The Problem of Evaluation in the Rhetorical Criticism
The field of the communication sciences is a hybrid field with various influences that can be observed in the research methods that are used: the quantitative-scientific and qualitative-interpretive methods. Rhetorical criticism as a qualitative research in the field of communication calls for its o...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Editura Politehnica
2020-10-01
|
| Series: | Scientific Bulletin of the Politehnica University of Timişoara: Transactions on Modern Languages |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://sc.upt.ro/attachments/article/408/02_Baias.pdf |
| Summary: | The field of the communication sciences is a hybrid field with various influences that can be observed in the research methods that are used: the quantitative-scientific and qualitative-interpretive methods. Rhetorical criticism as a qualitative research in the field of communication calls for its own evaluation standards. Our aim is to clarify, through a meta-analysis, the evaluation criteria proposed by different authors and the standards, after which an essay of the rhetorical criticism can be appreciated. We claim that a work of the rhetorical criticism is not just an exercise of creativity and originality, but rather a way of persuasive argumentation. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1583-7467 1583-7467 |