Evaluation of decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean section: A 1-year prospective audit in a tertiary care hospital
Background and Aims: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) committee on professional standards and the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines suggest that decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) and emergency cesarean section (CS) should not be more than 30...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2017-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.joacp.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9185;year=2017;volume=33;issue=1;spage=64;epage=70;aulast=Gupta |
id |
doaj-aee3de061ff24c42a6e91084074dc9f0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-aee3de061ff24c42a6e91084074dc9f02020-11-24T21:38:08ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology0970-91852017-01-01331647010.4103/0970-9185.202197Evaluation of decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean section: A 1-year prospective audit in a tertiary care hospitalSunanda GuptaUdita NaithaniC MadhanmohanAjay SinghPradeep ReddyApoorva GuptaBackground and Aims: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) committee on professional standards and the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines suggest that decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) and emergency cesarean section (CS) should not be more than 30 min, and a delay of more than75 min in the presence of maternal or fetal compromise can lead to poor outcome. This prospective 1-year study was conducted on emergency CS in a tertiary care hospital to evaluate the DDI, factors affecting it and to analyze their effects on maternal and neonatal outcome. Material and Methods: A structured proforma was used to analyze the data from all women undergoing emergency CS, during a 1-year period, included in Category 1 and 2 of NICE guidelines for CS. Results: A total of 453 emergency CSs were evaluated, with a mean DDI of 36.3 ± 17.2 min for Category 1 CS and 38.1 ± 17.7 min for Category 2 CS (P > 0.05). Only 42.4% emergency CSs confirmed to the 30 min DDI while 57.6% had a DDI of more than 30 min. Reasons of delay were identified as a delay in shifting the patient to operation theater (22.1%), anesthesia factors (18.1%), and lack of resources or manpower (16.1%). Maternal complications occurred in 15 (3.3%) patients with 3 (0.7%) nonsurvivors having a DDI of 91.0 ± 97.0 min as compared to survivors with a DDI of 36.8 ± 15.7 min, P = 0.001. There was no significant association between DDI and occurrence of neonatal complications. Conclusion: Failure to meet the current recommendations was associated with adverse maternal outcomes, but not with adverse neonatal outcome.http://www.joacp.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9185;year=2017;volume=33;issue=1;spage=64;epage=70;aulast=GuptaDecision-to-delivery intervaldecision-to-delivery intervalemergency cesarean sectionmaternal outcomeneonatal outcome |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sunanda Gupta Udita Naithani C Madhanmohan Ajay Singh Pradeep Reddy Apoorva Gupta |
spellingShingle |
Sunanda Gupta Udita Naithani C Madhanmohan Ajay Singh Pradeep Reddy Apoorva Gupta Evaluation of decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean section: A 1-year prospective audit in a tertiary care hospital Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology Decision-to-delivery interval decision-to-delivery interval emergency cesarean section maternal outcome neonatal outcome |
author_facet |
Sunanda Gupta Udita Naithani C Madhanmohan Ajay Singh Pradeep Reddy Apoorva Gupta |
author_sort |
Sunanda Gupta |
title |
Evaluation of decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean section: A 1-year prospective audit in a tertiary care hospital |
title_short |
Evaluation of decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean section: A 1-year prospective audit in a tertiary care hospital |
title_full |
Evaluation of decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean section: A 1-year prospective audit in a tertiary care hospital |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean section: A 1-year prospective audit in a tertiary care hospital |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean section: A 1-year prospective audit in a tertiary care hospital |
title_sort |
evaluation of decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean section: a 1-year prospective audit in a tertiary care hospital |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology |
issn |
0970-9185 |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
Background and Aims: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) committee on professional standards and the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines suggest that decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) and emergency cesarean section (CS) should not be more than 30 min, and a delay of more than75 min in the presence of maternal or fetal compromise can lead to poor outcome. This prospective 1-year study was conducted on emergency CS in a tertiary care hospital to evaluate the DDI, factors affecting it and to analyze their effects on maternal and neonatal outcome.
Material and Methods: A structured proforma was used to analyze the data from all women undergoing emergency CS, during a 1-year period, included in Category 1 and 2 of NICE guidelines for CS.
Results: A total of 453 emergency CSs were evaluated, with a mean DDI of 36.3 ± 17.2 min for Category 1 CS and 38.1 ± 17.7 min for Category 2 CS (P > 0.05). Only 42.4% emergency CSs confirmed to the 30 min DDI while 57.6% had a DDI of more than 30 min. Reasons of delay were identified as a delay in shifting the patient to operation theater (22.1%), anesthesia factors (18.1%), and lack of resources or manpower (16.1%). Maternal complications occurred in 15 (3.3%) patients with 3 (0.7%) nonsurvivors having a DDI of 91.0 ± 97.0 min as compared to survivors with a DDI of 36.8 ± 15.7 min, P = 0.001. There was no significant association between DDI and occurrence of neonatal complications.
Conclusion: Failure to meet the current recommendations was associated with adverse maternal outcomes, but not with adverse neonatal outcome. |
topic |
Decision-to-delivery interval decision-to-delivery interval emergency cesarean section maternal outcome neonatal outcome |
url |
http://www.joacp.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9185;year=2017;volume=33;issue=1;spage=64;epage=70;aulast=Gupta |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sunandagupta evaluationofdecisiontodeliveryintervalinemergencycesareansectiona1yearprospectiveauditinatertiarycarehospital AT uditanaithani evaluationofdecisiontodeliveryintervalinemergencycesareansectiona1yearprospectiveauditinatertiarycarehospital AT cmadhanmohan evaluationofdecisiontodeliveryintervalinemergencycesareansectiona1yearprospectiveauditinatertiarycarehospital AT ajaysingh evaluationofdecisiontodeliveryintervalinemergencycesareansectiona1yearprospectiveauditinatertiarycarehospital AT pradeepreddy evaluationofdecisiontodeliveryintervalinemergencycesareansectiona1yearprospectiveauditinatertiarycarehospital AT apoorvagupta evaluationofdecisiontodeliveryintervalinemergencycesareansectiona1yearprospectiveauditinatertiarycarehospital |
_version_ |
1725935429535924224 |