Malignant small round cell tumors

Malignant small round cell tumors are characterised by small, round, relatively undifferentiated cells. They generally include Ewing′s sarcoma, peripheral neuroectodermal tumor, rhabdomyosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, non-Hodgkin′s lymphoma, retinoblastoma, neuroblastoma, hepatobla...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rajwanshi Arvind, Srinivas Radhika, Upasana Gautam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2009-01-01
Series:Journal of Cytology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jcytol.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9371;year=2009;volume=26;issue=1;spage=1;epage=10;aulast=Rajwanshi
id doaj-afa7f94fbf4d4a4ca46c347a75c9e955
record_format Article
spelling doaj-afa7f94fbf4d4a4ca46c347a75c9e9552020-11-24T22:31:29ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Cytology0970-93712009-01-01261110Malignant small round cell tumorsRajwanshi ArvindSrinivas RadhikaUpasana GautamMalignant small round cell tumors are characterised by small, round, relatively undifferentiated cells. They generally include Ewing′s sarcoma, peripheral neuroectodermal tumor, rhabdomyosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, non-Hodgkin′s lymphoma, retinoblastoma, neuroblastoma, hepatoblastoma, and nephroblastoma or Wilms′ tumor. Other differential diagnoses of small round cell tumors include small cell osteogenic sarcoma, undifferentiated hepatoblastoma, granulocytic sarcoma, and intraabdominal desmoplastic small round cell tumor. Differential diagnosis of small round cell tumors is particularly difficult due to their undifferentiated or primitive character. Tumors that show good differentiation are generally easy to diagnose, but when a tumor is poorly differentiated, identification of the diagnostic, morphological features is difficult and therefore, no definitive diagnosis may be possible. As seen in several study reports, fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) has become an important modality of diagnosis for these tumors. The technique yields adequate numbers of dissociated, viable cells, making it ideally suitable for ancillary techniques. Typically, a multimodal approach is employed and the principal ancillary techniques that have been found to be useful in classification are immunohistochemistry and immunophenotyping by flow cytometry, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and electron microscopy. However, the recent characterization of chromosomal breakpoints and the corresponding genes involved in malignant small round cell tumors means that it is possible to use molecular genetic approaches for detection.http://www.jcytol.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9371;year=2009;volume=26;issue=1;spage=1;epage=10;aulast=RajwanshiFine needle aspiration cytology; malignant small round cell tumors; ancillary techniques.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rajwanshi Arvind
Srinivas Radhika
Upasana Gautam
spellingShingle Rajwanshi Arvind
Srinivas Radhika
Upasana Gautam
Malignant small round cell tumors
Journal of Cytology
Fine needle aspiration cytology; malignant small round cell tumors; ancillary techniques.
author_facet Rajwanshi Arvind
Srinivas Radhika
Upasana Gautam
author_sort Rajwanshi Arvind
title Malignant small round cell tumors
title_short Malignant small round cell tumors
title_full Malignant small round cell tumors
title_fullStr Malignant small round cell tumors
title_full_unstemmed Malignant small round cell tumors
title_sort malignant small round cell tumors
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Cytology
issn 0970-9371
publishDate 2009-01-01
description Malignant small round cell tumors are characterised by small, round, relatively undifferentiated cells. They generally include Ewing′s sarcoma, peripheral neuroectodermal tumor, rhabdomyosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, non-Hodgkin′s lymphoma, retinoblastoma, neuroblastoma, hepatoblastoma, and nephroblastoma or Wilms′ tumor. Other differential diagnoses of small round cell tumors include small cell osteogenic sarcoma, undifferentiated hepatoblastoma, granulocytic sarcoma, and intraabdominal desmoplastic small round cell tumor. Differential diagnosis of small round cell tumors is particularly difficult due to their undifferentiated or primitive character. Tumors that show good differentiation are generally easy to diagnose, but when a tumor is poorly differentiated, identification of the diagnostic, morphological features is difficult and therefore, no definitive diagnosis may be possible. As seen in several study reports, fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) has become an important modality of diagnosis for these tumors. The technique yields adequate numbers of dissociated, viable cells, making it ideally suitable for ancillary techniques. Typically, a multimodal approach is employed and the principal ancillary techniques that have been found to be useful in classification are immunohistochemistry and immunophenotyping by flow cytometry, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and electron microscopy. However, the recent characterization of chromosomal breakpoints and the corresponding genes involved in malignant small round cell tumors means that it is possible to use molecular genetic approaches for detection.
topic Fine needle aspiration cytology; malignant small round cell tumors; ancillary techniques.
url http://www.jcytol.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9371;year=2009;volume=26;issue=1;spage=1;epage=10;aulast=Rajwanshi
work_keys_str_mv AT rajwanshiarvind malignantsmallroundcelltumors
AT srinivasradhika malignantsmallroundcelltumors
AT upasanagautam malignantsmallroundcelltumors
_version_ 1725736946506924032