The role of electrophysiology in the diagnosis of radiculopathy and its comparison with magnetic resonance imaging

Objectives: Patients are frequently referred to electrophysiology laboratories by physicians from various specialties with a presumptive diagnosis of radiculopathy. Recent advances in spinal imaging techniques have led to an increase in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies in the diagnosis of ra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ebru Boluk, Cansu Uzunoğlu, Yaprak Seçil, Yusuf Kenan Çetinoğlu, Şehnaz Arıcı, Mustafa Fazıl Gelal, Tülay Kurt-İncesu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.nsnjournal.org/article.asp?issn=2636-865X;year=2021;volume=38;issue=3;spage=151;epage=157;aulast=Boluk
id doaj-afa6eb874e3a48ad8d63dff314cd593d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-afa6eb874e3a48ad8d63dff314cd593d2021-10-07T05:45:22ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsNeurological Sciences and Neurophysiology2636-865X2021-01-0138315115710.4103/nsn.nsn_14_21The role of electrophysiology in the diagnosis of radiculopathy and its comparison with magnetic resonance imagingEbru BolukCansu UzunoğluYaprak SeçilYusuf Kenan ÇetinoğluŞehnaz ArıcıMustafa Fazıl GelalTülay Kurt-İncesuObjectives: Patients are frequently referred to electrophysiology laboratories by physicians from various specialties with a presumptive diagnosis of radiculopathy. Recent advances in spinal imaging techniques have led to an increase in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies in the diagnosis of radiculopathy. This study aimed to compare these two techniques in the diagnosis of radiculopathy. Subjects and Methods: Data of 170 patients who were diagnosed as having radiculopathy using electrophysiologic studies in our laboratory by defining a myotome level and who had spinal MRI examinations in our hospital database were included in the study. Results: Among the 170 patients in our study, 40% (n = 68) had cervical radiculopathy and 60% (n = 102) had lumbar radiculopathy. In the electrophysiologic diagnosis of radiculopathy, the most sensitive root level of electromyography (EMG) was the C7 radix level in the cervical region and the L5 level in the lumbar region. Correlations between radiologic grading based on foraminal assessments for radicular involvement at the cervical region using MRI and EMG data showed fair agreement in C5, C7, and C8 radix levels (κ: 0.21–0.40), and the lumbar region showed fair agreement in L4 and L5 radix levels (κ: 0.21–0.40). Conclusion: Although EMG has indisputable importance in the diagnosis of radiculopathy, its use with MRI significantly increases the diagnostic power at most spinal levels.http://www.nsnjournal.org/article.asp?issn=2636-865X;year=2021;volume=38;issue=3;spage=151;epage=157;aulast=Bolukcervical radiculopathyelectromyographyforaminal stenosislumbar radiculopathymagnetic resonance imaging
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ebru Boluk
Cansu Uzunoğlu
Yaprak Seçil
Yusuf Kenan Çetinoğlu
Şehnaz Arıcı
Mustafa Fazıl Gelal
Tülay Kurt-İncesu
spellingShingle Ebru Boluk
Cansu Uzunoğlu
Yaprak Seçil
Yusuf Kenan Çetinoğlu
Şehnaz Arıcı
Mustafa Fazıl Gelal
Tülay Kurt-İncesu
The role of electrophysiology in the diagnosis of radiculopathy and its comparison with magnetic resonance imaging
Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology
cervical radiculopathy
electromyography
foraminal stenosis
lumbar radiculopathy
magnetic resonance imaging
author_facet Ebru Boluk
Cansu Uzunoğlu
Yaprak Seçil
Yusuf Kenan Çetinoğlu
Şehnaz Arıcı
Mustafa Fazıl Gelal
Tülay Kurt-İncesu
author_sort Ebru Boluk
title The role of electrophysiology in the diagnosis of radiculopathy and its comparison with magnetic resonance imaging
title_short The role of electrophysiology in the diagnosis of radiculopathy and its comparison with magnetic resonance imaging
