Transcriptional profiling differences for articular cartilage and repair tissue in equine joint surface lesions

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Full-thickness articular cartilage lesions that reach to the subchondral bone yet are restricted to the chondral compartment usually fill with a fibrocartilage-like repair tissue which is structurally and biomechanically compromised...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stromberg Arnold J, McIlwraith C Wayne, Frisbie David D, Huang Liping, Mienaltowski Michael J, Bathke Arne C, MacLeod James N
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-09-01
Series:BMC Medical Genomics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1755-8794/2/60
id doaj-afadef20697e4c27a349614d605f88cc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-afadef20697e4c27a349614d605f88cc2021-04-02T17:46:09ZengBMCBMC Medical Genomics1755-87942009-09-01216010.1186/1755-8794-2-60Transcriptional profiling differences for articular cartilage and repair tissue in equine joint surface lesionsStromberg Arnold JMcIlwraith C WayneFrisbie David DHuang LipingMienaltowski Michael JBathke Arne CMacLeod James N<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Full-thickness articular cartilage lesions that reach to the subchondral bone yet are restricted to the chondral compartment usually fill with a fibrocartilage-like repair tissue which is structurally and biomechanically compromised relative to normal articular cartilage. The objective of this study was to evaluate transcriptional differences between chondrocytes of normal articular cartilage and repair tissue cells four months post-microfracture.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Bilateral one-cm<sup>2 </sup>full-thickness defects were made in the articular surface of both distal femurs of four adult horses followed by subchondral microfracture. Four months postoperatively, repair tissue from the lesion site and grossly normal articular cartilage from within the same femorotibial joint were collected. Total RNA was isolated from the tissue samples, linearly amplified, and applied to a 9,413-probe set equine-specific cDNA microarray. Eight paired comparisons matched by limb and horse were made with a dye-swap experimental design with validation by histological analyses and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Statistical analyses revealed 3,327 (35.3%) differentially expressed probe sets. Expression of biomarkers typically associated with normal articular cartilage and fibrocartilage repair tissue corroborate earlier studies. Other changes in gene expression previously unassociated with cartilage repair were also revealed and validated by RT-qPCR.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The magnitude of divergence in transcriptional profiles between normal chondrocytes and the cells that populate repair tissue reveal substantial functional differences between these two cell populations. At the four-month postoperative time point, the relative deficiency within repair tissue of gene transcripts which typically define articular cartilage indicate that while cells occupying the lesion might be of mesenchymal origin, they have not recapitulated differentiation to the chondrogenic phenotype of normal articular chondrocytes.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1755-8794/2/60
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stromberg Arnold J
McIlwraith C Wayne
Frisbie David D
Huang Liping
Mienaltowski Michael J
Bathke Arne C
MacLeod James N
spellingShingle Stromberg Arnold J
McIlwraith C Wayne
Frisbie David D
Huang Liping
Mienaltowski Michael J
Bathke Arne C
MacLeod James N
Transcriptional profiling differences for articular cartilage and repair tissue in equine joint surface lesions
BMC Medical Genomics
author_facet Stromberg Arnold J
McIlwraith C Wayne
Frisbie David D
Huang Liping
Mienaltowski Michael J
Bathke Arne C
MacLeod James N
author_sort Stromberg Arnold J
title Transcriptional profiling differences for articular cartilage and repair tissue in equine joint surface lesions
title_short Transcriptional profiling differences for articular cartilage and repair tissue in equine joint surface lesions
title_full Transcriptional profiling differences for articular cartilage and repair tissue in equine joint surface lesions
title_fullStr Transcriptional profiling differences for articular cartilage and repair tissue in equine joint surface lesions
title_full_unstemmed Transcriptional profiling differences for articular cartilage and repair tissue in equine joint surface lesions
title_sort transcriptional profiling differences for articular cartilage and repair tissue in equine joint surface lesions
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Genomics
issn 1755-8794
publishDate 2009-09-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Full-thickness articular cartilage lesions that reach to the subchondral bone yet are restricted to the chondral compartment usually fill with a fibrocartilage-like repair tissue which is structurally and biomechanically compromised relative to normal articular cartilage. The objective of this study was to evaluate transcriptional differences between chondrocytes of normal articular cartilage and repair tissue cells four months post-microfracture.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Bilateral one-cm<sup>2 </sup>full-thickness defects were made in the articular surface of both distal femurs of four adult horses followed by subchondral microfracture. Four months postoperatively, repair tissue from the lesion site and grossly normal articular cartilage from within the same femorotibial joint were collected. Total RNA was isolated from the tissue samples, linearly amplified, and applied to a 9,413-probe set equine-specific cDNA microarray. Eight paired comparisons matched by limb and horse were made with a dye-swap experimental design with validation by histological analyses and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Statistical analyses revealed 3,327 (35.3%) differentially expressed probe sets. Expression of biomarkers typically associated with normal articular cartilage and fibrocartilage repair tissue corroborate earlier studies. Other changes in gene expression previously unassociated with cartilage repair were also revealed and validated by RT-qPCR.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The magnitude of divergence in transcriptional profiles between normal chondrocytes and the cells that populate repair tissue reveal substantial functional differences between these two cell populations. At the four-month postoperative time point, the relative deficiency within repair tissue of gene transcripts which typically define articular cartilage indicate that while cells occupying the lesion might be of mesenchymal origin, they have not recapitulated differentiation to the chondrogenic phenotype of normal articular chondrocytes.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1755-8794/2/60
work_keys_str_mv AT strombergarnoldj transcriptionalprofilingdifferencesforarticularcartilageandrepairtissueinequinejointsurfacelesions
AT mcilwraithcwayne transcriptionalprofilingdifferencesforarticularcartilageandrepairtissueinequinejointsurfacelesions
AT frisbiedavidd transcriptionalprofilingdifferencesforarticularcartilageandrepairtissueinequinejointsurfacelesions
AT huangliping transcriptionalprofilingdifferencesforarticularcartilageandrepairtissueinequinejointsurfacelesions
AT mienaltowskimichaelj transcriptionalprofilingdifferencesforarticularcartilageandrepairtissueinequinejointsurfacelesions
AT bathkearnec transcriptionalprofilingdifferencesforarticularcartilageandrepairtissueinequinejointsurfacelesions
AT macleodjamesn transcriptionalprofilingdifferencesforarticularcartilageandrepairtissueinequinejointsurfacelesions
_version_ 1721553507141550080