A Prediction Model for Preoperative Risk Assessment in Endometrial Cancer Utilizing Clinical and Molecular Variables

The utility of comprehensive surgical staging in patients with low risk disease has been questioned. Thus, a reliable means of determining risk would be quite useful. The aim of our study was to create the best performing prediction model to classify endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) patients in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erin A. Salinas, Marina D. Miller, Andreea M. Newtson, Deepti Sharma, Megan E. McDonald, Matthew E. Keeney, Brian J. Smith, David P. Bender, Michael J. Goodheart, Kristina W. Thiel, Eric J. Devor, Kimberly K. Leslie, Jesus Gonzalez Bosquet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-03-01
Series:International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/5/1205
id doaj-b022760edd2e473dba4c36317919707e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b022760edd2e473dba4c36317919707e2020-11-25T02:14:52ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences1422-00672019-03-01205120510.3390/ijms20051205ijms20051205A Prediction Model for Preoperative Risk Assessment in Endometrial Cancer Utilizing Clinical and Molecular VariablesErin A. Salinas0Marina D. Miller1Andreea M. Newtson2Deepti Sharma3Megan E. McDonald4Matthew E. Keeney5Brian J. Smith6David P. Bender7Michael J. Goodheart8Kristina W. Thiel9Eric J. Devor10Kimberly K. Leslie11Jesus Gonzalez Bosquet12Compass Oncology, Portland, OR 97227, USADepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USADivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USADepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 52242, USADivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USAWinfield Pathology Consultants, Central DuPage Hospital, Winfield, IL 60190, USADepartment of Biostatistics, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA 52242, USADivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USADivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USADepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USADepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USADepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USADivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USAThe utility of comprehensive surgical staging in patients with low risk disease has been questioned. Thus, a reliable means of determining risk would be quite useful. The aim of our study was to create the best performing prediction model to classify endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) patients into low or high risk using a combination of molecular and clinical-pathological variables. We then validated these models with publicly available datasets. Analyses between low and high risk EEC were performed using clinical and pathological data, gene and miRNA expression data, gene copy number variation and somatic mutation data. Variables were selected to be included in the prediction model of risk using cross-validation analysis; prediction models were then constructed using these variables. Model performance was assessed by area under the curve (AUC). Prediction models were validated using appropriate datasets in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. A prediction model with only clinical variables performed at 88%. Integrating clinical and molecular data improved prediction performance up to 97%. The best prediction models included clinical, miRNA expression and/or somatic mutation data, and stratified pre-operative risk in EEC patients. Integrating molecular and clinical data improved the performance of prediction models to over 95%, resulting in potentially useful clinical tests.http://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/5/1205endometrial cancerprediction modelshigh riskintegration of dataclinical outcomes
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Erin A. Salinas
Marina D. Miller
Andreea M. Newtson
Deepti Sharma
Megan E. McDonald
Matthew E. Keeney
Brian J. Smith
David P. Bender
Michael J. Goodheart
Kristina W. Thiel
Eric J. Devor
Kimberly K. Leslie
Jesus Gonzalez Bosquet
spellingShingle Erin A. Salinas
Marina D. Miller
Andreea M. Newtson
Deepti Sharma
Megan E. McDonald
Matthew E. Keeney
Brian J. Smith
David P. Bender
Michael J. Goodheart
Kristina W. Thiel
Eric J. Devor
Kimberly K. Leslie
Jesus Gonzalez Bosquet
A Prediction Model for Preoperative Risk Assessment in Endometrial Cancer Utilizing Clinical and Molecular Variables
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
endometrial cancer
prediction models
high risk
integration of data
clinical outcomes
author_facet Erin A. Salinas
Marina D. Miller
Andreea M. Newtson
Deepti Sharma
Megan E. McDonald
Matthew E. Keeney
Brian J. Smith
David P. Bender
Michael J. Goodheart
Kristina W. Thiel
Eric J. Devor
Kimberly K. Leslie
Jesus Gonzalez Bosquet
author_sort Erin A. Salinas
title A Prediction Model for Preoperative Risk Assessment in Endometrial Cancer Utilizing Clinical and Molecular Variables
title_short A Prediction Model for Preoperative Risk Assessment in Endometrial Cancer Utilizing Clinical and Molecular Variables
title_full A Prediction Model for Preoperative Risk Assessment in Endometrial Cancer Utilizing Clinical and Molecular Variables
title_fullStr A Prediction Model for Preoperative Risk Assessment in Endometrial Cancer Utilizing Clinical and Molecular Variables
title_full_unstemmed A Prediction Model for Preoperative Risk Assessment in Endometrial Cancer Utilizing Clinical and Molecular Variables
title_sort prediction model for preoperative risk assessment in endometrial cancer utilizing clinical and molecular variables
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Molecular Sciences
issn 1422-0067
publishDate 2019-03-01
description The utility of comprehensive surgical staging in patients with low risk disease has been questioned. Thus, a reliable means of determining risk would be quite useful. The aim of our study was to create the best performing prediction model to classify endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) patients into low or high risk using a combination of molecular and clinical-pathological variables. We then validated these models with publicly available datasets. Analyses between low and high risk EEC were performed using clinical and pathological data, gene and miRNA expression data, gene copy number variation and somatic mutation data. Variables were selected to be included in the prediction model of risk using cross-validation analysis; prediction models were then constructed using these variables. Model performance was assessed by area under the curve (AUC). Prediction models were validated using appropriate datasets in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. A prediction model with only clinical variables performed at 88%. Integrating clinical and molecular data improved prediction performance up to 97%. The best prediction models included clinical, miRNA expression and/or somatic mutation data, and stratified pre-operative risk in EEC patients. Integrating molecular and clinical data improved the performance of prediction models to over 95%, resulting in potentially useful clinical tests.
topic endometrial cancer
prediction models
high risk
integration of data
clinical outcomes
url http://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/5/1205
work_keys_str_mv AT erinasalinas apredictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables
AT marinadmiller apredictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables
AT andreeamnewtson apredictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables
AT deeptisharma apredictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables
AT meganemcdonald apredictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables
AT matthewekeeney apredictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables
AT brianjsmith apredictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables
AT davidpbender apredictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables
AT michaeljgoodheart apredictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables
AT kristinawthiel apredictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables
AT ericjdevor apredictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables
AT kimberlykleslie apredictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables
AT jesusgonzalezbosquet apredictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables
AT erinasalinas predictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables
AT marinadmiller predictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables
AT andreeamnewtson predictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables
AT deeptisharma predictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables
AT meganemcdonald predictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables
AT matthewekeeney predictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables
AT brianjsmith predictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables
AT davidpbender predictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables
AT michaeljgoodheart predictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables
AT kristinawthiel predictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables
AT ericjdevor predictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables
AT kimberlykleslie predictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables
AT jesusgonzalezbosquet predictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables
_version_ 1724899258833829888