“Maestro, qual é a música?”

This paper offers an empirical objection against the arguments used by brazilian’s diplomacy requesting a permanent seat in the Security Council. The reasons presented to support the demand are just normative ones. It is presented a rather different way to achieve the brazilian’s foreign “main objec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Luiz Fernando Horta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais 2017-10-01
Series:Meridiano 47
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/MED/article/view/4832
id doaj-afeec457255046cbb892e6ddd7e45de1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-afeec457255046cbb892e6ddd7e45de12020-11-25T00:47:04ZengInstituto Brasileiro de Relações InternacionaisMeridiano 471518-12192017-10-011514125354832“Maestro, qual é a música?”Luiz Fernando Horta0UNB/IRELThis paper offers an empirical objection against the arguments used by brazilian’s diplomacy requesting a permanent seat in the Security Council. The reasons presented to support the demand are just normative ones. It is presented a rather different way to achieve the brazilian’s foreign “main objective”: to change Security Council.https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/MED/article/view/4832security councilpost cold war orderinternational politicsbrazilian’s foreign policy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Luiz Fernando Horta
spellingShingle Luiz Fernando Horta
“Maestro, qual é a música?”
Meridiano 47
security council
post cold war order
international politics
brazilian’s foreign policy
author_facet Luiz Fernando Horta
author_sort Luiz Fernando Horta
title “Maestro, qual é a música?”
title_short “Maestro, qual é a música?”
title_full “Maestro, qual é a música?”
title_fullStr “Maestro, qual é a música?”
title_full_unstemmed “Maestro, qual é a música?”
title_sort “maestro, qual é a música?”
publisher Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais
series Meridiano 47
issn 1518-1219
publishDate 2017-10-01
description This paper offers an empirical objection against the arguments used by brazilian’s diplomacy requesting a permanent seat in the Security Council. The reasons presented to support the demand are just normative ones. It is presented a rather different way to achieve the brazilian’s foreign “main objective”: to change Security Council.
topic security council
post cold war order
international politics
brazilian’s foreign policy
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/MED/article/view/4832
work_keys_str_mv AT luizfernandohorta maestroqualeamusica
_version_ 1725262083206938624