-page methodology
publisher Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná (Tecpar)
series Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology
issn 1678-4324
publishDate 2018-06-01
description ABSTRACT The rhizosphere zone has been defined as the volume of soil directly influenced by the presence of living plant roots or soil compartment influenced by the root. During the growing season of 2014, the rhizobacteria of 23 sugar beet plants sampled from 12 sites in the west and north west of Iran were inventoried. Using a cultivation-dependent approach, a total of 217 bacteria were isolated from the rhizosphere. The bacterial isolates were tentatively grouped and documented based on polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of whole-cell proteins and were found to represent 43 different protein electrotypes. The majority of the fingerprint types were found only on a single occasion. Fifty-nine percent of the strains belonged to the five bacterial species and identified as Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas rhizophila and Serratia marcescens. Minor occurring fingerprint types were identified as Flavobacterium spp, Erwinia spp, Acetobacter spp, Agrobacterium spp, Enterobacter spp, Aeromonas spp and Bacillus spp.
topic Rhizosphere
Sugar beet
SDS-PAGE
Protein fingerprint
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-89132017000100451&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT miladaeini rhizospherebacterialcompositionofthesugarbeetusingsdspagemethodology
AT gholamkhodakaramian rhizospherebacterialcompositionofthesugarbeetusingsdspagemethodology
_version_ 1725846284068192256