title_full The role of electrophysiology in the diagnosis of radiculopathy and its comparison with magnetic resonance imaging
title_fullStr The role of electrophysiology in the diagnosis of radiculopathy and its comparison with magnetic resonance imaging
title_full_unstemmed The role of electrophysiology in the diagnosis of radiculopathy and its comparison with magnetic resonance imaging
title_sort role of electrophysiology in the diagnosis of radiculopathy and its comparison with magnetic resonance imaging
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology
issn 2636-865X
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Objectives: Patients are frequently referred to electrophysiology laboratories by physicians from various specialties with a presumptive diagnosis of radiculopathy. Recent advances in spinal imaging techniques have led to an increase in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies in the diagnosis of radiculopathy. This study aimed to compare these two techniques in the diagnosis of radiculopathy. Subjects and Methods: Data of 170 patients who were diagnosed as having radiculopathy using electrophysiologic studies in our laboratory by defining a myotome level and who had spinal MRI examinations in our hospital database were included in the study. Results: Among the 170 patients in our study, 40% (n = 68) had cervical radiculopathy and 60% (n = 102) had lumbar radiculopathy. In the electrophysiologic diagnosis of radiculopathy, the most sensitive root level of electromyography (EMG) was the C7 radix level in the cervical region and the L5 level in the lumbar region. Correlations between radiologic grading based on foraminal assessments for radicular involvement at the cervical region using MRI and EMG data showed fair agreement in C5, C7, and C8 radix levels (κ: 0.21–0.40), and the lumbar region showed fair agreement in L4 and L5 radix levels (κ: 0.21–0.40). Conclusion: Although EMG has indisputable importance in the diagnosis of radiculopathy, its use with MRI significantly increases the diagnostic power at most spinal levels.
topic cervical radiculopathy
electromyography
foraminal stenosis
lumbar radiculopathy
magnetic resonance imaging
url http://www.nsnjournal.org/article.asp?issn=2636-865X;year=2021;volume=38;issue=3;spage=151;epage=157;aulast=Boluk
work_keys_str_mv AT ebruboluk theroleofelectrophysiologyinthediagnosisofradiculopathyanditscomparisonwithmagneticresonanceimaging
AT cansuuzunoglu theroleofelectrophysiologyinthediagnosisofradiculopathyanditscomparisonwithmagneticresonanceimaging
AT yapraksecil theroleofelectrophysiologyinthediagnosisofradiculopathyanditscomparisonwithmagneticresonanceimaging
AT yusufkenancetinoglu theroleofelectrophysiologyinthediagnosisofradiculopathyanditscomparisonwithmagneticresonanceimaging
AT sehnazarıcı theroleofelectrophysiologyinthediagnosisofradiculopathyanditscomparisonwithmagneticresonanceimaging
AT mustafafazılgelal theroleofelectrophysiologyinthediagnosisofradiculopathyanditscomparisonwithmagneticresonanceimaging
AT tulaykurtincesu theroleofelectrophysiologyinthediagnosisofradiculopathyanditscomparisonwithmagneticresonanceimaging
AT ebruboluk roleofelectrophysiologyinthediagnosisofradiculopathyanditscomparisonwithmagneticresonanceimaging
AT cansuuzunoglu roleofelectrophysiologyinthediagnosisofradiculopathyanditscomparisonwithmagneticresonanceimaging
AT yapraksecil roleofelectrophysiologyinthediagnosisofradiculopathyanditscomparisonwithmagneticresonanceimaging
AT yusufkenancetinoglu roleofelectrophysiologyinthediagnosisofradiculopathyanditscomparisonwithmagneticresonanceimaging
AT sehnazarıcı roleofelectrophysiologyinthediagnosisofradiculopathyanditscomparisonwithmagneticresonanceimaging
AT mustafafazılgelal roleofelectrophysiologyinthediagnosisofradiculopathyanditscomparisonwithmagneticresonanceimaging
AT tulaykurtincesu roleofelectrophysiologyinthediagnosisofradiculopathyanditscomparisonwithmagneticresonanceimaging
_version_ 1716839676874063872