Metacommunication in the judiciary field: formulations. A proposal for cataloging and an approach to facework in institutional contexts

This work is in the line of Conversation Analysis concerning institutional types of asymmetrical situations (Drew & Heritage, 1992; Orletti, 2000) and, particularly, judicial oral interactions (Mariottini, 2013a, 2013b). The aim is to investigate the uses and the interactional and social functio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Laura Mariottini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: ASICE - Asociación Internacional para los Estudios de la Comunicación en Español 2015-12-01
Series:Textos en Proceso
Subjects:
Online Access:http://oa.edice.org/index.php/tep/article/view/13
id doaj-ae72da92119a46358f07e4f6efb0c8c1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ae72da92119a46358f07e4f6efb0c8c12020-11-25T00:33:02ZengASICE - Asociación Internacional para los Estudios de la Comunicación en EspañolTextos en Proceso2001-967X2015-12-0111718910.17710/tep.2015.1.1.4mar8Metacommunication in the judiciary field: formulations. A proposal for cataloging and an approach to facework in institutional contextsLaura Mariottini0Università di Roma La SapienzaThis work is in the line of Conversation Analysis concerning institutional types of asymmetrical situations (Drew & Heritage, 1992; Orletti, 2000) and, particularly, judicial oral interactions (Mariottini, 2013a, 2013b). The aim is to investigate the uses and the interactional and social functions of the metacommunicative practices here occurring. Data proceed from COrAL – Corpus Oral de Ámbito Legal (Oral Corpus of Legal Context; Mariottini, forthcoming), composed by transcriptions of (video)recordings of oral trials, whose current extension is 22 hours and 53 minutes. The result of the qualitative analysis carried out for this article is to identify different types of formulations and to propose a classification according to interactional and social functions played by each type.http://oa.edice.org/index.php/tep/article/view/13oralityjudicial contextmetacommunicationformulations
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laura Mariottini
spellingShingle Laura Mariottini
Metacommunication in the judiciary field: formulations. A proposal for cataloging and an approach to facework in institutional contexts
Textos en Proceso
orality
judicial context
metacommunication
formulations
author_facet Laura Mariottini
author_sort Laura Mariottini
title Metacommunication in the judiciary field: formulations. A proposal for cataloging and an approach to facework in institutional contexts
title_short Metacommunication in the judiciary field: formulations. A proposal for cataloging and an approach to facework in institutional contexts
title_full Metacommunication in the judiciary field: formulations. A proposal for cataloging and an approach to facework in institutional contexts
title_fullStr Metacommunication in the judiciary field: formulations. A proposal for cataloging and an approach to facework in institutional contexts
title_full_unstemmed Metacommunication in the judiciary field: formulations. A proposal for cataloging and an approach to facework in institutional contexts
title_sort metacommunication in the judiciary field: formulations. a proposal for cataloging and an approach to facework in institutional contexts
publisher ASICE - Asociación Internacional para los Estudios de la Comunicación en Español
series Textos en Proceso
issn 2001-967X
publishDate 2015-12-01
description This work is in the line of Conversation Analysis concerning institutional types of asymmetrical situations (Drew & Heritage, 1992; Orletti, 2000) and, particularly, judicial oral interactions (Mariottini, 2013a, 2013b). The aim is to investigate the uses and the interactional and social functions of the metacommunicative practices here occurring. Data proceed from COrAL – Corpus Oral de Ámbito Legal (Oral Corpus of Legal Context; Mariottini, forthcoming), composed by transcriptions of (video)recordings of oral trials, whose current extension is 22 hours and 53 minutes. The result of the qualitative analysis carried out for this article is to identify different types of formulations and to propose a classification according to interactional and social functions played by each type.
topic orality
judicial context
metacommunication
formulations
url http://oa.edice.org/index.php/tep/article/view/13
work_keys_str_mv AT lauramariottini metacommunicationinthejudiciaryfieldformulationsaproposalforcatalogingandanapproachtofaceworkininstitutionalcontexts
_version_ 1725317686570778624