The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery

Biological samples are vulnerable to degradation from the time they are collected until they are analysed at the laboratory. Biological contaminants, such as bacteria, fungi, and enzymes, as well as environmental factors, such as sunlight, heat, and humidity, can increase the rate of DNA degradation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alex M. Garvin, Ralf Holzinger, Florian Berner, Walter Krebs, Bernhard Hostettler, Elges Lardi, Christian Hertli, Roy Quartermaine, Christoph Stamm
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2013-01-01
Series:BioMed Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/105797
id doaj-aebbb5af26144775be12678ebc3bc951
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aebbb5af26144775be12678ebc3bc9512020-11-24T21:33:26ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412013-01-01201310.1155/2013/105797105797The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and RecoveryAlex M. Garvin0Ralf Holzinger1Florian Berner2Walter Krebs3Bernhard Hostettler4Elges Lardi5Christian Hertli6Roy Quartermaine7Christoph Stamm8Confarma France SARL, Zone Industrielle Canal d’Alsace, 68490 Hombourg, FranceConfarma France SARL, Zone Industrielle Canal d’Alsace, 68490 Hombourg, FranceInstitute of Chemistry and Biological Chemistry, Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), Einsiedlerstrasse 31, 8820 Wädenswil, SwitzerlandInstitute of Chemistry and Biological Chemistry, Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), Einsiedlerstrasse 31, 8820 Wädenswil, SwitzerlandPrionics AG, Wagistrasse 27a, 8952 Schlieren, SwitzerlandPrionics AG, Wagistrasse 27a, 8952 Schlieren, SwitzerlandPrionics AG, Wagistrasse 27a, 8952 Schlieren, SwitzerlandPrionics AG, Wagistrasse 27a, 8952 Schlieren, SwitzerlandPrionics AG, Wagistrasse 27a, 8952 Schlieren, SwitzerlandBiological samples are vulnerable to degradation from the time they are collected until they are analysed at the laboratory. Biological contaminants, such as bacteria, fungi, and enzymes, as well as environmental factors, such as sunlight, heat, and humidity, can increase the rate of DNA degradation. Currently, DNA samples are normally dried or frozen to limit their degradation prior to their arrival at the laboratory. In this study, the effect of the sample drying rate on DNA preservation was investigated, as well as a comparison between drying and freezing methods. The drying performances of two commercially available DNA collection tools (swab and drying tube) with different drying rates were evaluated. The swabs were used to collect human saliva, placed into the drying tubes, and stored in a controlled environment at 25°C and 60% relative humidity, or frozen at −20°C, for 2 weeks. Swabs that were stored in fast sample drying tubes yielded 95% recoverable DNA, whereas swabs stored in tubes with slower sample drying rates yielded only 12% recoverable DNA; saliva stored in a microtube at −20°C was used as a control. Thus, DNA sampling tools that offer rapid drying can significantly improve the preservation of DNA collected on a swab, increasing the quantity of DNA available for subsequent analysis.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/105797
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alex M. Garvin
Ralf Holzinger
Florian Berner
Walter Krebs
Bernhard Hostettler
Elges Lardi
Christian Hertli
Roy Quartermaine
Christoph Stamm
spellingShingle Alex M. Garvin
Ralf Holzinger
Florian Berner
Walter Krebs
Bernhard Hostettler
Elges Lardi
Christian Hertli
Roy Quartermaine
Christoph Stamm
The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery
BioMed Research International
author_facet Alex M. Garvin
Ralf Holzinger
Florian Berner
Walter Krebs
Bernhard Hostettler
Elges Lardi
Christian Hertli
Roy Quartermaine
Christoph Stamm
author_sort Alex M. Garvin
title The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery
title_short The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery
title_full The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery
title_fullStr The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery
title_full_unstemmed The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery
title_sort forensix evidence collection tube and its impact on dna preservation and recovery
publisher Hindawi Limited
series BioMed Research International
issn 2314-6133
2314-6141
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Biological samples are vulnerable to degradation from the time they are collected until they are analysed at the laboratory. Biological contaminants, such as bacteria, fungi, and enzymes, as well as environmental factors, such as sunlight, heat, and humidity, can increase the rate of DNA degradation. Currently, DNA samples are normally dried or frozen to limit their degradation prior to their arrival at the laboratory. In this study, the effect of the sample drying rate on DNA preservation was investigated, as well as a comparison between drying and freezing methods. The drying performances of two commercially available DNA collection tools (swab and drying tube) with different drying rates were evaluated. The swabs were used to collect human saliva, placed into the drying tubes, and stored in a controlled environment at 25°C and 60% relative humidity, or frozen at −20°C, for 2 weeks. Swabs that were stored in fast sample drying tubes yielded 95% recoverable DNA, whereas swabs stored in tubes with slower sample drying rates yielded only 12% recoverable DNA; saliva stored in a microtube at −20°C was used as a control. Thus, DNA sampling tools that offer rapid drying can significantly improve the preservation of DNA collected on a swab, increasing the quantity of DNA available for subsequent analysis.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/105797
work_keys_str_mv AT alexmgarvin theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT ralfholzinger theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT florianberner theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT walterkrebs theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT bernhardhostettler theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT elgeslardi theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT christianhertli theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT royquartermaine theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT christophstamm theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT alexmgarvin forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT ralfholzinger forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT florianberner forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT walterkrebs forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT bernhardhostettler forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT elgeslardi forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT christianhertli forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT royquartermaine forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT christophstamm forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
_version_ 1725953197787316224