Deep learning algorithm evaluation of hypertension classification in less photoplethysmography signals conditions
This study used photoplethysmography signals to classify hypertensive into no hypertension, prehypertension, stage I hypertension, and stage II hypertension. There are four deep learning models are compared in the study. The difficulties in the study are how to find the optimal parameters such as ke...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Measurement + Control |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/00202940211001904 |
id |
doaj-aff2fde16e994a97a6fb385fa67f85f1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-aff2fde16e994a97a6fb385fa67f85f12021-04-22T22:05:23ZengSAGE PublishingMeasurement + Control0020-29402021-03-015410.1177/00202940211001904Deep learning algorithm evaluation of hypertension classification in less photoplethysmography signals conditionsChih-Ta Yen0Sheng-Nan Chang1Cheng-Hong Liao2Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung CityDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University, Yun-Lin Branch, Dou-Liu CityDepartment of Electrical Engineering, National Formosa University, Yunlin CountyThis study used photoplethysmography signals to classify hypertensive into no hypertension, prehypertension, stage I hypertension, and stage II hypertension. There are four deep learning models are compared in the study. The difficulties in the study are how to find the optimal parameters such as kernel, kernel size, and layers in less photoplethysmographyt (PPG) training data condition. PPG signals were used to train deep residual network convolutional neural network (ResNetCNN) and bidirectional long short-term memory (BILSTM) to determine the optimal operating parameters when each dataset consisted of 2100 data points. During the experiment, the proportion of training and testing datasets was 8:2. The model demonstrated an optimal classification accuracy of 76% when the testing dataset was used.https://doi.org/10.1177/00202940211001904 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Chih-Ta Yen Sheng-Nan Chang Cheng-Hong Liao |
spellingShingle |
Chih-Ta Yen Sheng-Nan Chang Cheng-Hong Liao Deep learning algorithm evaluation of hypertension classification in less photoplethysmography signals conditions Measurement + Control |
author_facet |
Chih-Ta Yen Sheng-Nan Chang Cheng-Hong Liao |
author_sort |
Chih-Ta Yen |
title |
Deep learning algorithm evaluation of hypertension classification in less photoplethysmography signals conditions |
title_short |
Deep learning algorithm evaluation of hypertension classification in less photoplethysmography signals conditions |
title_full |
Deep learning algorithm evaluation of hypertension classification in less photoplethysmography signals conditions |
title_fullStr |
Deep learning algorithm evaluation of hypertension classification in less photoplethysmography signals conditions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Deep learning algorithm evaluation of hypertension classification in less photoplethysmography signals conditions |
title_sort |
deep learning algorithm evaluation of hypertension classification in less photoplethysmography signals conditions |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Measurement + Control |
issn |
0020-2940 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
This study used photoplethysmography signals to classify hypertensive into no hypertension, prehypertension, stage I hypertension, and stage II hypertension. There are four deep learning models are compared in the study. The difficulties in the study are how to find the optimal parameters such as kernel, kernel size, and layers in less photoplethysmographyt (PPG) training data condition. PPG signals were used to train deep residual network convolutional neural network (ResNetCNN) and bidirectional long short-term memory (BILSTM) to determine the optimal operating parameters when each dataset consisted of 2100 data points. During the experiment, the proportion of training and testing datasets was 8:2. The model demonstrated an optimal classification accuracy of 76% when the testing dataset was used. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/00202940211001904 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT chihtayen deeplearningalgorithmevaluationofhypertensionclassificationinlessphotoplethysmographysignalsconditions AT shengnanchang deeplearningalgorithmevaluationofhypertensionclassificationinlessphotoplethysmographysignalsconditions AT chenghongliao deeplearningalgorithmevaluationofhypertensionclassificationinlessphotoplethysmographysignalsconditions |
_version_ |
1721514054378323968 |