Metacommunication in the judiciary field: formulations. A proposal for cataloging and an approach to facework in institutional contexts
This work is in the line of Conversation Analysis concerning institutional types of asymmetrical situations (Drew & Heritage, 1992; Orletti, 2000) and, particularly, judicial oral interactions (Mariottini, 2013a, 2013b). The aim is to investigate the uses and the interactional and social functio...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
ASICE - Asociación Internacional para los Estudios de la Comunicación en Español
2015-12-01
|
Series: | Textos en Proceso |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://oa.edice.org/index.php/tep/article/view/13 |
id |
doaj-ae72da92119a46358f07e4f6efb0c8c1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ae72da92119a46358f07e4f6efb0c8c12020-11-25T00:33:02ZengASICE - Asociación Internacional para los Estudios de la Comunicación en EspañolTextos en Proceso2001-967X2015-12-0111718910.17710/tep.2015.1.1.4mar8Metacommunication in the judiciary field: formulations. A proposal for cataloging and an approach to facework in institutional contextsLaura Mariottini0Università di Roma La SapienzaThis work is in the line of Conversation Analysis concerning institutional types of asymmetrical situations (Drew & Heritage, 1992; Orletti, 2000) and, particularly, judicial oral interactions (Mariottini, 2013a, 2013b). The aim is to investigate the uses and the interactional and social functions of the metacommunicative practices here occurring. Data proceed from COrAL – Corpus Oral de Ámbito Legal (Oral Corpus of Legal Context; Mariottini, forthcoming), composed by transcriptions of (video)recordings of oral trials, whose current extension is 22 hours and 53 minutes. The result of the qualitative analysis carried out for this article is to identify different types of formulations and to propose a classification according to interactional and social functions played by each type.http://oa.edice.org/index.php/tep/article/view/13oralityjudicial contextmetacommunicationformulations |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Laura Mariottini |
spellingShingle |
Laura Mariottini Metacommunication in the judiciary field: formulations. A proposal for cataloging and an approach to facework in institutional contexts Textos en Proceso orality judicial context metacommunication formulations |
author_facet |
Laura Mariottini |
author_sort |
Laura Mariottini |
title |
Metacommunication in the judiciary field: formulations. A proposal for cataloging and an approach to facework in institutional contexts |
title_short |
Metacommunication in the judiciary field: formulations. A proposal for cataloging and an approach to facework in institutional contexts |
title_full |
Metacommunication in the judiciary field: formulations. A proposal for cataloging and an approach to facework in institutional contexts |
title_fullStr |
Metacommunication in the judiciary field: formulations. A proposal for cataloging and an approach to facework in institutional contexts |
title_full_unstemmed |
Metacommunication in the judiciary field: formulations. A proposal for cataloging and an approach to facework in institutional contexts |
title_sort |
metacommunication in the judiciary field: formulations. a proposal for cataloging and an approach to facework in institutional contexts |
publisher |
ASICE - Asociación Internacional para los Estudios de la Comunicación en Español |
series |
Textos en Proceso |
issn |
2001-967X |
publishDate |
2015-12-01 |
description |
This work is in the line of Conversation Analysis concerning institutional types of asymmetrical situations (Drew & Heritage, 1992; Orletti, 2000) and, particularly, judicial oral interactions (Mariottini, 2013a, 2013b). The aim is to investigate the uses and the interactional and social functions of the metacommunicative practices here occurring. Data proceed from COrAL – Corpus Oral de Ámbito Legal (Oral Corpus of Legal Context; Mariottini, forthcoming), composed by transcriptions of (video)recordings of oral trials, whose current extension is 22 hours and 53 minutes. The result of the qualitative analysis carried out for this article is to identify different types of formulations and to propose a classification according to interactional and social functions played by each type. |
topic |
orality judicial context metacommunication formulations |
url |
http://oa.edice.org/index.php/tep/article/view/13 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lauramariottini metacommunicationinthejudiciaryfieldformulationsaproposalforcatalogingandanapproachtofaceworkininstitutionalcontexts |
_version_ |
1725317686570778624 |