Status of national policy on companion of choice at birth in Latin America and the Caribbean: Gaps and challenges

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a companion of choice during labor and birth, to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes and women’s satisfaction with health services. To better understand the status of companion of choice in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), an online survey was...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bremen De Mucio, Lorena Binfa, Jovita Ortiz, Anayda Portela
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pan American Health Organization 2020-03-01
Series:Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
Subjects:
Online Access:http://iris.paho.org/xmlui/handle/123456789/51863
id doaj-af36f0b2a1d248ec81c950e7bec3922b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-af36f0b2a1d248ec81c950e7bec3922b2020-11-25T02:27:29ZengPan American Health OrganizationRevista Panamericana de Salud Pública1020-49891680-53482020-03-0144191610.26633/RPSP.2020.19rpspStatus of national policy on companion of choice at birth in Latin America and the Caribbean: Gaps and challengesBremen De Mucio0Lorena Binfa1Jovita Ortiz2Anayda Portela3Latin American Center for Perinatology, Women and Reproductive Health, Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization, Montevideo, Uruguay.Departamento de Promoción de la Salud de la Mujer y el Recién Nacido, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.Departamento de Promoción de la Salud de la Mujer y el Recién Nacido, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a companion of choice during labor and birth, to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes and women’s satisfaction with health services. To better understand the status of companion of choice in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), an online survey was conducted with members of a midwifery virtual community of practice and with key informants, aiming to identify: 1) existing regulatory instruments related to companion of choice in the countries where the members are practicing; and, 2) key characteristics of implementation of companion of choice, where regulation exists. Responses (n = 112) were received from representatives of 20 of the 43 countries of LAC. Respondents reported existence of a national policy or legislation in seven countries, ministerial norms or institutional protocols in five countries, and no existing policy/protocol in eight countries. Respondents from the same country often provided contradictory responses. Responses differed from information provided by ministries of health in a WHO-led global policy survey in 11 instances. These variations may reflect that midwives were not always aware of the national policy/guideline in their country. We propose that a more robust effort should be undertaken to understand the status of companion of choice for labor and birth in LAC countries, at national, regional, and local level, in public and private facilities. It is important to know if policies exist, at what level of the system, and if key stakeholders, maternity-care health providers, and women are aware of their existence. Efforts should also be made to understand barriers to implementing companion of choice.http://iris.paho.org/xmlui/handle/123456789/51863patient satisfactionmidwiferymaternal health serviceslatin americacaribbean region
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bremen De Mucio
Lorena Binfa
Jovita Ortiz
Anayda Portela
spellingShingle Bremen De Mucio
Lorena Binfa
Jovita Ortiz
Anayda Portela
Status of national policy on companion of choice at birth in Latin America and the Caribbean: Gaps and challenges
Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
patient satisfaction
midwifery
maternal health services
latin america
caribbean region
author_facet Bremen De Mucio
Lorena Binfa
Jovita Ortiz
Anayda Portela
author_sort Bremen De Mucio
title Status of national policy on companion of choice at birth in Latin America and the Caribbean: Gaps and challenges
title_short Status of national policy on companion of choice at birth in Latin America and the Caribbean: Gaps and challenges
title_full Status of national policy on companion of choice at birth in Latin America and the Caribbean: Gaps and challenges
title_fullStr Status of national policy on companion of choice at birth in Latin America and the Caribbean: Gaps and challenges
title_full_unstemmed Status of national policy on companion of choice at birth in Latin America and the Caribbean: Gaps and challenges
title_sort status of national policy on companion of choice at birth in latin america and the caribbean: gaps and challenges
publisher Pan American Health Organization
series Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
issn 1020-4989
1680-5348
publishDate 2020-03-01
description The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a companion of choice during labor and birth, to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes and women’s satisfaction with health services. To better understand the status of companion of choice in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), an online survey was conducted with members of a midwifery virtual community of practice and with key informants, aiming to identify: 1) existing regulatory instruments related to companion of choice in the countries where the members are practicing; and, 2) key characteristics of implementation of companion of choice, where regulation exists. Responses (n = 112) were received from representatives of 20 of the 43 countries of LAC. Respondents reported existence of a national policy or legislation in seven countries, ministerial norms or institutional protocols in five countries, and no existing policy/protocol in eight countries. Respondents from the same country often provided contradictory responses. Responses differed from information provided by ministries of health in a WHO-led global policy survey in 11 instances. These variations may reflect that midwives were not always aware of the national policy/guideline in their country. We propose that a more robust effort should be undertaken to understand the status of companion of choice for labor and birth in LAC countries, at national, regional, and local level, in public and private facilities. It is important to know if policies exist, at what level of the system, and if key stakeholders, maternity-care health providers, and women are aware of their existence. Efforts should also be made to understand barriers to implementing companion of choice.
topic patient satisfaction
midwifery
maternal health services
latin america
caribbean region
url http://iris.paho.org/xmlui/handle/123456789/51863
work_keys_str_mv AT bremendemucio statusofnationalpolicyoncompanionofchoiceatbirthinlatinamericaandthecaribbeangapsandchallenges
AT lorenabinfa statusofnationalpolicyoncompanionofchoiceatbirthinlatinamericaandthecaribbeangapsandchallenges
AT jovitaortiz statusofnationalpolicyoncompanionofchoiceatbirthinlatinamericaandthecaribbeangapsandchallenges
AT anaydaportela statusofnationalpolicyoncompanionofchoiceatbirthinlatinamericaandthecaribbeangapsandchallenges
_version_ 1724842885710348288