Corporate Effects Of The ‘Danosa Case’ – Is the Termination of Membership in the Board of Directors Allowed in the Case of a Pregnant Member of the Board?

The Court of Justice of the European Union (Second Chamber) pronounced on 11th November 2010 a judgement in the proceedings between Ms Dita Danosa and LKB Lizings SIA, a limited liability company, concerning the decision of the LKB general meeting of shareholders to remove Ms Danosa from her post as...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Siniša Petrović, Petar Ceronja
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law 2012-12-01
Series:Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/139
id doaj-afb0190ef26247a9865f3d33e647b169
record_format Article
spelling doaj-afb0190ef26247a9865f3d33e647b1692020-11-25T03:41:40ZengUniversity of Zagreb, Faculty of LawCroatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy1845-56621848-99582012-12-01843745610.3935/cyelp.08.2012.139Corporate Effects Of The ‘Danosa Case’ – Is the Termination of Membership in the Board of Directors Allowed in the Case of a Pregnant Member of the Board?Siniša Petrović0Petar Ceronja1University of ZagrebUniversity of ZagrebThe Court of Justice of the European Union (Second Chamber) pronounced on 11th November 2010 a judgement in the proceedings between Ms Dita Danosa and LKB Lizings SIA, a limited liability company, concerning the decision of the LKB general meeting of shareholders to remove Ms Danosa from her post as a member of the company's board of directors during her pregnancy. The Court's ruling could have significant repercussions on the appointment and termination of membership in board of directors of capital companies in Europe. Authors analyse the corporate effects of the judgement in various countries from the position of the dogmatics of Company Law and emphasise the difference of the contractual and corporate relationship between the company and members of the board of directors. When analysing the ruling of the Court authors also point out the differences between public limited companies (both dual and single board systems) and limited liability companies in the position of the members of the board of directors in the area of the termination of membership in the board.https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/139danosa casecourt of justicemembership in board of directorscompany lawpublic limited companieslimited liability companies
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Siniša Petrović
Petar Ceronja
spellingShingle Siniša Petrović
Petar Ceronja
Corporate Effects Of The ‘Danosa Case’ – Is the Termination of Membership in the Board of Directors Allowed in the Case of a Pregnant Member of the Board?
Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
danosa case
court of justice
membership in board of directors
company law
public limited companies
limited liability companies
author_facet Siniša Petrović
Petar Ceronja
author_sort Siniša Petrović
title Corporate Effects Of The ‘Danosa Case’ – Is the Termination of Membership in the Board of Directors Allowed in the Case of a Pregnant Member of the Board?
title_short Corporate Effects Of The ‘Danosa Case’ – Is the Termination of Membership in the Board of Directors Allowed in the Case of a Pregnant Member of the Board?
title_full Corporate Effects Of The ‘Danosa Case’ – Is the Termination of Membership in the Board of Directors Allowed in the Case of a Pregnant Member of the Board?
title_fullStr Corporate Effects Of The ‘Danosa Case’ – Is the Termination of Membership in the Board of Directors Allowed in the Case of a Pregnant Member of the Board?
title_full_unstemmed Corporate Effects Of The ‘Danosa Case’ – Is the Termination of Membership in the Board of Directors Allowed in the Case of a Pregnant Member of the Board?
title_sort corporate effects of the ‘danosa case’ – is the termination of membership in the board of directors allowed in the case of a pregnant member of the board?
publisher University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law
series Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
issn 1845-5662
1848-9958
publishDate 2012-12-01
description The Court of Justice of the European Union (Second Chamber) pronounced on 11th November 2010 a judgement in the proceedings between Ms Dita Danosa and LKB Lizings SIA, a limited liability company, concerning the decision of the LKB general meeting of shareholders to remove Ms Danosa from her post as a member of the company's board of directors during her pregnancy. The Court's ruling could have significant repercussions on the appointment and termination of membership in board of directors of capital companies in Europe. Authors analyse the corporate effects of the judgement in various countries from the position of the dogmatics of Company Law and emphasise the difference of the contractual and corporate relationship between the company and members of the board of directors. When analysing the ruling of the Court authors also point out the differences between public limited companies (both dual and single board systems) and limited liability companies in the position of the members of the board of directors in the area of the termination of membership in the board.
topic danosa case
court of justice
membership in board of directors
company law
public limited companies
limited liability companies
url https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/139
work_keys_str_mv AT sinisapetrovic corporateeffectsofthedanosacaseistheterminationofmembershipintheboardofdirectorsallowedinthecaseofapregnantmemberoftheboard
AT petarceronja corporateeffectsofthedanosacaseistheterminationofmembershipintheboardofdirectorsallowedinthecaseofapregnantmemberoftheboard
_version_ 1724529012696416256