Biophoty: The Biofilm in Biography Theory

This article aims to outline some of the main ways in which biographical film is influencing both modern print biography and the current development of biography theory. It begins by looking back to a debate going on in the 1970s and 1980s about whether film was a sui...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Joanny Moulin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Maison de la Recherche en Sciences Humaines 2016-12-01
Series:Revue LISA
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/lisa/8959
id doaj-afbb6e671a604051b116df7fd4ed4b67
record_format Article
spelling doaj-afbb6e671a604051b116df7fd4ed4b672021-10-02T03:23:09ZengMaison de la Recherche en Sciences HumainesRevue LISA1762-61532016-12-0110.4000/lisa.8959Biophoty: The Biofilm in Biography TheoryJoanny MoulinThis article aims to outline some of the main ways in which biographical film is influencing both modern print biography and the current development of biography theory. It begins by looking back to a debate going on in the 1970s and 1980s about whether film was a suitable medium for historiography and historical research, contrasting the reluctance of some American and British researchers like Robert Rosenstone, Ian Jarvie and Belén Vidal with French historian Marc Ferro’s engagement in favour of the use of cinema in history studies, and his contention that “history on film has become a force”. The term “biopic”, designating properly speaking a Hollywood invention, introduces a deleterious conceptual-cum-ideological misunderstanding that inhibits theorization. Concurring with Rosenstone to favour the word “biopic”, it suggests to go one step further by deriving from Hayden White’s “historiophoty” the term “biophoty”. With particular reference especially to examples of American and French biofilms, it shows how film has retroacted on print, especially by fostering the development of what Hans Renders has called “partial biography”.http://journals.openedition.org/lisa/8959biopicbiographycinemahistoriophotybiophoty
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Joanny Moulin
spellingShingle Joanny Moulin
Biophoty: The Biofilm in Biography Theory
Revue LISA
biopic
biography
cinema
historiophoty
biophoty
author_facet Joanny Moulin
author_sort Joanny Moulin
title Biophoty: The Biofilm in Biography Theory
title_short Biophoty: The Biofilm in Biography Theory
title_full Biophoty: The Biofilm in Biography Theory
title_fullStr Biophoty: The Biofilm in Biography Theory
title_full_unstemmed Biophoty: The Biofilm in Biography Theory
title_sort biophoty: the biofilm in biography theory
publisher Maison de la Recherche en Sciences Humaines
series Revue LISA
issn 1762-6153
publishDate 2016-12-01
description This article aims to outline some of the main ways in which biographical film is influencing both modern print biography and the current development of biography theory. It begins by looking back to a debate going on in the 1970s and 1980s about whether film was a suitable medium for historiography and historical research, contrasting the reluctance of some American and British researchers like Robert Rosenstone, Ian Jarvie and Belén Vidal with French historian Marc Ferro’s engagement in favour of the use of cinema in history studies, and his contention that “history on film has become a force”. The term “biopic”, designating properly speaking a Hollywood invention, introduces a deleterious conceptual-cum-ideological misunderstanding that inhibits theorization. Concurring with Rosenstone to favour the word “biopic”, it suggests to go one step further by deriving from Hayden White’s “historiophoty” the term “biophoty”. With particular reference especially to examples of American and French biofilms, it shows how film has retroacted on print, especially by fostering the development of what Hans Renders has called “partial biography”.
topic biopic
biography
cinema
historiophoty
biophoty
url http://journals.openedition.org/lisa/8959
work_keys_str_mv AT joannymoulin biophotythebiofilminbiographytheory
_version_ 1716859936181321728