The Spirit of Laws is Not Universal: Alternatives to the Enforcement Paradigm for Human Rights

Drawing on the contested legacy of Montesquieu in 'The Spirit of the Laws', this essay questions the efficacy of state-centric legality in the enforcement of human rights, and proposes an alternative approach of cultural transformation and political mobilization. The author begins by explo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2016-10-01
Series:Tilburg Law Review
Online Access:https://tilburglawreview.com/articles/109
id doaj-af121905052048dabec7daab40246f73
record_format Article
spelling doaj-af121905052048dabec7daab40246f732020-11-25T03:30:22ZengUbiquity PressTilburg Law Review2211-25452016-10-0121225527410.1163/22112596-02102008103The Spirit of Laws is Not Universal: Alternatives to the Enforcement Paradigm for Human RightsAbdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im0Charles Howard Candler Professor of Law, Emory University School of Law, AtlantaDrawing on the contested legacy of Montesquieu in 'The Spirit of the Laws', this essay questions the efficacy of state-centric legality in the enforcement of human rights, and proposes an alternative approach of cultural transformation and political mobilization. The author begins by exploring whether Montesquieu’s thought may have inspired European powers to seek to impose his model of the nation-state and its positive laws through global colonial projects. Second, the author discusses the structural inadequacy of the current treaty-based state-centric enforcement paradigm while highlighting the viability of a universally realistic alternative of cultural transformation and political mobilization for the implementation of consensus-based human rights norms. Third, the author explores his proposed people-centered alternative to the state-centric enforcement model for human rights. This paradigm shift is necessary because the current legalistic approach has totally failed in providing any protection of human rights for the vast majority of humanity around the world.https://tilburglawreview.com/articles/109
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im
spellingShingle Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im
The Spirit of Laws is Not Universal: Alternatives to the Enforcement Paradigm for Human Rights
Tilburg Law Review
author_facet Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im
author_sort Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im
title The Spirit of Laws is Not Universal: Alternatives to the Enforcement Paradigm for Human Rights
title_short The Spirit of Laws is Not Universal: Alternatives to the Enforcement Paradigm for Human Rights
title_full The Spirit of Laws is Not Universal: Alternatives to the Enforcement Paradigm for Human Rights
title_fullStr The Spirit of Laws is Not Universal: Alternatives to the Enforcement Paradigm for Human Rights
title_full_unstemmed The Spirit of Laws is Not Universal: Alternatives to the Enforcement Paradigm for Human Rights
title_sort spirit of laws is not universal: alternatives to the enforcement paradigm for human rights
publisher Ubiquity Press
series Tilburg Law Review
issn 2211-2545
publishDate 2016-10-01
description Drawing on the contested legacy of Montesquieu in 'The Spirit of the Laws', this essay questions the efficacy of state-centric legality in the enforcement of human rights, and proposes an alternative approach of cultural transformation and political mobilization. The author begins by exploring whether Montesquieu’s thought may have inspired European powers to seek to impose his model of the nation-state and its positive laws through global colonial projects. Second, the author discusses the structural inadequacy of the current treaty-based state-centric enforcement paradigm while highlighting the viability of a universally realistic alternative of cultural transformation and political mobilization for the implementation of consensus-based human rights norms. Third, the author explores his proposed people-centered alternative to the state-centric enforcement model for human rights. This paradigm shift is necessary because the current legalistic approach has totally failed in providing any protection of human rights for the vast majority of humanity around the world.
url https://tilburglawreview.com/articles/109
work_keys_str_mv AT abdullahiahmedannaim thespiritoflawsisnotuniversalalternativestotheenforcementparadigmforhumanrights
AT abdullahiahmedannaim spiritoflawsisnotuniversalalternativestotheenforcementparadigmforhumanrights
_version_ 1724575926653550592