Resilient coping in the general population: standardization of the brief resilient coping scale (BRCS)
Abstract Background There has been a marked tendency for researchers, clinicians, and policy makers to shift their focus from risk to resilience. This should be assessed by comparing the outcome to a context specific reference group. The objectives of the study were to generate normative data for th...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-12-01
|
Series: | Health and Quality of Life Outcomes |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12955-017-0822-6 |
id |
doaj-afb0480317c649ca9b0366bc112ed972 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-afb0480317c649ca9b0366bc112ed9722020-11-24T20:40:43ZengBMCHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes1477-75252017-12-011511810.1186/s12955-017-0822-6Resilient coping in the general population: standardization of the brief resilient coping scale (BRCS)Rüya-Daniela Kocalevent0Markus Zenger1Andreas Hinz2Burghard Klapp3Elmar Brähler4Institute and Policlinic for Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-EppendorfFaculty of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg and StendalDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of LeipzigDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, Charité University MedicineDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of LeipzigAbstract Background There has been a marked tendency for researchers, clinicians, and policy makers to shift their focus from risk to resilience. This should be assessed by comparing the outcome to a context specific reference group. The objectives of the study were to generate normative data for the BRCS for different age groups for men and women and to further investigate the construct validity and factor structure in a general population. Methods Nationally representative face-to face household surveys were conducted in Germany in 2013 (n = 2508). Results Normative data for the BRCS were generated for men and women (53.2% female) and different age levels (mean age (SD) of 49.7 (18.0) years). Men had significantly higher mean scores compared with women (14.9 [SD = 3.2] vs. 14.6 [SD = 3.1]). The results of the EFA and CFA clearly indicate a unidimensional solution with one factor. Furthermore, the invariance of the one-factor model was tested for the whole sample across gender and six age groups. Conclusions The normative data provide a framework for the interpretation and comparisons of resilience with other populations.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12955-017-0822-6ResilienceCopingNormative dataBrcsGeneral population |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Rüya-Daniela Kocalevent Markus Zenger Andreas Hinz Burghard Klapp Elmar Brähler |
spellingShingle |
Rüya-Daniela Kocalevent Markus Zenger Andreas Hinz Burghard Klapp Elmar Brähler Resilient coping in the general population: standardization of the brief resilient coping scale (BRCS) Health and Quality of Life Outcomes Resilience Coping Normative data Brcs General population |
author_facet |
Rüya-Daniela Kocalevent Markus Zenger Andreas Hinz Burghard Klapp Elmar Brähler |
author_sort |
Rüya-Daniela Kocalevent |
title |
Resilient coping in the general population: standardization of the brief resilient coping scale (BRCS) |
title_short |
Resilient coping in the general population: standardization of the brief resilient coping scale (BRCS) |
title_full |
Resilient coping in the general population: standardization of the brief resilient coping scale (BRCS) |
title_fullStr |
Resilient coping in the general population: standardization of the brief resilient coping scale (BRCS) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Resilient coping in the general population: standardization of the brief resilient coping scale (BRCS) |
title_sort |
resilient coping in the general population: standardization of the brief resilient coping scale (brcs) |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes |
issn |
1477-7525 |
publishDate |
2017-12-01 |
description |
Abstract Background There has been a marked tendency for researchers, clinicians, and policy makers to shift their focus from risk to resilience. This should be assessed by comparing the outcome to a context specific reference group. The objectives of the study were to generate normative data for the BRCS for different age groups for men and women and to further investigate the construct validity and factor structure in a general population. Methods Nationally representative face-to face household surveys were conducted in Germany in 2013 (n = 2508). Results Normative data for the BRCS were generated for men and women (53.2% female) and different age levels (mean age (SD) of 49.7 (18.0) years). Men had significantly higher mean scores compared with women (14.9 [SD = 3.2] vs. 14.6 [SD = 3.1]). The results of the EFA and CFA clearly indicate a unidimensional solution with one factor. Furthermore, the invariance of the one-factor model was tested for the whole sample across gender and six age groups. Conclusions The normative data provide a framework for the interpretation and comparisons of resilience with other populations. |
topic |
Resilience Coping Normative data Brcs General population |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12955-017-0822-6 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ruyadanielakocalevent resilientcopinginthegeneralpopulationstandardizationofthebriefresilientcopingscalebrcs AT markuszenger resilientcopinginthegeneralpopulationstandardizationofthebriefresilientcopingscalebrcs AT andreashinz resilientcopinginthegeneralpopulationstandardizationofthebriefresilientcopingscalebrcs AT burghardklapp resilientcopinginthegeneralpopulationstandardizationofthebriefresilientcopingscalebrcs AT elmarbrahler resilientcopinginthegeneralpopulationstandardizationofthebriefresilientcopingscalebrcs |
_version_ |
1716825901832863744 |