Green or gold? Open access after Finch
The Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings reported to the UK's Minister of Universities and Science in mid-2012. This was followed by a new policy for open access (OA) publishing by Research Councils UK (RCUK) as well as a commitment from the Higher Education Funding...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ubiquity Press
2012-11-01
|
Series: | Insights: The UKSG Journal |
Online Access: | http://insights.uksg.org/articles/20 |
id |
doaj-ae94dbf6891246cd94af94ef2bdcf8d7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ae94dbf6891246cd94af94ef2bdcf8d72020-11-25T00:10:45ZengUbiquity PressInsights: The UKSG Journal 2048-77542012-11-0125323524010.1629/2048-7754.25.3.23516Green or gold? Open access after FinchMartin HallThe Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings reported to the UK's Minister of Universities and Science in mid-2012. This was followed by a new policy for open access (OA) publishing by Research Councils UK (RCUK) as well as a commitment from the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) to require that research submitted to future research evaluation exercises – after the 2014 Research Excellence Framework (REF) – be open access. These initiatives build on a broad consensus, that includes for-profit publishers, that open access is the way of the future. Here, I give a perspective on these issues, both as the head of an institution with particular interests in the future of scholarly publication and also as a member of the Working Group on Expanding Access. The continuing development of informed debate will be critical for the future of the scholarly publishing system.http://insights.uksg.org/articles/20 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Martin Hall |
spellingShingle |
Martin Hall Green or gold? Open access after Finch Insights: The UKSG Journal |
author_facet |
Martin Hall |
author_sort |
Martin Hall |
title |
Green or gold? Open access after Finch |
title_short |
Green or gold? Open access after Finch |
title_full |
Green or gold? Open access after Finch |
title_fullStr |
Green or gold? Open access after Finch |
title_full_unstemmed |
Green or gold? Open access after Finch |
title_sort |
green or gold? open access after finch |
publisher |
Ubiquity Press |
series |
Insights: The UKSG Journal |
issn |
2048-7754 |
publishDate |
2012-11-01 |
description |
The Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings reported to the UK's Minister of Universities and Science in mid-2012. This was followed by a new policy for open access (OA) publishing by Research Councils UK (RCUK) as well as a commitment from the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) to require that research submitted to future research evaluation exercises – after the 2014 Research Excellence Framework (REF) – be open access. These initiatives build on a broad consensus, that includes for-profit publishers, that open access is the way of the future. Here, I give a perspective on these issues, both as the head of an institution with particular interests in the future of scholarly publication and also as a member of the Working Group on Expanding Access. The continuing development of informed debate will be critical for the future of the scholarly publishing system. |
url |
http://insights.uksg.org/articles/20 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT martinhall greenorgoldopenaccessafterfinch |
_version_ |
1725407296889028608 |