Microbial evaluation of implant surface
Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the microbial contamination in internal and external walls of cone morse implant walls. Methods: Eleven patients with edentulous mandibular posterior area were selected to received dental implants, divided into groups: submerged (S), non-submerged (...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
2021-08-01
|
Series: | Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8664809 |
id |
doaj-b01d1f4494e2433cbcfc229dd69a0182 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b01d1f4494e2433cbcfc229dd69a01822021-08-27T14:00:07ZengUniversidade Estadual de CampinasBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences1677-32252021-08-01210010.20396/bjos.v21i00.8664809Microbial evaluation of implant surface Fabio Furquim0Tatiana Miranda Deliberador1Maria Cecilia Lopes Giacomel2Suyany Weiss3João César Zielak4Rafaela Scariot5Positivo UniversityLatin American Institute of Dental Research and EducationPositivo UniversityPositivo UniversityPositivo UniversityFederal University of Paraná Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the microbial contamination in internal and external walls of cone morse implant walls. Methods: Eleven patients with edentulous mandibular posterior area were selected to received dental implants, divided into groups: submerged (S), non-submerged (NS), and immediately loaded (IL). Microbiological evaluations (microorganisms’ number, aerobic and anaerobic colony forming units (CFU) number and microorganisms’ qualification) were divided into internal and external collection of the implant walls, at different stages: T0 (surgical procedure), T2 (suture removal), T4 (reopening S group), T6 (suture removal S group), and T8 (abutment placement in S and NS). All data were submitted to statistical analyses, with confidence level of 0.05. Results: There was difference in number of microorganisms observed over time within the same group (p < 0.05). A difference was observed in CFU when evaluated within the same group over time (p < 0.05), except for the IL group. In internal collection, a predominance of non-formation of microorganisms was observed at T0 in all groups, while formation of Gram-positive Diplococci and Gram-positive Bacilli was observed at T8 (p>0.05). In external collection, an increase in number of microorganisms was observed at T0. Conclusion: There was no difference in microbial contamination among the evaluated groups. The microorganism’s colonization changed over time. https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8664809Dental implantsSurgery, oralActinobacteria |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Fabio Furquim Tatiana Miranda Deliberador Maria Cecilia Lopes Giacomel Suyany Weiss João César Zielak Rafaela Scariot |
spellingShingle |
Fabio Furquim Tatiana Miranda Deliberador Maria Cecilia Lopes Giacomel Suyany Weiss João César Zielak Rafaela Scariot Microbial evaluation of implant surface Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences Dental implants Surgery, oral Actinobacteria |
author_facet |
Fabio Furquim Tatiana Miranda Deliberador Maria Cecilia Lopes Giacomel Suyany Weiss João César Zielak Rafaela Scariot |
author_sort |
Fabio Furquim |
title |
Microbial evaluation of implant surface |
title_short |
Microbial evaluation of implant surface |
title_full |
Microbial evaluation of implant surface |
title_fullStr |
Microbial evaluation of implant surface |
title_full_unstemmed |
Microbial evaluation of implant surface |
title_sort |
microbial evaluation of implant surface |
publisher |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
series |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences |
issn |
1677-3225 |
publishDate |
2021-08-01 |
description |
Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the microbial contamination in internal and external walls of cone morse implant walls. Methods: Eleven patients with edentulous mandibular posterior area were selected to received dental implants, divided into groups: submerged (S), non-submerged (NS), and immediately loaded (IL). Microbiological evaluations (microorganisms’ number, aerobic and anaerobic colony forming units (CFU) number and microorganisms’ qualification) were divided into internal and external collection of the implant walls, at different stages: T0 (surgical procedure), T2 (suture removal), T4 (reopening S group), T6 (suture removal S group), and T8 (abutment placement in S and NS). All data were submitted to statistical analyses, with confidence level of 0.05. Results: There was difference in number of microorganisms observed over time within the same group (p < 0.05). A difference was observed in CFU when evaluated within the same group over time (p < 0.05), except for the IL group. In internal collection, a predominance of non-formation of microorganisms was observed at T0 in all groups, while formation of Gram-positive Diplococci and Gram-positive Bacilli was observed at T8 (p>0.05). In external collection, an increase in number of microorganisms was observed at T0. Conclusion: There was no difference in microbial contamination among the evaluated groups. The microorganism’s colonization changed over time.
|
topic |
Dental implants Surgery, oral Actinobacteria |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8664809 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fabiofurquim microbialevaluationofimplantsurface AT tatianamirandadeliberador microbialevaluationofimplantsurface AT mariacecilialopesgiacomel microbialevaluationofimplantsurface AT suyanyweiss microbialevaluationofimplantsurface AT joaocesarzielak microbialevaluationofimplantsurface AT rafaelascariot microbialevaluationofimplantsurface |
_version_ |
1721188134414188544 |