Microbial evaluation of implant surface

Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the microbial contamination in internal and external walls of cone morse implant walls. Methods: Eleven patients with edentulous mandibular posterior area were selected to received dental implants, divided into groups: submerged (S), non-submerged (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fabio Furquim, Tatiana Miranda Deliberador, Maria Cecilia Lopes Giacomel, Suyany Weiss, João César Zielak, Rafaela Scariot
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual de Campinas 2021-08-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8664809
id doaj-b01d1f4494e2433cbcfc229dd69a0182
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b01d1f4494e2433cbcfc229dd69a01822021-08-27T14:00:07ZengUniversidade Estadual de CampinasBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences1677-32252021-08-01210010.20396/bjos.v21i00.8664809Microbial evaluation of implant surface Fabio Furquim0Tatiana Miranda Deliberador1Maria Cecilia Lopes Giacomel2Suyany Weiss3João César Zielak4Rafaela Scariot5Positivo UniversityLatin American Institute of Dental Research and EducationPositivo UniversityPositivo UniversityPositivo UniversityFederal University of Paraná Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the microbial contamination in internal and external walls of cone morse implant walls. Methods: Eleven patients with edentulous mandibular posterior area were selected to received dental implants, divided into groups: submerged (S), non-submerged (NS), and immediately loaded (IL). Microbiological evaluations (microorganisms’ number, aerobic and anaerobic colony forming units (CFU) number and microorganisms’ qualification) were divided into internal and external collection of the implant walls, at different stages: T0 (surgical procedure), T2 (suture removal), T4 (reopening S group), T6 (suture removal S group), and T8 (abutment placement in S and NS). All data were submitted to statistical analyses, with confidence level of 0.05. Results: There was difference in number of microorganisms observed over time within the same group (p < 0.05). A difference was observed in CFU when evaluated within the same group over time (p < 0.05), except for the IL group. In internal collection, a predominance of non-formation of microorganisms was observed at T0 in all groups, while formation of Gram-positive Diplococci and Gram-positive Bacilli was observed at T8 (p>0.05). In external collection, an increase in number of microorganisms was observed at T0. Conclusion: There was no difference in microbial contamination among the evaluated groups. The microorganism’s colonization changed over time. https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8664809Dental implantsSurgery, oralActinobacteria
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fabio Furquim
Tatiana Miranda Deliberador
Maria Cecilia Lopes Giacomel
Suyany Weiss
João César Zielak
Rafaela Scariot
spellingShingle Fabio Furquim
Tatiana Miranda Deliberador
Maria Cecilia Lopes Giacomel
Suyany Weiss
João César Zielak
Rafaela Scariot
Microbial evaluation of implant surface
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
Dental implants
Surgery, oral
Actinobacteria
author_facet Fabio Furquim
Tatiana Miranda Deliberador
Maria Cecilia Lopes Giacomel
Suyany Weiss
João César Zielak
Rafaela Scariot
author_sort Fabio Furquim
title Microbial evaluation of implant surface
title_short Microbial evaluation of implant surface
title_full Microbial evaluation of implant surface
title_fullStr Microbial evaluation of implant surface
title_full_unstemmed Microbial evaluation of implant surface
title_sort microbial evaluation of implant surface
publisher Universidade Estadual de Campinas
series Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
issn 1677-3225
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the microbial contamination in internal and external walls of cone morse implant walls. Methods: Eleven patients with edentulous mandibular posterior area were selected to received dental implants, divided into groups: submerged (S), non-submerged (NS), and immediately loaded (IL). Microbiological evaluations (microorganisms’ number, aerobic and anaerobic colony forming units (CFU) number and microorganisms’ qualification) were divided into internal and external collection of the implant walls, at different stages: T0 (surgical procedure), T2 (suture removal), T4 (reopening S group), T6 (suture removal S group), and T8 (abutment placement in S and NS). All data were submitted to statistical analyses, with confidence level of 0.05. Results: There was difference in number of microorganisms observed over time within the same group (p < 0.05). A difference was observed in CFU when evaluated within the same group over time (p < 0.05), except for the IL group. In internal collection, a predominance of non-formation of microorganisms was observed at T0 in all groups, while formation of Gram-positive Diplococci and Gram-positive Bacilli was observed at T8 (p>0.05). In external collection, an increase in number of microorganisms was observed at T0. Conclusion: There was no difference in microbial contamination among the evaluated groups. The microorganism’s colonization changed over time.
topic Dental implants
Surgery, oral
Actinobacteria
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8664809
work_keys_str_mv AT fabiofurquim microbialevaluationofimplantsurface
AT tatianamirandadeliberador microbialevaluationofimplantsurface
AT mariacecilialopesgiacomel microbialevaluationofimplantsurface
AT suyanyweiss microbialevaluationofimplantsurface
AT joaocesarzielak microbialevaluationofimplantsurface
AT rafaelascariot microbialevaluationofimplantsurface
_version_ 1721188134414188544