Identifying dynamical modules from genetic regulatory systems: applications to the segment polarity network

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>It is widely accepted that genetic regulatory systems are 'modular', in that the whole system is made up of smaller 'subsystems' corresponding to specific biological functions. Most attempts to identify modules in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Monk Nicholas AM, Irons David J
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2007-10-01
Series:BMC Bioinformatics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/8/413
id doaj-afd9be437e844052836b6ecd313c6b68
record_format Article
spelling doaj-afd9be437e844052836b6ecd313c6b682020-11-25T00:17:04ZengBMCBMC Bioinformatics1471-21052007-10-018141310.1186/1471-2105-8-413Identifying dynamical modules from genetic regulatory systems: applications to the segment polarity networkMonk Nicholas AMIrons David J<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>It is widely accepted that genetic regulatory systems are 'modular', in that the whole system is made up of smaller 'subsystems' corresponding to specific biological functions. Most attempts to identify modules in genetic regulatory systems have relied on the topology of the underlying network. However, it is the temporal activity (dynamics) of genes and proteins that corresponds to biological functions, and hence it is dynamics that we focus on here for identifying subsystems.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Using Boolean network models as an exemplar, we present a new technique to identify subsystems, based on their dynamical properties. The main part of the method depends only on the stable dynamics (attractors) of the system, thus requiring no prior knowledge of the underlying network. However, knowledge of the logical relationships between the network components can be used to describe how each subsystem is regulated. To demonstrate its applicability to genetic regulatory systems, we apply the method to a model of the <it>Drosophila </it>segment polarity network, providing a detailed breakdown of the system.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>We have designed a technique for decomposing any set of discrete-state, discrete-time attractors into subsystems. Having a suitable mathematical model also allows us to describe how each subsystem is regulated and how robust each subsystem is against perturbations. However, since the subsystems are found directly from the attractors, a mathematical model or underlying network topology is not necessarily required to identify them, potentially allowing the method to be applied directly to experimental expression data.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/8/413
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Monk Nicholas AM
Irons David J
spellingShingle Monk Nicholas AM
Irons David J
Identifying dynamical modules from genetic regulatory systems: applications to the segment polarity network
BMC Bioinformatics
author_facet Monk Nicholas AM
Irons David J
author_sort Monk Nicholas AM
title Identifying dynamical modules from genetic regulatory systems: applications to the segment polarity network
title_short Identifying dynamical modules from genetic regulatory systems: applications to the segment polarity network
title_full Identifying dynamical modules from genetic regulatory systems: applications to the segment polarity network
title_fullStr Identifying dynamical modules from genetic regulatory systems: applications to the segment polarity network
title_full_unstemmed Identifying dynamical modules from genetic regulatory systems: applications to the segment polarity network
title_sort identifying dynamical modules from genetic regulatory systems: applications to the segment polarity network
publisher BMC
series BMC Bioinformatics
issn 1471-2105
publishDate 2007-10-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>It is widely accepted that genetic regulatory systems are 'modular', in that the whole system is made up of smaller 'subsystems' corresponding to specific biological functions. Most attempts to identify modules in genetic regulatory systems have relied on the topology of the underlying network. However, it is the temporal activity (dynamics) of genes and proteins that corresponds to biological functions, and hence it is dynamics that we focus on here for identifying subsystems.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Using Boolean network models as an exemplar, we present a new technique to identify subsystems, based on their dynamical properties. The main part of the method depends only on the stable dynamics (attractors) of the system, thus requiring no prior knowledge of the underlying network. However, knowledge of the logical relationships between the network components can be used to describe how each subsystem is regulated. To demonstrate its applicability to genetic regulatory systems, we apply the method to a model of the <it>Drosophila </it>segment polarity network, providing a detailed breakdown of the system.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>We have designed a technique for decomposing any set of discrete-state, discrete-time attractors into subsystems. Having a suitable mathematical model also allows us to describe how each subsystem is regulated and how robust each subsystem is against perturbations. However, since the subsystems are found directly from the attractors, a mathematical model or underlying network topology is not necessarily required to identify them, potentially allowing the method to be applied directly to experimental expression data.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/8/413
work_keys_str_mv AT monknicholasam identifyingdynamicalmodulesfromgeneticregulatorysystemsapplicationstothesegmentpolaritynetwork
AT ironsdavidj identifyingdynamicalmodulesfromgeneticregulatorysystemsapplicationstothesegmentpolaritynetwork
_version_ 1725381259270553600