Numerical Study of Formation of a Series of Bubbles from an Orifice by Applying Dynamic Contact Angle Model

The dynamic contact angle model is applied in the formation process of a series of bubbles from Period-I regime to Period-II regime by using the VOF method on a 2D axisymmetric domain. In the first process of the current research, the dynamic contact angle model is validated by comparing the numeric...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nan Chen, Xiyu Chen, Antonio Delgado
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2020-01-01
Series:Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5213234
id doaj-aef4e27034ef4bd08d5c9b2d0a3877de
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aef4e27034ef4bd08d5c9b2d0a3877de2020-11-25T04:07:56ZengHindawi LimitedAdvances in Materials Science and Engineering1687-84422020-01-01202010.1155/2020/52132345213234Numerical Study of Formation of a Series of Bubbles from an Orifice by Applying Dynamic Contact Angle ModelNan Chen0Xiyu Chen1Antonio Delgado2Institute of Fluid MechanicsInstitute of Fluid MechanicsInstitute of Fluid MechanicsThe dynamic contact angle model is applied in the formation process of a series of bubbles from Period-I regime to Period-II regime by using the VOF method on a 2D axisymmetric domain. In the first process of the current research, the dynamic contact angle model is validated by comparing the numerical results to the experimental data. Good agreement in terms of bubble shape and bubble detachment time is observed from a lower flow rate Q = 150.8 cm3/min (Re = 54.77, Period-I regime) to a higher flow rate Q = 603.2 cm3/min (Re = 219.07, Period-III regime). The comparison between the dynamic contact angle model and the static contact angle model is also performed. It is observed that the static contact angle model can obtain similar results as the dynamic contact angle model only for smaller gas flow rates (Q ≤ 150.8 cm3/min and Re ≤ 54.77)). For higher gas flow rates, the static contact angle model cannot produce good results as the dynamic contact angle model and has larger relative errors in terms of bubble detachment time and bubble shape.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5213234
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nan Chen
Xiyu Chen
Antonio Delgado
spellingShingle Nan Chen
Xiyu Chen
Antonio Delgado
Numerical Study of Formation of a Series of Bubbles from an Orifice by Applying Dynamic Contact Angle Model
Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
author_facet Nan Chen
Xiyu Chen
Antonio Delgado
author_sort Nan Chen
title Numerical Study of Formation of a Series of Bubbles from an Orifice by Applying Dynamic Contact Angle Model
title_short Numerical Study of Formation of a Series of Bubbles from an Orifice by Applying Dynamic Contact Angle Model
title_full Numerical Study of Formation of a Series of Bubbles from an Orifice by Applying Dynamic Contact Angle Model
title_fullStr Numerical Study of Formation of a Series of Bubbles from an Orifice by Applying Dynamic Contact Angle Model
title_full_unstemmed Numerical Study of Formation of a Series of Bubbles from an Orifice by Applying Dynamic Contact Angle Model
title_sort numerical study of formation of a series of bubbles from an orifice by applying dynamic contact angle model
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
issn 1687-8442
publishDate 2020-01-01
description The dynamic contact angle model is applied in the formation process of a series of bubbles from Period-I regime to Period-II regime by using the VOF method on a 2D axisymmetric domain. In the first process of the current research, the dynamic contact angle model is validated by comparing the numerical results to the experimental data. Good agreement in terms of bubble shape and bubble detachment time is observed from a lower flow rate Q = 150.8 cm3/min (Re = 54.77, Period-I regime) to a higher flow rate Q = 603.2 cm3/min (Re = 219.07, Period-III regime). The comparison between the dynamic contact angle model and the static contact angle model is also performed. It is observed that the static contact angle model can obtain similar results as the dynamic contact angle model only for smaller gas flow rates (Q ≤ 150.8 cm3/min and Re ≤ 54.77)). For higher gas flow rates, the static contact angle model cannot produce good results as the dynamic contact angle model and has larger relative errors in terms of bubble detachment time and bubble shape.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5213234
work_keys_str_mv AT nanchen numericalstudyofformationofaseriesofbubblesfromanorificebyapplyingdynamiccontactanglemodel
AT xiyuchen numericalstudyofformationofaseriesofbubblesfromanorificebyapplyingdynamiccontactanglemodel
AT antoniodelgado numericalstudyofformationofaseriesofbubblesfromanorificebyapplyingdynamiccontactanglemodel
_version_ 1715044933801345024