Заканата од недржавни актери во XXI век низ призмата на тројството на Клаузевиц

Today there still are fundamental issues that need to be addressed and revisited, with regards to our existing beliefs about the contemporary threats and their mutating nature, after September 11. In the past years, there have been events that did not go in the interest of the global Islamic Al-Qae...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nenad Taneski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Philosophy, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje 2013-06-01
Series:Bezbednosni Dijalozi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://periodica.fzf.ukim.edu.mk/sd/SD%2004.1%20(2013)/SD%2004.1.10%20Taneski,%20N.%20-%20Zakanata%20od%20nedrzavni%20akteri%20vo%20XXI%20vek.pdf
id doaj-af8837c471a34f73aad612c8fb85cf40
record_format Article
spelling doaj-af8837c471a34f73aad612c8fb85cf402021-04-13T09:22:28ZengFaculty of Philosophy, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in SkopjeBezbednosni Dijalozi1857-71721857-80552013-06-0141107122Заканата од недржавни актери во XXI век низ призмата на тројството на КлаузевицNenad Taneski0Military Academy ‘’General Mihailo Apostolski’’ - SkopjeToday there still are fundamental issues that need to be addressed and revisited, with regards to our existing beliefs about the contemporary threats and their mutating nature, after September 11. In the past years, there have been events that did not go in the interest of the global Islamic Al-Qaeda movement. The wave of popular uprisings known as Arab Spring resulted in toppling long-year dictatorships in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and Yemen. Then in May 2011, with the killing of Bin Laden, and later of other high-ranking leaders, Al Qaeda faced the most dramatic defeat by losing its ideological leader. However, twelve years after the beginning of the new millennium and the most evident defeat on all open fronts by the western powers, this asymmetric non-state enemy is still not undefeated. What are its long-term objectives? Is it a global organisation, network, insurgency movement, or ideology? What is their center of gravitation? Is it still necessary to use the term ‘enemy’ and to detect it in the face of the Middle East states, and as a key factor for an investment of huge military and civil resources in dealing with it and still using the term ‘violent extremism? This paper is aimed to give a response to some of these questions with a view to understanding why the military doctrines that existed so far and the conventional methods are not efficient in dealing with contemporary non-state threats and that the need to refine them is obvious. http://periodica.fzf.ukim.edu.mk/sd/SD%2004.1%20(2013)/SD%2004.1.10%20Taneski,%20N.%20-%20Zakanata%20od%20nedrzavni%20akteri%20vo%20XXI%20vek.pdfnon-state actorsglobal terrorismislamismasymmetric threatsal quaeda
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nenad Taneski
spellingShingle Nenad Taneski
Заканата од недржавни актери во XXI век низ призмата на тројството на Клаузевиц
Bezbednosni Dijalozi
non-state actors
global terrorism
islamism
asymmetric threats
al quaeda
author_facet Nenad Taneski
author_sort Nenad Taneski
title Заканата од недржавни актери во XXI век низ призмата на тројството на Клаузевиц
title_short Заканата од недржавни актери во XXI век низ призмата на тројството на Клаузевиц
title_full Заканата од недржавни актери во XXI век низ призмата на тројството на Клаузевиц
title_fullStr Заканата од недржавни актери во XXI век низ призмата на тројството на Клаузевиц
title_full_unstemmed Заканата од недржавни актери во XXI век низ призмата на тројството на Клаузевиц
title_sort заканата од недржавни актери во xxi век низ призмата на тројството на клаузевиц
publisher Faculty of Philosophy, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje
series Bezbednosni Dijalozi
issn 1857-7172
1857-8055
publishDate 2013-06-01
description Today there still are fundamental issues that need to be addressed and revisited, with regards to our existing beliefs about the contemporary threats and their mutating nature, after September 11. In the past years, there have been events that did not go in the interest of the global Islamic Al-Qaeda movement. The wave of popular uprisings known as Arab Spring resulted in toppling long-year dictatorships in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and Yemen. Then in May 2011, with the killing of Bin Laden, and later of other high-ranking leaders, Al Qaeda faced the most dramatic defeat by losing its ideological leader. However, twelve years after the beginning of the new millennium and the most evident defeat on all open fronts by the western powers, this asymmetric non-state enemy is still not undefeated. What are its long-term objectives? Is it a global organisation, network, insurgency movement, or ideology? What is their center of gravitation? Is it still necessary to use the term ‘enemy’ and to detect it in the face of the Middle East states, and as a key factor for an investment of huge military and civil resources in dealing with it and still using the term ‘violent extremism? This paper is aimed to give a response to some of these questions with a view to understanding why the military doctrines that existed so far and the conventional methods are not efficient in dealing with contemporary non-state threats and that the need to refine them is obvious.
topic non-state actors
global terrorism
islamism
asymmetric threats
al quaeda
url http://periodica.fzf.ukim.edu.mk/sd/SD%2004.1%20(2013)/SD%2004.1.10%20Taneski,%20N.%20-%20Zakanata%20od%20nedrzavni%20akteri%20vo%20XXI%20vek.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nenadtaneski zakanataodnedržavniakterivoxxiveknizprizmatanatroǰstvotonaklauzevic
_version_ 1721528946152964096