Resilient coping in the general population: standardization of the brief resilient coping scale (BRCS)

Abstract Background There has been a marked tendency for researchers, clinicians, and policy makers to shift their focus from risk to resilience. This should be assessed by comparing the outcome to a context specific reference group. The objectives of the study were to generate normative data for th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rüya-Daniela Kocalevent, Markus Zenger, Andreas Hinz, Burghard Klapp, Elmar Brähler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-12-01
Series:Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12955-017-0822-6
id doaj-afb0480317c649ca9b0366bc112ed972
record_format Article
spelling doaj-afb0480317c649ca9b0366bc112ed9722020-11-24T20:40:43ZengBMCHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes1477-75252017-12-011511810.1186/s12955-017-0822-6Resilient coping in the general population: standardization of the brief resilient coping scale (BRCS)Rüya-Daniela Kocalevent0Markus Zenger1Andreas Hinz2Burghard Klapp3Elmar Brähler4Institute and Policlinic for Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-EppendorfFaculty of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg and StendalDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of LeipzigDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, Charité University MedicineDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of LeipzigAbstract Background There has been a marked tendency for researchers, clinicians, and policy makers to shift their focus from risk to resilience. This should be assessed by comparing the outcome to a context specific reference group. The objectives of the study were to generate normative data for the BRCS for different age groups for men and women and to further investigate the construct validity and factor structure in a general population. Methods Nationally representative face-to face household surveys were conducted in Germany in 2013 (n = 2508). Results Normative data for the BRCS were generated for men and women (53.2% female) and different age levels (mean age (SD) of 49.7 (18.0) years). Men had significantly higher mean scores compared with women (14.9 [SD = 3.2] vs. 14.6 [SD = 3.1]). The results of the EFA and CFA clearly indicate a unidimensional solution with one factor. Furthermore, the invariance of the one-factor model was tested for the whole sample across gender and six age groups. Conclusions The normative data provide a framework for the interpretation and comparisons of resilience with other populations.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12955-017-0822-6ResilienceCopingNormative dataBrcsGeneral population
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rüya-Daniela Kocalevent
Markus Zenger
Andreas Hinz
Burghard Klapp
Elmar Brähler
spellingShingle Rüya-Daniela Kocalevent
Markus Zenger
Andreas Hinz
Burghard Klapp
Elmar Brähler
Resilient coping in the general population: standardization of the brief resilient coping scale (BRCS)
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Resilience
Coping
Normative data
Brcs
General population
author_facet Rüya-Daniela Kocalevent
Markus Zenger
Andreas Hinz
Burghard Klapp
Elmar Brähler
author_sort Rüya-Daniela Kocalevent
title Resilient coping in the general population: standardization of the brief resilient coping scale (BRCS)
title_short Resilient coping in the general population: standardization of the brief resilient coping scale (BRCS)
title_full Resilient coping in the general population: standardization of the brief resilient coping scale (BRCS)
title_fullStr Resilient coping in the general population: standardization of the brief resilient coping scale (BRCS)
title_full_unstemmed Resilient coping in the general population: standardization of the brief resilient coping scale (BRCS)
title_sort resilient coping in the general population: standardization of the brief resilient coping scale (brcs)
publisher BMC
series Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
issn 1477-7525
publishDate 2017-12-01
description Abstract Background There has been a marked tendency for researchers, clinicians, and policy makers to shift their focus from risk to resilience. This should be assessed by comparing the outcome to a context specific reference group. The objectives of the study were to generate normative data for the BRCS for different age groups for men and women and to further investigate the construct validity and factor structure in a general population. Methods Nationally representative face-to face household surveys were conducted in Germany in 2013 (n = 2508). Results Normative data for the BRCS were generated for men and women (53.2% female) and different age levels (mean age (SD) of 49.7 (18.0) years). Men had significantly higher mean scores compared with women (14.9 [SD = 3.2] vs. 14.6 [SD = 3.1]). The results of the EFA and CFA clearly indicate a unidimensional solution with one factor. Furthermore, the invariance of the one-factor model was tested for the whole sample across gender and six age groups. Conclusions The normative data provide a framework for the interpretation and comparisons of resilience with other populations.
topic Resilience
Coping
Normative data
Brcs
General population
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12955-017-0822-6
work_keys_str_mv AT ruyadanielakocalevent resilientcopinginthegeneralpopulationstandardizationofthebriefresilientcopingscalebrcs
AT markuszenger resilientcopinginthegeneralpopulationstandardizationofthebriefresilientcopingscalebrcs
AT andreashinz resilientcopinginthegeneralpopulationstandardizationofthebriefresilientcopingscalebrcs
AT burghardklapp resilientcopinginthegeneralpopulationstandardizationofthebriefresilientcopingscalebrcs
AT elmarbrahler resilientcopinginthegeneralpopulationstandardizationofthebriefresilientcopingscalebrcs
_version_ 1716825901832863744