Individual Objective and Subjective Fixation Disparity in Near Vision.

Binocular vision refers to the integration of images in the two eyes for improved visual performance and depth perception. One aspect of binocular vision is the fixation disparity, which is a suboptimal condition in individuals with respect to binocular eye movement control and subsequent neural pro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wolfgang Jaschinski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5279731?pdf=render
id doaj-af5854f80d0340afb93a1ff48a392d59
record_format Article
spelling doaj-af5854f80d0340afb93a1ff48a392d592020-11-25T01:46:08ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01121e017019010.1371/journal.pone.0170190Individual Objective and Subjective Fixation Disparity in Near Vision.Wolfgang JaschinskiBinocular vision refers to the integration of images in the two eyes for improved visual performance and depth perception. One aspect of binocular vision is the fixation disparity, which is a suboptimal condition in individuals with respect to binocular eye movement control and subsequent neural processing. The objective fixation disparity refers to the vergence angle between the visual axes, which is measured with eye trackers. Subjective fixation disparity is tested with two monocular nonius lines which indicate the physical nonius separation required for perceived alignment. Subjective and objective fixation disparity represent the different physiological mechanisms of motor and sensory fusion, but the precise relation between these two is still unclear. This study measures both types of fixation disparity at viewing distances of 40, 30, and 24 cm while observers fixated a central stationary fusion target. 20 young adult subjects with normal binocular vision were tested repeatedly to investigate individual differences. For heterophoria and subjective fixation disparity, this study replicated that the binocular system does not properly adjust to near targets: outward (exo) deviations typically increase as the viewing distance is shortened. This exo proximity effect-however-was not found for objective fixation disparity, which-on the average-was zero. But individuals can have reliable outward (exo) or inward (eso) vergence errors. Cases with eso objective fixation disparity tend to have less exo states of subjective fixation disparity and heterophoria. In summary, the two types of fixation disparity seem to respond in a different way when the viewing distance is shortened. Motor and sensory fusion-as reflected by objective and subjective fixation disparity-exhibit complex interactions that may differ between individuals (eso versus exo) and vary with viewing distance (far versus near vision).http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5279731?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wolfgang Jaschinski
spellingShingle Wolfgang Jaschinski
Individual Objective and Subjective Fixation Disparity in Near Vision.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Wolfgang Jaschinski
author_sort Wolfgang Jaschinski
title Individual Objective and Subjective Fixation Disparity in Near Vision.
title_short Individual Objective and Subjective Fixation Disparity in Near Vision.
title_full Individual Objective and Subjective Fixation Disparity in Near Vision.
title_fullStr Individual Objective and Subjective Fixation Disparity in Near Vision.
title_full_unstemmed Individual Objective and Subjective Fixation Disparity in Near Vision.
title_sort individual objective and subjective fixation disparity in near vision.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Binocular vision refers to the integration of images in the two eyes for improved visual performance and depth perception. One aspect of binocular vision is the fixation disparity, which is a suboptimal condition in individuals with respect to binocular eye movement control and subsequent neural processing. The objective fixation disparity refers to the vergence angle between the visual axes, which is measured with eye trackers. Subjective fixation disparity is tested with two monocular nonius lines which indicate the physical nonius separation required for perceived alignment. Subjective and objective fixation disparity represent the different physiological mechanisms of motor and sensory fusion, but the precise relation between these two is still unclear. This study measures both types of fixation disparity at viewing distances of 40, 30, and 24 cm while observers fixated a central stationary fusion target. 20 young adult subjects with normal binocular vision were tested repeatedly to investigate individual differences. For heterophoria and subjective fixation disparity, this study replicated that the binocular system does not properly adjust to near targets: outward (exo) deviations typically increase as the viewing distance is shortened. This exo proximity effect-however-was not found for objective fixation disparity, which-on the average-was zero. But individuals can have reliable outward (exo) or inward (eso) vergence errors. Cases with eso objective fixation disparity tend to have less exo states of subjective fixation disparity and heterophoria. In summary, the two types of fixation disparity seem to respond in a different way when the viewing distance is shortened. Motor and sensory fusion-as reflected by objective and subjective fixation disparity-exhibit complex interactions that may differ between individuals (eso versus exo) and vary with viewing distance (far versus near vision).
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5279731?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT wolfgangjaschinski individualobjectiveandsubjectivefixationdisparityinnearvision
_version_ 1725020703682461696