Construction Delay Analysis Techniques—A Review of Application Issues and Improvement Needs
The time for performance of a project is usually of the essence to the employer and the contractor. This has made it quite imperative for contracting parties to analyse project delays for purposes of making right decisions on potential time and/or cost compensation claims. Over the years, existing d...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2013-07-01
|
Series: | Buildings |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/3/3/506 |
id |
doaj-af87638a389c484eac3254af80b91c58 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-af87638a389c484eac3254af80b91c582020-11-24T23:14:21ZengMDPI AGBuildings2075-53092013-07-013350653110.3390/buildings3030506Construction Delay Analysis Techniques—A Review of Application Issues and Improvement NeedsNuhu BraimahThe time for performance of a project is usually of the essence to the employer and the contractor. This has made it quite imperative for contracting parties to analyse project delays for purposes of making right decisions on potential time and/or cost compensation claims. Over the years, existing delay analysis techniques (DATs) for aiding this decision-making have been helpful but have not succeeded in curbing the high incidence of disputes associated with delay claims resolutions. A major source of the disputes lies with the limitations and capabilities of the techniques in their practical use. Developing a good knowledge of these aspects of the techniques is of paramount importance in understanding the real problematic issues involved and their improvement needs. This paper seeks to develop such knowledge and understanding (as part of a wider research work) via: an evaluation of the most common DATs based on a case study, a review of the key relevant issues often not addressed by the techniques, and the necessary improvements needs. The evaluation confirmed that the various techniques yield different analysis results for the same delay claims scenario, mainly due to their unique application procedures. The issues that are often ignored in the analysis but would also affect delay analysis results are: functionality of the programming software employed for the analysis, resource loading and levelling requirements, resolving concurrent delays, and delay-pacing strategy. Improvement needs by way of incorporating these issues in the analysis and focusing on them in future research work are the key recommendations of the study.http://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/3/3/506delay analysisconstruction claimsextension of timeschedulingdamages |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nuhu Braimah |
spellingShingle |
Nuhu Braimah Construction Delay Analysis Techniques—A Review of Application Issues and Improvement Needs Buildings delay analysis construction claims extension of time scheduling damages |
author_facet |
Nuhu Braimah |
author_sort |
Nuhu Braimah |
title |
Construction Delay Analysis Techniques—A Review of Application Issues and Improvement Needs |
title_short |
Construction Delay Analysis Techniques—A Review of Application Issues and Improvement Needs |
title_full |
Construction Delay Analysis Techniques—A Review of Application Issues and Improvement Needs |
title_fullStr |
Construction Delay Analysis Techniques—A Review of Application Issues and Improvement Needs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Construction Delay Analysis Techniques—A Review of Application Issues and Improvement Needs |
title_sort |
construction delay analysis techniques—a review of application issues and improvement needs |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Buildings |
issn |
2075-5309 |
publishDate |
2013-07-01 |
description |
The time for performance of a project is usually of the essence to the employer and the contractor. This has made it quite imperative for contracting parties to analyse project delays for purposes of making right decisions on potential time and/or cost compensation claims. Over the years, existing delay analysis techniques (DATs) for aiding this decision-making have been helpful but have not succeeded in curbing the high incidence of disputes associated with delay claims resolutions. A major source of the disputes lies with the limitations and capabilities of the techniques in their practical use. Developing a good knowledge of these aspects of the techniques is of paramount importance in understanding the real problematic issues involved and their improvement needs. This paper seeks to develop such knowledge and understanding (as part of a wider research work) via: an evaluation of the most common DATs based on a case study, a review of the key relevant issues often not addressed by the techniques, and the necessary improvements needs. The evaluation confirmed that the various techniques yield different analysis results for the same delay claims scenario, mainly due to their unique application procedures. The issues that are often ignored in the analysis but would also affect delay analysis results are: functionality of the programming software employed for the analysis, resource loading and levelling requirements, resolving concurrent delays, and delay-pacing strategy. Improvement needs by way of incorporating these issues in the analysis and focusing on them in future research work are the key recommendations of the study. |
topic |
delay analysis construction claims extension of time scheduling damages |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/3/3/506 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nuhubraimah constructiondelayanalysistechniquesareviewofapplicationissuesandimprovementneeds |
_version_ |
1725594851298246656 |