Status of national policy on companion of choice at birth in Latin America and the Caribbean: Gaps and challenges
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a companion of choice during labor and birth, to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes and women’s satisfaction with health services. To better understand the status of companion of choice in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), an online survey was...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Pan American Health Organization
2020-03-01
|
Series: | Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://iris.paho.org/xmlui/handle/123456789/51863 |
id |
doaj-af36f0b2a1d248ec81c950e7bec3922b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-af36f0b2a1d248ec81c950e7bec3922b2020-11-25T02:27:29ZengPan American Health OrganizationRevista Panamericana de Salud Pública1020-49891680-53482020-03-0144191610.26633/RPSP.2020.19rpspStatus of national policy on companion of choice at birth in Latin America and the Caribbean: Gaps and challengesBremen De Mucio0Lorena Binfa1Jovita Ortiz2Anayda Portela3Latin American Center for Perinatology, Women and Reproductive Health, Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization, Montevideo, Uruguay.Departamento de Promoción de la Salud de la Mujer y el Recién Nacido, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.Departamento de Promoción de la Salud de la Mujer y el Recién Nacido, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a companion of choice during labor and birth, to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes and women’s satisfaction with health services. To better understand the status of companion of choice in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), an online survey was conducted with members of a midwifery virtual community of practice and with key informants, aiming to identify: 1) existing regulatory instruments related to companion of choice in the countries where the members are practicing; and, 2) key characteristics of implementation of companion of choice, where regulation exists. Responses (n = 112) were received from representatives of 20 of the 43 countries of LAC. Respondents reported existence of a national policy or legislation in seven countries, ministerial norms or institutional protocols in five countries, and no existing policy/protocol in eight countries. Respondents from the same country often provided contradictory responses. Responses differed from information provided by ministries of health in a WHO-led global policy survey in 11 instances. These variations may reflect that midwives were not always aware of the national policy/guideline in their country. We propose that a more robust effort should be undertaken to understand the status of companion of choice for labor and birth in LAC countries, at national, regional, and local level, in public and private facilities. It is important to know if policies exist, at what level of the system, and if key stakeholders, maternity-care health providers, and women are aware of their existence. Efforts should also be made to understand barriers to implementing companion of choice.http://iris.paho.org/xmlui/handle/123456789/51863patient satisfactionmidwiferymaternal health serviceslatin americacaribbean region |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Bremen De Mucio Lorena Binfa Jovita Ortiz Anayda Portela |
spellingShingle |
Bremen De Mucio Lorena Binfa Jovita Ortiz Anayda Portela Status of national policy on companion of choice at birth in Latin America and the Caribbean: Gaps and challenges Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública patient satisfaction midwifery maternal health services latin america caribbean region |
author_facet |
Bremen De Mucio Lorena Binfa Jovita Ortiz Anayda Portela |
author_sort |
Bremen De Mucio |
title |
Status of national policy on companion of choice at birth in Latin America and the Caribbean: Gaps and challenges |
title_short |
Status of national policy on companion of choice at birth in Latin America and the Caribbean: Gaps and challenges |
title_full |
Status of national policy on companion of choice at birth in Latin America and the Caribbean: Gaps and challenges |
title_fullStr |
Status of national policy on companion of choice at birth in Latin America and the Caribbean: Gaps and challenges |
title_full_unstemmed |
Status of national policy on companion of choice at birth in Latin America and the Caribbean: Gaps and challenges |
title_sort |
status of national policy on companion of choice at birth in latin america and the caribbean: gaps and challenges |
publisher |
Pan American Health Organization |
series |
Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública |
issn |
1020-4989 1680-5348 |
publishDate |
2020-03-01 |
description |
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a companion of choice during labor and birth, to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes and women’s satisfaction with health services. To better understand the status of companion of choice in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), an online survey was conducted with members of a midwifery virtual community of practice and with key informants, aiming to identify: 1) existing regulatory instruments related to companion of choice in the countries where the members are practicing; and, 2) key characteristics of implementation of companion of choice, where regulation exists. Responses (n = 112) were received from representatives of 20 of the 43 countries of LAC. Respondents reported existence of a national policy or legislation in seven countries, ministerial norms or institutional protocols in five countries, and no existing policy/protocol in eight countries. Respondents from the same country often provided contradictory responses. Responses differed from information provided by ministries of health in a WHO-led global policy survey in 11 instances. These variations may reflect that midwives were not always aware of the national policy/guideline in their country. We propose that a more robust effort should be undertaken to understand the status of companion of choice for labor and birth in LAC countries, at national, regional, and local level, in public and private facilities. It is important to know if policies exist, at what level of the system, and if key stakeholders, maternity-care health providers, and women are aware of their existence. Efforts should also be made to understand barriers to implementing companion of choice. |
topic |
patient satisfaction midwifery maternal health services latin america caribbean region |
url |
http://iris.paho.org/xmlui/handle/123456789/51863 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bremendemucio statusofnationalpolicyoncompanionofchoiceatbirthinlatinamericaandthecaribbeangapsandchallenges AT lorenabinfa statusofnationalpolicyoncompanionofchoiceatbirthinlatinamericaandthecaribbeangapsandchallenges AT jovitaortiz statusofnationalpolicyoncompanionofchoiceatbirthinlatinamericaandthecaribbeangapsandchallenges AT anaydaportela statusofnationalpolicyoncompanionofchoiceatbirthinlatinamericaandthecaribbeangapsandchallenges |
_version_ |
1724842885710348288 |