Demand – Supply – Taxation in Times of Crisis

The confrontation of the two doctrines, the Keynesianism and the Supply-side economics highlight that the Laffer perspective is the way to achieve solid economic growth on the long way and aims the core of an “exit from crisis” policy. Therefore, this article aims to analyze the hypothesis that a hi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Diaconasu Delia Elena, Pohoata Ion, Socoliuc Oana Ramona
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oeconomica Timisiensis Foundation 2017-06-01
Series:Timisoara Journal of Economics and Business
Subjects:
E12
E62
B23
Online Access:http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/tjeb.2017.10.issue-1/tjeb-2017-0006/tjeb-2017-0006.xml?format=INT
id doaj-b019f3b60b1d43a3a9ebd98891c0a830
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b019f3b60b1d43a3a9ebd98891c0a8302020-11-25T00:11:07ZengOeconomica Timisiensis FoundationTimisoara Journal of Economics and Business2286-09912017-06-011018810310.1515/tjeb-2017-0006tjeb-2017-0006Demand – Supply – Taxation in Times of CrisisDiaconasu Delia Elena0Pohoata Ion1Socoliuc Oana Ramona2Researcher PhD, Department of Research, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania.Professor PhD, Department of Economics and International Relations, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania.Lecturer PhD, Department of Economics and International Relations, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania.The confrontation of the two doctrines, the Keynesianism and the Supply-side economics highlight that the Laffer perspective is the way to achieve solid economic growth on the long way and aims the core of an “exit from crisis” policy. Therefore, this article aims to analyze the hypothesis that a high level of taxation and public spending deters productive behavior and reduces economic growth during recessions. In other words, an easy taxation and low unproductive public spending are desirable for both, the enterprising investor and the consumer. Using the example of Romanian fiscal policy, on one side, we validated within a Vector Error Correction framework that an increase in government revenues harms consumption, investment and the level of employment, in conjunction with a procyclical behavior of fiscal authorities. On the other side, our results showed some positive effects of an increased government expenditures on consumption and employment, which can be explained by the accelerate deterioration of primary balance deficit and the Central Bank’s low interest rate. Moreover, even though the initial positive response of investment to a government spending shock is positive, this is ephemeral and nonsignificant. Our findings highlight that, in order to reach growth on the long-run in times of crisis, the Romanian economy should adopt the fiscal policy and measures suggested by the Supply-side Economics.http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/tjeb.2017.10.issue-1/tjeb-2017-0006/tjeb-2017-0006.xml?format=INTFiscal policyConsumptionInvestmentVector Error CorrectionCrisisE12E62B23
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Diaconasu Delia Elena
Pohoata Ion
Socoliuc Oana Ramona
spellingShingle Diaconasu Delia Elena
Pohoata Ion
Socoliuc Oana Ramona
Demand – Supply – Taxation in Times of Crisis
Timisoara Journal of Economics and Business
Fiscal policy
Consumption
Investment
Vector Error Correction
Crisis
E12
E62
B23
author_facet Diaconasu Delia Elena
Pohoata Ion
Socoliuc Oana Ramona
author_sort Diaconasu Delia Elena
title Demand – Supply – Taxation in Times of Crisis
title_short Demand – Supply – Taxation in Times of Crisis
title_full Demand – Supply – Taxation in Times of Crisis
title_fullStr Demand – Supply – Taxation in Times of Crisis
title_full_unstemmed Demand – Supply – Taxation in Times of Crisis
title_sort demand – supply – taxation in times of crisis
publisher Oeconomica Timisiensis Foundation
series Timisoara Journal of Economics and Business
issn 2286-0991
publishDate 2017-06-01
description The confrontation of the two doctrines, the Keynesianism and the Supply-side economics highlight that the Laffer perspective is the way to achieve solid economic growth on the long way and aims the core of an “exit from crisis” policy. Therefore, this article aims to analyze the hypothesis that a high level of taxation and public spending deters productive behavior and reduces economic growth during recessions. In other words, an easy taxation and low unproductive public spending are desirable for both, the enterprising investor and the consumer. Using the example of Romanian fiscal policy, on one side, we validated within a Vector Error Correction framework that an increase in government revenues harms consumption, investment and the level of employment, in conjunction with a procyclical behavior of fiscal authorities. On the other side, our results showed some positive effects of an increased government expenditures on consumption and employment, which can be explained by the accelerate deterioration of primary balance deficit and the Central Bank’s low interest rate. Moreover, even though the initial positive response of investment to a government spending shock is positive, this is ephemeral and nonsignificant. Our findings highlight that, in order to reach growth on the long-run in times of crisis, the Romanian economy should adopt the fiscal policy and measures suggested by the Supply-side Economics.
topic Fiscal policy
Consumption
Investment
Vector Error Correction
Crisis
E12
E62
B23
url http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/tjeb.2017.10.issue-1/tjeb-2017-0006/tjeb-2017-0006.xml?format=INT
work_keys_str_mv AT diaconasudeliaelena demandsupplytaxationintimesofcrisis
AT pohoataion demandsupplytaxationintimesofcrisis
AT socoliucoanaramona demandsupplytaxationintimesofcrisis
_version_ 1725405068274958336