Diffusion Modelling Reveals the Decision Making Processes Underlying Negative Judgement Bias in Rats.

Human decision making is modified by emotional state. Rodents exhibit similar biases during interpretation of ambiguous cues that can be altered by affective state manipulations. In this study, the impact of negative affective state on judgement bias in rats was measured using an ambiguous-cue inter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Claire A Hales, Emma S J Robinson, Conor J Houghton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4811525?pdf=render
id doaj-aefec6cb5feb4be2b260bbc69f652064
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aefec6cb5feb4be2b260bbc69f6520642020-11-25T01:52:31ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01113e015259210.1371/journal.pone.0152592Diffusion Modelling Reveals the Decision Making Processes Underlying Negative Judgement Bias in Rats.Claire A HalesEmma S J RobinsonConor J HoughtonHuman decision making is modified by emotional state. Rodents exhibit similar biases during interpretation of ambiguous cues that can be altered by affective state manipulations. In this study, the impact of negative affective state on judgement bias in rats was measured using an ambiguous-cue interpretation task. Acute treatment with an anxiogenic drug (FG7142), and chronic restraint stress and social isolation both induced a bias towards more negative interpretation of the ambiguous cue. The diffusion model was fit to behavioural data to allow further analysis of the underlying decision making processes. To uncover the way in which parameters vary together in relation to affective state manipulations, independent component analysis was conducted on rate of information accumulation and distances to decision threshold parameters for control data. Results from this analysis were applied to parameters from negative affective state manipulations. These projected components were compared to control components to reveal the changes in decision making processes that are due to affective state manipulations. Negative affective bias in rodents induced by either FG7142 or chronic stress is due to a combination of more negative interpretation of the ambiguous cue, reduced anticipation of the high reward and increased anticipation of the low reward.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4811525?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Claire A Hales
Emma S J Robinson
Conor J Houghton
spellingShingle Claire A Hales
Emma S J Robinson
Conor J Houghton
Diffusion Modelling Reveals the Decision Making Processes Underlying Negative Judgement Bias in Rats.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Claire A Hales
Emma S J Robinson
Conor J Houghton
author_sort Claire A Hales
title Diffusion Modelling Reveals the Decision Making Processes Underlying Negative Judgement Bias in Rats.
title_short Diffusion Modelling Reveals the Decision Making Processes Underlying Negative Judgement Bias in Rats.
title_full Diffusion Modelling Reveals the Decision Making Processes Underlying Negative Judgement Bias in Rats.
title_fullStr Diffusion Modelling Reveals the Decision Making Processes Underlying Negative Judgement Bias in Rats.
title_full_unstemmed Diffusion Modelling Reveals the Decision Making Processes Underlying Negative Judgement Bias in Rats.
title_sort diffusion modelling reveals the decision making processes underlying negative judgement bias in rats.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Human decision making is modified by emotional state. Rodents exhibit similar biases during interpretation of ambiguous cues that can be altered by affective state manipulations. In this study, the impact of negative affective state on judgement bias in rats was measured using an ambiguous-cue interpretation task. Acute treatment with an anxiogenic drug (FG7142), and chronic restraint stress and social isolation both induced a bias towards more negative interpretation of the ambiguous cue. The diffusion model was fit to behavioural data to allow further analysis of the underlying decision making processes. To uncover the way in which parameters vary together in relation to affective state manipulations, independent component analysis was conducted on rate of information accumulation and distances to decision threshold parameters for control data. Results from this analysis were applied to parameters from negative affective state manipulations. These projected components were compared to control components to reveal the changes in decision making processes that are due to affective state manipulations. Negative affective bias in rodents induced by either FG7142 or chronic stress is due to a combination of more negative interpretation of the ambiguous cue, reduced anticipation of the high reward and increased anticipation of the low reward.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4811525?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT claireahales diffusionmodellingrevealsthedecisionmakingprocessesunderlyingnegativejudgementbiasinrats
AT emmasjrobinson diffusionmodellingrevealsthedecisionmakingprocessesunderlyingnegativejudgementbiasinrats
AT conorjhoughton diffusionmodellingrevealsthedecisionmakingprocessesunderlyingnegativejudgementbiasinrats
_version_ 1724994807557783552