NOx Emission Flux Measurements with Multiple Mobile-DOAS Instruments in Beijing

NO<sub>X</sub> (NO<sub>X</sub> = NO + NO<sub>2</sub>) emissions measurements in Beijing are of great significance because they can aid in understanding how NO<sub>X</sub> pollution develops in mega-cities throughout China. However, NO<sub>X</s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yeyuan Huang, Ang Li, Pinhua Xie, Zhaokun Hu, Jin Xu, Xiaoyi Fang, Hongmei Ren, Xiaomei Li, Bing Dang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-08-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/16/2527
Description
Summary:NO<sub>X</sub> (NO<sub>X</sub> = NO + NO<sub>2</sub>) emissions measurements in Beijing are of great significance because they can aid in understanding how NO<sub>X</sub> pollution develops in mega-cities throughout China. However, NO<sub>X</sub> emissions in mega-cities are difficult to measure due to changes in wind patterns and moving sources on roads during measurement. To obtain good spatial coverage on different ring roads in Beijing over a short amount of time, two mobile differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS) instruments were used to measure NO<sub>X</sub> emission flux from April 18th to 26th, 2018. In addition, a wind profile radar provided simultaneous wind field measurements for altitudes between 50 m and 1 km for each ring road measurement. We first determined NO<sub>X</sub> emission flux of different ring roads using wind field averages from measured wind data. The results showed that the NO<sub>X</sub> emission flux of Beijing’s fifth ring road, which represented the urban part, varied from (19.29 ± 5.26) × 10<sup>24</sup> molec./s to (36.46 ± 12.86) × 10<sup>24</sup> molec./s. On April 20th, NO<sub>X</sub> emission flux for the third ring was slightly higher than the fourth ring because the two ring roads were measured at different time periods. We then analyzed the NO<sub>X</sub> emission flux error budget and error sensitivity. The main error source was the wind field uncertainty. For some measurements, the main emission flux error source was either wind speed uncertainty or wind direction uncertainty, but not both. As Beijing’s NO<sub>X</sub> emissions came from road vehicle exhaust, we found that emission flux error had a more diverse sensitivity to wind direction uncertainty, which improved our knowledge on this topic. The NO<sub>X</sub> emission flux error sensitivity study indicated that more accurate measurements of the wind field are crucial for effective NO<sub>X</sub> emission flux measurements in Chinese mega-cities. Obtaining actual time and high resolved wind measurements is an advantage for mega-cities’ NO<sub>X</sub> emission flux measurements. The emission flux errors caused by wind direction and wind speed uncertainties were clearly distinguished. Other sensitivity studies indicated that NO<sub>X</sub>/NO<sub>2</sub> ratio uncertainty dominated flux errors when the NO<sub>X</sub>/NO<sub>2</sub> ratio uncertainty was >0.4. Using two mobile-DOAS and wind profile radars to measure NOx emission flux improved the quality of the emission flux measuring results. This approach could be applied to many other mega-cities in China and in others countries.
ISSN:2072-4292