Naturalistic acquisition in an early language classroom

This study investigated whether it is possible to provide naturalistic second language acquisition (SLA) of vocabulary for young learners in a classroom situation without resorting to a classical immersion approach. Participants were 60 first-grade pupils in Norwegian two elementary schools in their...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne eDahl, Mila Dimitrova Vulchanova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00329/full
id doaj-ae8b5b4e40364a20b23e75273bc6bd0e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ae8b5b4e40364a20b23e75273bc6bd0e2020-11-24T23:58:53ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782014-04-01510.3389/fpsyg.2014.0032979025Naturalistic acquisition in an early language classroomAnne eDahl0Mila Dimitrova Vulchanova1NTNU Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyNTNU Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyThis study investigated whether it is possible to provide naturalistic second language acquisition (SLA) of vocabulary for young learners in a classroom situation without resorting to a classical immersion approach. Participants were 60 first-grade pupils in Norwegian two elementary schools in their first year. The control group followed regular instruction as prescribed by the school curriculum, while the experimental group received increased naturalistic target language input. This entailed extensive use of English by the teacher during English classes, and also during morning meetings and for simple instructions and classroom management throughout the day. Our hypothesis was that it is possible to facilitate naturalistic acquisition through better quality target language exposure within a normal curriculum. The students' English vocabulary knowledge was measured using the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, version 4 (PPVT-IV, Dunn & Dunn, 2007), at the beginning and the end of the first year of school. Findings are that 1) early-start second-language (L2) programs in school do not in themselves guarantee vocabulary development in the first year, 2) a focus on increased exposure to the L2 can lead to a significant increase in receptive vocabulary comprehension in the course of only eight months, and 3) even with relatively modest input, learners in such an early-start L2 program can display vocabulary acquisition comparable in some respects to that of younger native children matched on vocabulary size. The overall conclusion is that naturalistic vocabulary acquisition is in fact possible in a classroom setting.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00329/fullSecond Language Acquisitioninputnaturalistic acquisitionearly-startclassroom.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anne eDahl
Mila Dimitrova Vulchanova
spellingShingle Anne eDahl
Mila Dimitrova Vulchanova
Naturalistic acquisition in an early language classroom
Frontiers in Psychology
Second Language Acquisition
input
naturalistic acquisition
early-start
classroom.
author_facet Anne eDahl
Mila Dimitrova Vulchanova
author_sort Anne eDahl
title Naturalistic acquisition in an early language classroom
title_short Naturalistic acquisition in an early language classroom
title_full Naturalistic acquisition in an early language classroom
title_fullStr Naturalistic acquisition in an early language classroom
title_full_unstemmed Naturalistic acquisition in an early language classroom
title_sort naturalistic acquisition in an early language classroom
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2014-04-01
description This study investigated whether it is possible to provide naturalistic second language acquisition (SLA) of vocabulary for young learners in a classroom situation without resorting to a classical immersion approach. Participants were 60 first-grade pupils in Norwegian two elementary schools in their first year. The control group followed regular instruction as prescribed by the school curriculum, while the experimental group received increased naturalistic target language input. This entailed extensive use of English by the teacher during English classes, and also during morning meetings and for simple instructions and classroom management throughout the day. Our hypothesis was that it is possible to facilitate naturalistic acquisition through better quality target language exposure within a normal curriculum. The students' English vocabulary knowledge was measured using the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, version 4 (PPVT-IV, Dunn & Dunn, 2007), at the beginning and the end of the first year of school. Findings are that 1) early-start second-language (L2) programs in school do not in themselves guarantee vocabulary development in the first year, 2) a focus on increased exposure to the L2 can lead to a significant increase in receptive vocabulary comprehension in the course of only eight months, and 3) even with relatively modest input, learners in such an early-start L2 program can display vocabulary acquisition comparable in some respects to that of younger native children matched on vocabulary size. The overall conclusion is that naturalistic vocabulary acquisition is in fact possible in a classroom setting.
topic Second Language Acquisition
input
naturalistic acquisition
early-start
classroom.
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00329/full
work_keys_str_mv AT anneedahl naturalisticacquisitioninanearlylanguageclassroom
AT miladimitrovavulchanova naturalisticacquisitioninanearlylanguageclassroom
_version_ 1725449213331898368