THE CHOSEN INSTRUMENT? RECONSIDERING THE EARLY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PAN AMERICAN AIRWAYS AND THE U.S. GOVERNMENT
During the late I920s and early 1930s, Pan American Airways became known as the U.S. “chosen instrument” for international commercial aviation. Most scholarly work about the U.S. government/Pan Am relationship presents the airline as the government’s instrument. This article challenges this traditio...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Economic & Business History Society
2004-06-01
|
Series: | Essays in Economic and Business History |
Online Access: | https://www.ebhsoc.org/journal/index.php/ebhs/article/view/129 |
id |
doaj-b003343f360c4b4a89f1d6e5d6f9ed67 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b003343f360c4b4a89f1d6e5d6f9ed672020-11-25T02:36:38ZengEconomic & Business History SocietyEssays in Economic and Business History0896-226X2004-06-0122197110129THE CHOSEN INSTRUMENT? RECONSIDERING THE EARLY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PAN AMERICAN AIRWAYS AND THE U.S. GOVERNMENTErik BensonDuring the late I920s and early 1930s, Pan American Airways became known as the U.S. “chosen instrument” for international commercial aviation. Most scholarly work about the U.S. government/Pan Am relationship presents the airline as the government’s instrument. This article challenges this traditional perspective. In certain ways Pan Am was an “instrument,” yet in others it defied such categorization. Thus, any notion that Pan Am was a “chosen instrument” merits qualification. Drawing upon the “corporatist” historical model, this study will present a more sophisticated account of this relationship, one that considers the role of business elites in shaping U.S. policy.https://www.ebhsoc.org/journal/index.php/ebhs/article/view/129 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Erik Benson |
spellingShingle |
Erik Benson THE CHOSEN INSTRUMENT? RECONSIDERING THE EARLY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PAN AMERICAN AIRWAYS AND THE U.S. GOVERNMENT Essays in Economic and Business History |
author_facet |
Erik Benson |
author_sort |
Erik Benson |
title |
THE CHOSEN INSTRUMENT? RECONSIDERING THE EARLY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PAN AMERICAN AIRWAYS AND THE U.S. GOVERNMENT |
title_short |
THE CHOSEN INSTRUMENT? RECONSIDERING THE EARLY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PAN AMERICAN AIRWAYS AND THE U.S. GOVERNMENT |
title_full |
THE CHOSEN INSTRUMENT? RECONSIDERING THE EARLY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PAN AMERICAN AIRWAYS AND THE U.S. GOVERNMENT |
title_fullStr |
THE CHOSEN INSTRUMENT? RECONSIDERING THE EARLY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PAN AMERICAN AIRWAYS AND THE U.S. GOVERNMENT |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE CHOSEN INSTRUMENT? RECONSIDERING THE EARLY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PAN AMERICAN AIRWAYS AND THE U.S. GOVERNMENT |
title_sort |
chosen instrument? reconsidering the early relationship between pan american airways and the u.s. government |
publisher |
Economic & Business History Society |
series |
Essays in Economic and Business History |
issn |
0896-226X |
publishDate |
2004-06-01 |
description |
During the late I920s and early 1930s, Pan American Airways became known as the U.S. “chosen instrument” for international commercial aviation. Most scholarly work about the U.S. government/Pan Am relationship presents the airline as the government’s instrument. This article challenges this traditional perspective. In certain ways Pan Am was an “instrument,” yet in others it defied such categorization. Thus, any notion that Pan Am was a “chosen instrument” merits qualification. Drawing upon the “corporatist” historical model, this study will present a more sophisticated account of this relationship, one that considers the role of business elites in shaping U.S. policy. |
url |
https://www.ebhsoc.org/journal/index.php/ebhs/article/view/129 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT erikbenson thechoseninstrumentreconsideringtheearlyrelationshipbetweenpanamericanairwaysandtheusgovernment AT erikbenson choseninstrumentreconsideringtheearlyrelationshipbetweenpanamericanairwaysandtheusgovernment |
_version_ |
1724799051913756672 |