Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (Swara)
The paper considers major principles of application of the multi‐attribute systems to solve legislative tasks. In order to assess dispute resolution methods from economic, social and other points of view, it is necessary to apply methods for assessing solutions according to multiple attributes. All...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
2010-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Business Economics and Management |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/JBEM/article/view/5851 |
id |
doaj-ae70fe343de24c84947aa86aa8bda89b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ae70fe343de24c84947aa86aa8bda89b2021-07-02T12:34:52ZengVilnius Gediminas Technical UniversityJournal of Business Economics and Management1611-16992029-44332010-06-0111210.3846/jbem.2010.12Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (Swara)Violeta Keršulienė0Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas1Zenonas Turskis2Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, LithuaniaVilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, LithuaniaVilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania The paper considers major principles of application of the multi‐attribute systems to solve legislative tasks. In order to assess dispute resolution methods from economic, social and other points of view, it is necessary to apply methods for assessing solutions according to multiple attributes. All known multi‐attribute methods cannot value the atribute weights as one weight of attribute is higher or lower significant than the other attribute. The new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis method (SWARA) allows including experts, lawyers or dispute parties opinion about significance ratio of the attributes in the process of rational decision determination. SWARA method could be applied in practical implementation of specialised decision support systems and alternative dispute resolution in virtual environment. Starting with principles and established approaches, a problem‐structuring methodology was developed which would condition the problem to allow a more thoughtful application of existing decision‐making analytic methodologies. Santrauka Darbe nagrinejami daugiakriterines analizes taikymo galimybes ir principai teisiniams uždaviniams spresti. Siekiant ekonominiu, socialiniu ar kitu aspektu ivertinti ginču sprendimo būdu alternatyvas, būtina taikyti metodus, ivertinančius šias alternatyvas apibūdinančius kriterijus. Tačiau visi žinomi daugiakriteriniai metodai nevertina, kiek rodikliai, apibūdinantys alternatyvas, yra vienas už kita svar‐besni ar ne tokie reikšmingi. Pasiūlytas naujas kriteriju svoriu nustatymo metodas, pagristas nuose‐kliu laipsnišku poriniu kriteriju santykines svarbos lyginimu (angl. Step‐Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis ‐ SWARA), leidžia priimant sprendimus ivertinti ekspertu, advokatu ar ginčo šaliu nuomo‐ne apie rodikliu reikšmingumu skirtumus. SWARA metodas gali būti taikomas kuriant specializuotas sprendimu paramos sistemas, skirtas racionaliam ginču sprendimo būdui parinkti ar ginčams spresti alternatyviais būdais virtualioje aplinkoje. Darbe trumpai apžvelgti ginču sprendimo būdai, sukurtas ju vertinimo ir lyginimo metodas, kuris sekmingai galetu būti taikomas ir kitiems uždaviniams spresti. First Published Online: 09 Jun 2011 Reikšminiai žodžiai: SWARA, ginču sprendimas, sprendimupriemimas, rodikliu vertinimas https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/JBEM/article/view/5851SWARAdispute resolutiondecision-makingratio analysis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Violeta Keršulienė Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas Zenonas Turskis |
spellingShingle |
Violeta Keršulienė Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas Zenonas Turskis Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (Swara) Journal of Business Economics and Management SWARA dispute resolution decision-making ratio analysis |
author_facet |
Violeta Keršulienė Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas Zenonas Turskis |
author_sort |
Violeta Keršulienė |
title |
Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (Swara) |
title_short |
Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (Swara) |
title_full |
Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (Swara) |
title_fullStr |
Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (Swara) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (Swara) |
title_sort |
selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (swara) |
publisher |
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University |
series |
Journal of Business Economics and Management |
issn |
1611-1699 2029-4433 |
publishDate |
2010-06-01 |
description |
The paper considers major principles of application of the multi‐attribute systems to solve legislative tasks. In order to assess dispute resolution methods from economic, social and other points of view, it is necessary to apply methods for assessing solutions according to multiple attributes. All known multi‐attribute methods cannot value the atribute weights as one weight of attribute is higher or lower significant than the other attribute. The new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis method (SWARA) allows including experts, lawyers or dispute parties opinion about significance ratio of the attributes in the process of rational decision determination. SWARA method could be applied in practical implementation of specialised decision support systems and alternative dispute resolution in virtual environment. Starting with principles and established approaches, a problem‐structuring methodology was developed which would condition the problem to allow a more thoughtful application of existing decision‐making analytic methodologies.
Santrauka
Darbe nagrinejami daugiakriterines analizes taikymo galimybes ir principai teisiniams uždaviniams spresti. Siekiant ekonominiu, socialiniu ar kitu aspektu ivertinti ginču sprendimo būdu alternatyvas, būtina taikyti metodus, ivertinančius šias alternatyvas apibūdinančius kriterijus. Tačiau visi žinomi daugiakriteriniai metodai nevertina, kiek rodikliai, apibūdinantys alternatyvas, yra vienas už kita svar‐besni ar ne tokie reikšmingi. Pasiūlytas naujas kriteriju svoriu nustatymo metodas, pagristas nuose‐kliu laipsnišku poriniu kriteriju santykines svarbos lyginimu (angl. Step‐Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis ‐ SWARA), leidžia priimant sprendimus ivertinti ekspertu, advokatu ar ginčo šaliu nuomo‐ne apie rodikliu reikšmingumu skirtumus. SWARA metodas gali būti taikomas kuriant specializuotas sprendimu paramos sistemas, skirtas racionaliam ginču sprendimo būdui parinkti ar ginčams spresti alternatyviais būdais virtualioje aplinkoje. Darbe trumpai apžvelgti ginču sprendimo būdai, sukurtas ju vertinimo ir lyginimo metodas, kuris sekmingai galetu būti taikomas ir kitiems uždaviniams spresti.
First Published Online: 09 Jun 2011
Reikšminiai žodžiai: SWARA, ginču sprendimas, sprendimupriemimas, rodikliu vertinimas
|
topic |
SWARA dispute resolution decision-making ratio analysis |
url |
https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/JBEM/article/view/5851 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT violetakersuliene selectionofrationaldisputeresolutionmethodbyapplyingnewstepwiseweightassessmentratioanalysisswara AT edmundaskazimieraszavadskas selectionofrationaldisputeresolutionmethodbyapplyingnewstepwiseweightassessmentratioanalysisswara AT zenonasturskis selectionofrationaldisputeresolutionmethodbyapplyingnewstepwiseweightassessmentratioanalysisswara |
_version_ |
1721330066724487168 |