Il futuro come problema politico. Francis Bacon e Giambattista Vico come matrici del moderno

[Future as a political problem. Francis Bacon and Giambattista Vico as matrix of modernity]. This essay shows the importance of the theme of the future as a political problem in Francis Bacon and Giambattista Vico. Bacon theorizes the possibility to control the future through experiments and the res...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mauro SCALERCIO
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR) 2018-12-01
Series:Laboratorio dell'ISPF
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ispf-lab.cnr.it/2018_SCM.pdf
id doaj-b005ae5a38974a01a3826c5637d59a1f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b005ae5a38974a01a3826c5637d59a1f2020-11-25T01:25:05ZengConsiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR)Laboratorio dell'ISPF1824-98172018-12-01XV1010.12862/Lab18SCMIl futuro come problema politico. Francis Bacon e Giambattista Vico come matrici del modernoMauro SCALERCIO0Universidad de Buenos Aires - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas[Future as a political problem. Francis Bacon and Giambattista Vico as matrix of modernity]. This essay shows the importance of the theme of the future as a political problem in Francis Bacon and Giambattista Vico. Bacon theorizes the possibility to control the future through experiments and the resulting natural laws. The whole construction of society has to be planned in order to achieve this end. In Vico the future appears to be a purely political problem, since the control of the future deals with the possibility to establish the rules that control the actions of the social group. Considering the control of the future as the core of political modernity allows to appreciate the crucial differences between Bacon and Vico, on one side, and Hobbes, who represents the “canonical” political modernity, on the other side. Hobbes’ Leviathan presents the social contract as the closure of political temporality. The theme of the future as a political problem allows then to understand the plurality of modernity, as it emerges from the different proposed solutions: a technical-scientific one in Bacon, a contractualistic one in Hobbes and a mythopoetic one in Vico.http://www.ispf-lab.cnr.it/2018_SCM.pdfFutureModernityT. HobbesF. BaconG. Vico
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mauro SCALERCIO
spellingShingle Mauro SCALERCIO
Il futuro come problema politico. Francis Bacon e Giambattista Vico come matrici del moderno
Laboratorio dell'ISPF
Future
Modernity
T. Hobbes
F. Bacon
G. Vico
author_facet Mauro SCALERCIO
author_sort Mauro SCALERCIO
title Il futuro come problema politico. Francis Bacon e Giambattista Vico come matrici del moderno
title_short Il futuro come problema politico. Francis Bacon e Giambattista Vico come matrici del moderno
title_full Il futuro come problema politico. Francis Bacon e Giambattista Vico come matrici del moderno
title_fullStr Il futuro come problema politico. Francis Bacon e Giambattista Vico come matrici del moderno
title_full_unstemmed Il futuro come problema politico. Francis Bacon e Giambattista Vico come matrici del moderno
title_sort il futuro come problema politico. francis bacon e giambattista vico come matrici del moderno
publisher Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR)
series Laboratorio dell'ISPF
issn 1824-9817
publishDate 2018-12-01
description [Future as a political problem. Francis Bacon and Giambattista Vico as matrix of modernity]. This essay shows the importance of the theme of the future as a political problem in Francis Bacon and Giambattista Vico. Bacon theorizes the possibility to control the future through experiments and the resulting natural laws. The whole construction of society has to be planned in order to achieve this end. In Vico the future appears to be a purely political problem, since the control of the future deals with the possibility to establish the rules that control the actions of the social group. Considering the control of the future as the core of political modernity allows to appreciate the crucial differences between Bacon and Vico, on one side, and Hobbes, who represents the “canonical” political modernity, on the other side. Hobbes’ Leviathan presents the social contract as the closure of political temporality. The theme of the future as a political problem allows then to understand the plurality of modernity, as it emerges from the different proposed solutions: a technical-scientific one in Bacon, a contractualistic one in Hobbes and a mythopoetic one in Vico.
topic Future
Modernity
T. Hobbes
F. Bacon
G. Vico
url http://www.ispf-lab.cnr.it/2018_SCM.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mauroscalercio ilfuturocomeproblemapoliticofrancisbaconegiambattistavicocomematricidelmoderno
_version_ 1725115315691454464