Assessment of Mathematical Modeling
Modeling is now being given prominence as one of the six high school subject areas in the Standards for Mathematical Content in the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSM). The CCSSM document suggests that mathematical modeling should not be taught as an isolated topic but instead should...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Columbia University Libraries
2012-05-01
|
Series: | Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College |
Online Access: | https://journals-test.library.columbia.edu/index.php/jmetc/article/view/736 |
id |
doaj-aef032cb98874fa9b48a0370e93754cd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-aef032cb98874fa9b48a0370e93754cd2020-11-25T03:55:16ZengColumbia University LibrariesJournal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College2156-14002156-13972012-05-0131Assessment of Mathematical ModelingRonny Kwan Eu Leong0Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaModeling is now being given prominence as one of the six high school subject areas in the Standards for Mathematical Content in the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSM). The CCSSM document suggests that mathematical modeling should not be taught as an isolated topic but instead should be employed along with other topics. The essence of a modeling problem is constructing a mathematical model for the situation at hand. Assessing mathematical modeling is a new field that requires more study. Developing more tools and ideas to assess modeling tasks is essential and beneficial for mathematics teachers. Rubrics that assess the modeling process are a good beginning in finding suitable methods of assessing mathematical modeling. This article provides two methods for assessing modeling tasks. The first is a scoring rubric that is based on the process of CCSSM’s modeling cycle while the second instrument intends to assess the affective domain of mathematical modeling.https://journals-test.library.columbia.edu/index.php/jmetc/article/view/736 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ronny Kwan Eu Leong |
spellingShingle |
Ronny Kwan Eu Leong Assessment of Mathematical Modeling Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College |
author_facet |
Ronny Kwan Eu Leong |
author_sort |
Ronny Kwan Eu Leong |
title |
Assessment of Mathematical Modeling |
title_short |
Assessment of Mathematical Modeling |
title_full |
Assessment of Mathematical Modeling |
title_fullStr |
Assessment of Mathematical Modeling |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessment of Mathematical Modeling |
title_sort |
assessment of mathematical modeling |
publisher |
Columbia University Libraries |
series |
Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College |
issn |
2156-1400 2156-1397 |
publishDate |
2012-05-01 |
description |
Modeling is now being given prominence as one of the six high school subject areas in the Standards for Mathematical Content in the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSM). The CCSSM document suggests that mathematical modeling should not be taught as an isolated topic but instead should be employed along with other topics. The essence of a modeling problem is constructing a mathematical model for the situation at hand. Assessing mathematical modeling is a new field that requires more study. Developing more tools and ideas to assess modeling tasks is essential and beneficial for mathematics teachers. Rubrics that assess the modeling process are a good beginning in finding suitable methods of assessing mathematical modeling. This article provides two methods for assessing modeling tasks. The first is a scoring rubric that is based on the process of CCSSM’s modeling cycle while the second instrument intends to assess the affective domain of mathematical modeling. |
url |
https://journals-test.library.columbia.edu/index.php/jmetc/article/view/736 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ronnykwaneuleong assessmentofmathematicalmodeling |
_version_ |
1724469718619783168 |