EVALUATION OF THE EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLING AND PRESERVING METHODS FOR NON-INVASIVE SAMPLES WHEN BROWN BEAR POPULATION-GENETIC STUDIES ARE CONDUCTING

<p align="left">The possibilities of using non-invasively sampled biological material to study the genetic diversity and status of the brown bear population in the European North of Russia are discussed. The effectiveness of sampling and preservation methods is evaluated. Fieldwork i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anastasiia Kuznetsova, Konstantin Tirronen, Danila Panchenko, Julia Schregel, Evgeny Khizhkin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences 2019-06-01
Series:Transactions of the Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.krc.karelia.ru/index.php/biology/article/view/1038
id doaj-ae59a222b1b54a41a5ad9f1536a5a105
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ae59a222b1b54a41a5ad9f1536a5a1052020-11-25T03:34:55ZengKarelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of SciencesTransactions of the Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences1997-32172312-45042019-06-01610.17076/eb1038752EVALUATION OF THE EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLING AND PRESERVING METHODS FOR NON-INVASIVE SAMPLES WHEN BROWN BEAR POPULATION-GENETIC STUDIES ARE CONDUCTINGAnastasiia Kuznetsova0Konstantin Tirronen1Danila Panchenko2Julia Schregel3Evgeny Khizhkin4Institute of Biology, Karelian Research Centre, Russian Academy of SciencesInstitute of Biology, Karelian Research Centre, Russian Academy of SciencesInstitute of Biology, Karelian Research Centre, Russian Academy of SciencesNorwegian Institute for Bioeconomy, SvanhovdInstitute of Biology, Karelian Research Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences Petrozavodsk State University<p align="left">The possibilities of using non-invasively sampled biological material to study the genetic diversity and status of the brown bear population in the European North of Russia are discussed. The effectiveness of sampling and preservation methods is evaluated. Fieldwork including non-invasive collection of biological material was carried out in the study area in spring, summer and autumn 2014–2016. The studied area covers the southeast of the Murmansk Region and the Republic of Karelia. 393 samples of bear feces were collected. We conducted DNA extraction from samples and genotyping with 8 microsatellite markers in the DNA laboratory of the NIBIO Svanhovd Research Station (Svanvik, Norway). 48 brown bear individuals were successfully identified. The influence of several factors (the preservation method, age of the collected sample, diet content and sun exposure) on the amplification success was studied. When we analyzed all factors together, only diet content had a significant effect on the amplification success (p &lt;0.05). The presence of berries in feces was found to have a positive effect on DNA and increased the effectiveness of genotyping. The analysis of each factor independently showed that both the ‘freshness’ of the sample and the method of its preservation significantly influenced the result of genotyping. Fresh feces and samples preserved in STOOL solution were the most suitable for genetic analysis. According to these results, recommendations for using noninvasively sampled biomaterial in population genetic studies are given.</p>http://journals.krc.karelia.ru/index.php/biology/article/view/1038brown bearursus arctos l.fecesnon-invasive samplingmethodpreservationdietdna extractionstr analysis.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anastasiia Kuznetsova
Konstantin Tirronen
Danila Panchenko
Julia Schregel
Evgeny Khizhkin
spellingShingle Anastasiia Kuznetsova
Konstantin Tirronen
Danila Panchenko
Julia Schregel
Evgeny Khizhkin
EVALUATION OF THE EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLING AND PRESERVING METHODS FOR NON-INVASIVE SAMPLES WHEN BROWN BEAR POPULATION-GENETIC STUDIES ARE CONDUCTING
Transactions of the Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences
brown bear
ursus arctos l.
feces
non-invasive sampling
method
preservation
diet
dna extraction
str analysis.
author_facet Anastasiia Kuznetsova
Konstantin Tirronen
Danila Panchenko
Julia Schregel
Evgeny Khizhkin
author_sort Anastasiia Kuznetsova
title EVALUATION OF THE EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLING AND PRESERVING METHODS FOR NON-INVASIVE SAMPLES WHEN BROWN BEAR POPULATION-GENETIC STUDIES ARE CONDUCTING
title_short EVALUATION OF THE EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLING AND PRESERVING METHODS FOR NON-INVASIVE SAMPLES WHEN BROWN BEAR POPULATION-GENETIC STUDIES ARE CONDUCTING
title_full EVALUATION OF THE EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLING AND PRESERVING METHODS FOR NON-INVASIVE SAMPLES WHEN BROWN BEAR POPULATION-GENETIC STUDIES ARE CONDUCTING
title_fullStr EVALUATION OF THE EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLING AND PRESERVING METHODS FOR NON-INVASIVE SAMPLES WHEN BROWN BEAR POPULATION-GENETIC STUDIES ARE CONDUCTING
title_full_unstemmed EVALUATION OF THE EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLING AND PRESERVING METHODS FOR NON-INVASIVE SAMPLES WHEN BROWN BEAR POPULATION-GENETIC STUDIES ARE CONDUCTING
title_sort evaluation of the efficiency of sampling and preserving methods for non-invasive samples when brown bear population-genetic studies are conducting
publisher Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences
series Transactions of the Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences
issn 1997-3217
2312-4504
publishDate 2019-06-01
description <p align="left">The possibilities of using non-invasively sampled biological material to study the genetic diversity and status of the brown bear population in the European North of Russia are discussed. The effectiveness of sampling and preservation methods is evaluated. Fieldwork including non-invasive collection of biological material was carried out in the study area in spring, summer and autumn 2014–2016. The studied area covers the southeast of the Murmansk Region and the Republic of Karelia. 393 samples of bear feces were collected. We conducted DNA extraction from samples and genotyping with 8 microsatellite markers in the DNA laboratory of the NIBIO Svanhovd Research Station (Svanvik, Norway). 48 brown bear individuals were successfully identified. The influence of several factors (the preservation method, age of the collected sample, diet content and sun exposure) on the amplification success was studied. When we analyzed all factors together, only diet content had a significant effect on the amplification success (p &lt;0.05). The presence of berries in feces was found to have a positive effect on DNA and increased the effectiveness of genotyping. The analysis of each factor independently showed that both the ‘freshness’ of the sample and the method of its preservation significantly influenced the result of genotyping. Fresh feces and samples preserved in STOOL solution were the most suitable for genetic analysis. According to these results, recommendations for using noninvasively sampled biomaterial in population genetic studies are given.</p>
topic brown bear
ursus arctos l.
feces
non-invasive sampling
method
preservation
diet
dna extraction
str analysis.
url http://journals.krc.karelia.ru/index.php/biology/article/view/1038
work_keys_str_mv AT anastasiiakuznetsova evaluationoftheefficiencyofsamplingandpreservingmethodsfornoninvasivesampleswhenbrownbearpopulationgeneticstudiesareconducting
AT konstantintirronen evaluationoftheefficiencyofsamplingandpreservingmethodsfornoninvasivesampleswhenbrownbearpopulationgeneticstudiesareconducting
AT danilapanchenko evaluationoftheefficiencyofsamplingandpreservingmethodsfornoninvasivesampleswhenbrownbearpopulationgeneticstudiesareconducting
AT juliaschregel evaluationoftheefficiencyofsamplingandpreservingmethodsfornoninvasivesampleswhenbrownbearpopulationgeneticstudiesareconducting
AT evgenykhizhkin evaluationoftheefficiencyofsamplingandpreservingmethodsfornoninvasivesampleswhenbrownbearpopulationgeneticstudiesareconducting
_version_ 1724556692467744768