Deep learning algorithm evaluation of hypertension classification in less photoplethysmography signals conditions

This study used photoplethysmography signals to classify hypertensive into no hypertension, prehypertension, stage I hypertension, and stage II hypertension. There are four deep learning models are compared in the study. The difficulties in the study are how to find the optimal parameters such as ke...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chih-Ta Yen, Sheng-Nan Chang, Cheng-Hong Liao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-03-01
Series:Measurement + Control
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/00202940211001904
id doaj-aff2fde16e994a97a6fb385fa67f85f1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aff2fde16e994a97a6fb385fa67f85f12021-04-22T22:05:23ZengSAGE PublishingMeasurement + Control0020-29402021-03-015410.1177/00202940211001904Deep learning algorithm evaluation of hypertension classification in less photoplethysmography signals conditionsChih-Ta Yen0Sheng-Nan Chang1Cheng-Hong Liao2Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung CityDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University, Yun-Lin Branch, Dou-Liu CityDepartment of Electrical Engineering, National Formosa University, Yunlin CountyThis study used photoplethysmography signals to classify hypertensive into no hypertension, prehypertension, stage I hypertension, and stage II hypertension. There are four deep learning models are compared in the study. The difficulties in the study are how to find the optimal parameters such as kernel, kernel size, and layers in less photoplethysmographyt (PPG) training data condition. PPG signals were used to train deep residual network convolutional neural network (ResNetCNN) and bidirectional long short-term memory (BILSTM) to determine the optimal operating parameters when each dataset consisted of 2100 data points. During the experiment, the proportion of training and testing datasets was 8:2. The model demonstrated an optimal classification accuracy of 76% when the testing dataset was used.https://doi.org/10.1177/00202940211001904
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chih-Ta Yen
Sheng-Nan Chang
Cheng-Hong Liao
spellingShingle Chih-Ta Yen
Sheng-Nan Chang
Cheng-Hong Liao
Deep learning algorithm evaluation of hypertension classification in less photoplethysmography signals conditions
Measurement + Control
author_facet Chih-Ta Yen
Sheng-Nan Chang
Cheng-Hong Liao
author_sort Chih-Ta Yen
title Deep learning algorithm evaluation of hypertension classification in less photoplethysmography signals conditions
title_short Deep learning algorithm evaluation of hypertension classification in less photoplethysmography signals conditions
title_full Deep learning algorithm evaluation of hypertension classification in less photoplethysmography signals conditions
title_fullStr Deep learning algorithm evaluation of hypertension classification in less photoplethysmography signals conditions
title_full_unstemmed Deep learning algorithm evaluation of hypertension classification in less photoplethysmography signals conditions
title_sort deep learning algorithm evaluation of hypertension classification in less photoplethysmography signals conditions
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Measurement + Control
issn 0020-2940
publishDate 2021-03-01
description This study used photoplethysmography signals to classify hypertensive into no hypertension, prehypertension, stage I hypertension, and stage II hypertension. There are four deep learning models are compared in the study. The difficulties in the study are how to find the optimal parameters such as kernel, kernel size, and layers in less photoplethysmographyt (PPG) training data condition. PPG signals were used to train deep residual network convolutional neural network (ResNetCNN) and bidirectional long short-term memory (BILSTM) to determine the optimal operating parameters when each dataset consisted of 2100 data points. During the experiment, the proportion of training and testing datasets was 8:2. The model demonstrated an optimal classification accuracy of 76% when the testing dataset was used.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/00202940211001904
work_keys_str_mv AT chihtayen deeplearningalgorithmevaluationofhypertensionclassificationinlessphotoplethysmographysignalsconditions
AT shengnanchang deeplearningalgorithmevaluationofhypertensionclassificationinlessphotoplethysmographysignalsconditions
AT chenghongliao deeplearningalgorithmevaluationofhypertensionclassificationinlessphotoplethysmographysignalsconditions
_version_ 1721514054378323968