The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery
Biological samples are vulnerable to degradation from the time they are collected until they are analysed at the laboratory. Biological contaminants, such as bacteria, fungi, and enzymes, as well as environmental factors, such as sunlight, heat, and humidity, can increase the rate of DNA degradation...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2013-01-01
|
Series: | BioMed Research International |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/105797 |
id |
doaj-aebbb5af26144775be12678ebc3bc951 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-aebbb5af26144775be12678ebc3bc9512020-11-24T21:33:26ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412013-01-01201310.1155/2013/105797105797The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and RecoveryAlex M. Garvin0Ralf Holzinger1Florian Berner2Walter Krebs3Bernhard Hostettler4Elges Lardi5Christian Hertli6Roy Quartermaine7Christoph Stamm8Confarma France SARL, Zone Industrielle Canal d’Alsace, 68490 Hombourg, FranceConfarma France SARL, Zone Industrielle Canal d’Alsace, 68490 Hombourg, FranceInstitute of Chemistry and Biological Chemistry, Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), Einsiedlerstrasse 31, 8820 Wädenswil, SwitzerlandInstitute of Chemistry and Biological Chemistry, Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), Einsiedlerstrasse 31, 8820 Wädenswil, SwitzerlandPrionics AG, Wagistrasse 27a, 8952 Schlieren, SwitzerlandPrionics AG, Wagistrasse 27a, 8952 Schlieren, SwitzerlandPrionics AG, Wagistrasse 27a, 8952 Schlieren, SwitzerlandPrionics AG, Wagistrasse 27a, 8952 Schlieren, SwitzerlandPrionics AG, Wagistrasse 27a, 8952 Schlieren, SwitzerlandBiological samples are vulnerable to degradation from the time they are collected until they are analysed at the laboratory. Biological contaminants, such as bacteria, fungi, and enzymes, as well as environmental factors, such as sunlight, heat, and humidity, can increase the rate of DNA degradation. Currently, DNA samples are normally dried or frozen to limit their degradation prior to their arrival at the laboratory. In this study, the effect of the sample drying rate on DNA preservation was investigated, as well as a comparison between drying and freezing methods. The drying performances of two commercially available DNA collection tools (swab and drying tube) with different drying rates were evaluated. The swabs were used to collect human saliva, placed into the drying tubes, and stored in a controlled environment at 25°C and 60% relative humidity, or frozen at −20°C, for 2 weeks. Swabs that were stored in fast sample drying tubes yielded 95% recoverable DNA, whereas swabs stored in tubes with slower sample drying rates yielded only 12% recoverable DNA; saliva stored in a microtube at −20°C was used as a control. Thus, DNA sampling tools that offer rapid drying can significantly improve the preservation of DNA collected on a swab, increasing the quantity of DNA available for subsequent analysis.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/105797 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Alex M. Garvin Ralf Holzinger Florian Berner Walter Krebs Bernhard Hostettler Elges Lardi Christian Hertli Roy Quartermaine Christoph Stamm |
spellingShingle |
Alex M. Garvin Ralf Holzinger Florian Berner Walter Krebs Bernhard Hostettler Elges Lardi Christian Hertli Roy Quartermaine Christoph Stamm The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery BioMed Research International |
author_facet |
Alex M. Garvin Ralf Holzinger Florian Berner Walter Krebs Bernhard Hostettler Elges Lardi Christian Hertli Roy Quartermaine Christoph Stamm |
author_sort |
Alex M. Garvin |
title |
The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery |
title_short |
The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery |
title_full |
The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery |
title_fullStr |
The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery |
title_full_unstemmed |
The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery |
title_sort |
forensix evidence collection tube and its impact on dna preservation and recovery |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
BioMed Research International |
issn |
2314-6133 2314-6141 |
publishDate |
2013-01-01 |
description |
Biological samples are vulnerable to degradation from the time they are collected until they are analysed at the laboratory. Biological contaminants, such as bacteria, fungi, and enzymes, as well as environmental factors, such as sunlight, heat, and humidity, can increase the rate of DNA degradation. Currently, DNA samples are normally dried or frozen to limit their degradation prior to their arrival at the laboratory. In this study, the effect of the sample drying rate on DNA preservation was investigated, as well as a comparison between drying and freezing methods. The drying performances of two commercially available DNA collection tools (swab and drying tube) with different drying rates were evaluated. The swabs were used to collect human saliva, placed into the drying tubes, and stored in a controlled environment at 25°C and 60% relative humidity, or frozen at −20°C, for 2 weeks. Swabs that were stored in fast sample drying tubes yielded 95% recoverable DNA, whereas swabs stored in tubes with slower sample drying rates yielded only 12% recoverable DNA; saliva stored in a microtube at −20°C was used as a control. Thus, DNA sampling tools that offer rapid drying can significantly improve the preservation of DNA collected on a swab, increasing the quantity of DNA available for subsequent analysis. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/105797 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alexmgarvin theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT ralfholzinger theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT florianberner theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT walterkrebs theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT bernhardhostettler theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT elgeslardi theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT christianhertli theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT royquartermaine theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT christophstamm theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT alexmgarvin forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT ralfholzinger forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT florianberner forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT walterkrebs forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT bernhardhostettler forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT elgeslardi forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT christianhertli forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT royquartermaine forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT christophstamm forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery |
_version_ |
1725953197787316224 |