A Prediction Model for Preoperative Risk Assessment in Endometrial Cancer Utilizing Clinical and Molecular Variables
The utility of comprehensive surgical staging in patients with low risk disease has been questioned. Thus, a reliable means of determining risk would be quite useful. The aim of our study was to create the best performing prediction model to classify endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) patients in...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-03-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Molecular Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/5/1205 |
id |
doaj-b022760edd2e473dba4c36317919707e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b022760edd2e473dba4c36317919707e2020-11-25T02:14:52ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences1422-00672019-03-01205120510.3390/ijms20051205ijms20051205A Prediction Model for Preoperative Risk Assessment in Endometrial Cancer Utilizing Clinical and Molecular VariablesErin A. Salinas0Marina D. Miller1Andreea M. Newtson2Deepti Sharma3Megan E. McDonald4Matthew E. Keeney5Brian J. Smith6David P. Bender7Michael J. Goodheart8Kristina W. Thiel9Eric J. Devor10Kimberly K. Leslie11Jesus Gonzalez Bosquet12Compass Oncology, Portland, OR 97227, USADepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USADivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USADepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 52242, USADivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USAWinfield Pathology Consultants, Central DuPage Hospital, Winfield, IL 60190, USADepartment of Biostatistics, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA 52242, USADivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USADivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USADepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USADepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USADepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USADivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USAThe utility of comprehensive surgical staging in patients with low risk disease has been questioned. Thus, a reliable means of determining risk would be quite useful. The aim of our study was to create the best performing prediction model to classify endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) patients into low or high risk using a combination of molecular and clinical-pathological variables. We then validated these models with publicly available datasets. Analyses between low and high risk EEC were performed using clinical and pathological data, gene and miRNA expression data, gene copy number variation and somatic mutation data. Variables were selected to be included in the prediction model of risk using cross-validation analysis; prediction models were then constructed using these variables. Model performance was assessed by area under the curve (AUC). Prediction models were validated using appropriate datasets in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. A prediction model with only clinical variables performed at 88%. Integrating clinical and molecular data improved prediction performance up to 97%. The best prediction models included clinical, miRNA expression and/or somatic mutation data, and stratified pre-operative risk in EEC patients. Integrating molecular and clinical data improved the performance of prediction models to over 95%, resulting in potentially useful clinical tests.http://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/5/1205endometrial cancerprediction modelshigh riskintegration of dataclinical outcomes |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Erin A. Salinas Marina D. Miller Andreea M. Newtson Deepti Sharma Megan E. McDonald Matthew E. Keeney Brian J. Smith David P. Bender Michael J. Goodheart Kristina W. Thiel Eric J. Devor Kimberly K. Leslie Jesus Gonzalez Bosquet |
spellingShingle |
Erin A. Salinas Marina D. Miller Andreea M. Newtson Deepti Sharma Megan E. McDonald Matthew E. Keeney Brian J. Smith David P. Bender Michael J. Goodheart Kristina W. Thiel Eric J. Devor Kimberly K. Leslie Jesus Gonzalez Bosquet A Prediction Model for Preoperative Risk Assessment in Endometrial Cancer Utilizing Clinical and Molecular Variables International Journal of Molecular Sciences endometrial cancer prediction models high risk integration of data clinical outcomes |
author_facet |
Erin A. Salinas Marina D. Miller Andreea M. Newtson Deepti Sharma Megan E. McDonald Matthew E. Keeney Brian J. Smith David P. Bender Michael J. Goodheart Kristina W. Thiel Eric J. Devor Kimberly K. Leslie Jesus Gonzalez Bosquet |
author_sort |
Erin A. Salinas |
title |
A Prediction Model for Preoperative Risk Assessment in Endometrial Cancer Utilizing Clinical and Molecular Variables |
title_short |
A Prediction Model for Preoperative Risk Assessment in Endometrial Cancer Utilizing Clinical and Molecular Variables |
title_full |
A Prediction Model for Preoperative Risk Assessment in Endometrial Cancer Utilizing Clinical and Molecular Variables |
title_fullStr |
A Prediction Model for Preoperative Risk Assessment in Endometrial Cancer Utilizing Clinical and Molecular Variables |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Prediction Model for Preoperative Risk Assessment in Endometrial Cancer Utilizing Clinical and Molecular Variables |
title_sort |
prediction model for preoperative risk assessment in endometrial cancer utilizing clinical and molecular variables |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
International Journal of Molecular Sciences |
issn |
1422-0067 |
publishDate |
2019-03-01 |
description |
The utility of comprehensive surgical staging in patients with low risk disease has been questioned. Thus, a reliable means of determining risk would be quite useful. The aim of our study was to create the best performing prediction model to classify endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) patients into low or high risk using a combination of molecular and clinical-pathological variables. We then validated these models with publicly available datasets. Analyses between low and high risk EEC were performed using clinical and pathological data, gene and miRNA expression data, gene copy number variation and somatic mutation data. Variables were selected to be included in the prediction model of risk using cross-validation analysis; prediction models were then constructed using these variables. Model performance was assessed by area under the curve (AUC). Prediction models were validated using appropriate datasets in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. A prediction model with only clinical variables performed at 88%. Integrating clinical and molecular data improved prediction performance up to 97%. The best prediction models included clinical, miRNA expression and/or somatic mutation data, and stratified pre-operative risk in EEC patients. Integrating molecular and clinical data improved the performance of prediction models to over 95%, resulting in potentially useful clinical tests. |
topic |
endometrial cancer prediction models high risk integration of data clinical outcomes |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/5/1205 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT erinasalinas apredictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables AT marinadmiller apredictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables AT andreeamnewtson apredictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables AT deeptisharma apredictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables AT meganemcdonald apredictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables AT matthewekeeney apredictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables AT brianjsmith apredictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables AT davidpbender apredictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables AT michaeljgoodheart apredictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables AT kristinawthiel apredictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables AT ericjdevor apredictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables AT kimberlykleslie apredictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables AT jesusgonzalezbosquet apredictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables AT erinasalinas predictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables AT marinadmiller predictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables AT andreeamnewtson predictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables AT deeptisharma predictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables AT meganemcdonald predictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables AT matthewekeeney predictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables AT brianjsmith predictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables AT davidpbender predictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables AT michaeljgoodheart predictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables AT kristinawthiel predictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables AT ericjdevor predictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables AT kimberlykleslie predictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables AT jesusgonzalezbosquet predictionmodelforpreoperativeriskassessmentinendometrialcancerutilizingclinicalandmolecularvariables |
_version_ |
1724899258833829888 |