WICID framework version 1.0: criteria and considerations to guide evidence-informed decision-making on non-pharmacological interventions targeting COVID-19

Introduction Public health decision-making requires the balancing of numerous, often conflicting factors. However, participatory, evidence-informed decision-making processes to identify and weigh these factors are often not possible- especially, in the context of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. While evide...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jan M Stratil, Maike Voss, Laura Arnold
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-01
Series:BMJ Global Health
Online Access:https://gh.bmj.com/content/5/11/e003699.full
id doaj-afe3d3760d234d249be52bea853e1f02
record_format Article
spelling doaj-afe3d3760d234d249be52bea853e1f022021-01-21T21:30:18ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Global Health2059-79082020-11-0151110.1136/bmjgh-2020-003699WICID framework version 1.0: criteria and considerations to guide evidence-informed decision-making on non-pharmacological interventions targeting COVID-19Jan M Stratil0Maike Voss1Laura Arnold2Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology — IBE and Pettenkofer School of Public Health, LMU Munich, Munich, Bavaria, GermanyGlobal Issues Division, German Institute for International and Security Affairs, Berlin, GermanyEpidemiology and Health Reporting, Academy of Public Health Services, Duesseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, GermanyIntroduction Public health decision-making requires the balancing of numerous, often conflicting factors. However, participatory, evidence-informed decision-making processes to identify and weigh these factors are often not possible- especially, in the context of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. While evidence-to-decision frameworks are not able or intended to replace stakeholder participation, they can serve as a tool to approach relevancy and comprehensiveness of the criteria considered.Objective To develop a decision-making framework adapted to the challenges of decision-making on non-pharmacological interventions to contain the global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.Methods We employed the ‘best fit’ framework synthesis technique and used the WHO-INTEGRATE framework as a starting point. First, we adapted the framework through brainstorming exercises and application to case studies. Next, we conducted a content analysis of comprehensive strategy documents intended to guide policymakers on the phasing out of applied lockdown measures in Germany. Based on factors and criteria identified in this process, we developed the WICID (WHO-INTEGRATE COVID-19) framework version 1.0.Results Twelve comprehensive strategy documents were analysed. The revised framework consists of 11+1 criteria, supported by 48 aspects, and embraces a complex systems perspective. The criteria cover implications for the health of individuals and populations due to and beyond COVID-19, infringement on liberties and fundamental human rights, acceptability and equity considerations, societal, environmental and economic implications, as well as implementation, resource and feasibility considerations.Discussion The proposed framework will be expanded through a comprehensive document analysis focusing on key stakeholder groups across the society. The WICID framework can be a tool to support comprehensive evidence-informed decision-making processes.https://gh.bmj.com/content/5/11/e003699.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jan M Stratil
Maike Voss
Laura Arnold
spellingShingle Jan M Stratil
Maike Voss
Laura Arnold
WICID framework version 1.0: criteria and considerations to guide evidence-informed decision-making on non-pharmacological interventions targeting COVID-19
BMJ Global Health
author_facet Jan M Stratil
Maike Voss
Laura Arnold
author_sort Jan M Stratil
title WICID framework version 1.0: criteria and considerations to guide evidence-informed decision-making on non-pharmacological interventions targeting COVID-19
title_short WICID framework version 1.0: criteria and considerations to guide evidence-informed decision-making on non-pharmacological interventions targeting COVID-19
title_full WICID framework version 1.0: criteria and considerations to guide evidence-informed decision-making on non-pharmacological interventions targeting COVID-19
title_fullStr WICID framework version 1.0: criteria and considerations to guide evidence-informed decision-making on non-pharmacological interventions targeting COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed WICID framework version 1.0: criteria and considerations to guide evidence-informed decision-making on non-pharmacological interventions targeting COVID-19
title_sort wicid framework version 1.0: criteria and considerations to guide evidence-informed decision-making on non-pharmacological interventions targeting covid-19
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Global Health
issn 2059-7908
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Introduction Public health decision-making requires the balancing of numerous, often conflicting factors. However, participatory, evidence-informed decision-making processes to identify and weigh these factors are often not possible- especially, in the context of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. While evidence-to-decision frameworks are not able or intended to replace stakeholder participation, they can serve as a tool to approach relevancy and comprehensiveness of the criteria considered.Objective To develop a decision-making framework adapted to the challenges of decision-making on non-pharmacological interventions to contain the global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.Methods We employed the ‘best fit’ framework synthesis technique and used the WHO-INTEGRATE framework as a starting point. First, we adapted the framework through brainstorming exercises and application to case studies. Next, we conducted a content analysis of comprehensive strategy documents intended to guide policymakers on the phasing out of applied lockdown measures in Germany. Based on factors and criteria identified in this process, we developed the WICID (WHO-INTEGRATE COVID-19) framework version 1.0.Results Twelve comprehensive strategy documents were analysed. The revised framework consists of 11+1 criteria, supported by 48 aspects, and embraces a complex systems perspective. The criteria cover implications for the health of individuals and populations due to and beyond COVID-19, infringement on liberties and fundamental human rights, acceptability and equity considerations, societal, environmental and economic implications, as well as implementation, resource and feasibility considerations.Discussion The proposed framework will be expanded through a comprehensive document analysis focusing on key stakeholder groups across the society. The WICID framework can be a tool to support comprehensive evidence-informed decision-making processes.
url https://gh.bmj.com/content/5/11/e003699.full
work_keys_str_mv AT janmstratil wicidframeworkversion10criteriaandconsiderationstoguideevidenceinformeddecisionmakingonnonpharmacologicalinterventionstargetingcovid19
AT maikevoss wicidframeworkversion10criteriaandconsiderationstoguideevidenceinformeddecisionmakingonnonpharmacologicalinterventionstargetingcovid19
AT lauraarnold wicidframeworkversion10criteriaandconsiderationstoguideevidenceinformeddecisionmakingonnonpharmacologicalinterventionstargetingcovid19
_version_ 1724329721715490816