Positive geometry in the diagonal limit of the conformal bootstrap

Abstract We consider the diagonal limit of the conformal bootstrap in arbitrary dimensions and investigate the question if physical theories are given in terms of cyclic polytopes. Recently, it has been pointed out that in d = 1, the geometric understanding of the boot- strap equations for unitary t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kallol Sen, Aninda Sinha, Ahmadullah Zahed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2019-11-01
Series:Journal of High Energy Physics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP11(2019)059
id doaj-ae55cb1bfb504df1a37b7f67a7149a1a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ae55cb1bfb504df1a37b7f67a7149a1a2020-11-25T04:09:12ZengSpringerOpenJournal of High Energy Physics1029-84792019-11-0120191113210.1007/JHEP11(2019)059Positive geometry in the diagonal limit of the conformal bootstrapKallol Sen0Aninda Sinha1Ahmadullah Zahed2Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (WPI), University of TokyoCentre for High Energy Physics, Indian Institute of ScienceCentre for High Energy Physics, Indian Institute of ScienceAbstract We consider the diagonal limit of the conformal bootstrap in arbitrary dimensions and investigate the question if physical theories are given in terms of cyclic polytopes. Recently, it has been pointed out that in d = 1, the geometric understanding of the boot- strap equations for unitary theories leads to cyclic polytopes for which the faces can all be written down and, in principle, the intersection between the unitarity polytope and the crossing plane can be systematically explored. We find that in higher dimensions, the natural structure that emerges, due to the inclusion of spin, is the weighted Minkowski sum of cyclic polytopes. While it can be explicitly shown that for physical theories, the weighted Minkowski sum of cyclic polytopes is not a cyclic polytope, it also turns out that in the large conformal dimension limit it is indeed a cyclic polytope. We write down several analytic formulae in this limit and show that remarkably, in many cases, this works out to be very good approximation even for O (1) conformal dimensions. Furthermore, we initiate a comparison between usual numerics obtained using linear programming and what arises from positive geometry considerations.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP11(2019)059Conformal Field TheoryScattering Amplitudes
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kallol Sen
Aninda Sinha
Ahmadullah Zahed
spellingShingle Kallol Sen
Aninda Sinha
Ahmadullah Zahed
Positive geometry in the diagonal limit of the conformal bootstrap
Journal of High Energy Physics
Conformal Field Theory
Scattering Amplitudes
author_facet Kallol Sen
Aninda Sinha
Ahmadullah Zahed
author_sort Kallol Sen
title Positive geometry in the diagonal limit of the conformal bootstrap
title_short Positive geometry in the diagonal limit of the conformal bootstrap
title_full Positive geometry in the diagonal limit of the conformal bootstrap
title_fullStr Positive geometry in the diagonal limit of the conformal bootstrap
title_full_unstemmed Positive geometry in the diagonal limit of the conformal bootstrap
title_sort positive geometry in the diagonal limit of the conformal bootstrap
publisher SpringerOpen
series Journal of High Energy Physics
issn 1029-8479
publishDate 2019-11-01
description Abstract We consider the diagonal limit of the conformal bootstrap in arbitrary dimensions and investigate the question if physical theories are given in terms of cyclic polytopes. Recently, it has been pointed out that in d = 1, the geometric understanding of the boot- strap equations for unitary theories leads to cyclic polytopes for which the faces can all be written down and, in principle, the intersection between the unitarity polytope and the crossing plane can be systematically explored. We find that in higher dimensions, the natural structure that emerges, due to the inclusion of spin, is the weighted Minkowski sum of cyclic polytopes. While it can be explicitly shown that for physical theories, the weighted Minkowski sum of cyclic polytopes is not a cyclic polytope, it also turns out that in the large conformal dimension limit it is indeed a cyclic polytope. We write down several analytic formulae in this limit and show that remarkably, in many cases, this works out to be very good approximation even for O (1) conformal dimensions. Furthermore, we initiate a comparison between usual numerics obtained using linear programming and what arises from positive geometry considerations.
topic Conformal Field Theory
Scattering Amplitudes
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP11(2019)059
work_keys_str_mv AT kallolsen positivegeometryinthediagonallimitoftheconformalbootstrap
AT anindasinha positivegeometryinthediagonallimitoftheconformalbootstrap
AT ahmadullahzahed positivegeometryinthediagonallimitoftheconformalbootstrap
_version_ 1724422864880271360