Easiness of Image Interpretation of Spot XS and Landsat TM for Urban Land Cover Object Identification

The study that has been out for URGE project “Remote sensing for urban study and landuse planning” is a  especially the possibility and the easiness of interpretability. The easiness of interpretation of satellite image is influenced by sensor, and the physical condition of urban area. SPOT image re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Agus Suryantoro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Muhammadiyah University Press 2004-01-01
Series:Forum Geografi
Online Access:http://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/fg/article/view/594
id doaj-ae322be91bf845adb05b7681aff6fd67
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ae322be91bf845adb05b7681aff6fd672020-11-24T22:23:39ZengMuhammadiyah University PressForum Geografi0852-06822460-39452004-01-01171465Easiness of Image Interpretation of Spot XS and Landsat TM for Urban Land Cover Object IdentificationAgus SuryantoroThe study that has been out for URGE project “Remote sensing for urban study and landuse planning” is a  especially the possibility and the easiness of interpretability. The easiness of interpretation of satellite image is influenced by sensor, and the physical condition of urban area. SPOT image recorded in 1996 and TM Landsat image recorded in 1994 by the process of digital image are used as the comparison of easiness of interpretation. The contras sharpening method using a filter, the arrangement of composite image, and multispectral classification is applied by respective image. The introduction of covered object of urban area is based on the introduction of spatial and spectral pattern. Visual and digital interpretation that based on multispectral classification has been done to get the accurateness of classification result. The result of this study shows that SPOT image has better detail information than TM Lansat image. But the spectral information of TM Lansat image has more varieties than that of SPOT image so that certain objects, especially straight appearance (street, river, etc) can be  know more by TM Lansat.http://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/fg/article/view/594
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Agus Suryantoro
spellingShingle Agus Suryantoro
Easiness of Image Interpretation of Spot XS and Landsat TM for Urban Land Cover Object Identification
Forum Geografi
author_facet Agus Suryantoro
author_sort Agus Suryantoro
title Easiness of Image Interpretation of Spot XS and Landsat TM for Urban Land Cover Object Identification
title_short Easiness of Image Interpretation of Spot XS and Landsat TM for Urban Land Cover Object Identification
title_full Easiness of Image Interpretation of Spot XS and Landsat TM for Urban Land Cover Object Identification
title_fullStr Easiness of Image Interpretation of Spot XS and Landsat TM for Urban Land Cover Object Identification
title_full_unstemmed Easiness of Image Interpretation of Spot XS and Landsat TM for Urban Land Cover Object Identification
title_sort easiness of image interpretation of spot xs and landsat tm for urban land cover object identification
publisher Muhammadiyah University Press
series Forum Geografi
issn 0852-0682
2460-3945
publishDate 2004-01-01
description The study that has been out for URGE project “Remote sensing for urban study and landuse planning” is a  especially the possibility and the easiness of interpretability. The easiness of interpretation of satellite image is influenced by sensor, and the physical condition of urban area. SPOT image recorded in 1996 and TM Landsat image recorded in 1994 by the process of digital image are used as the comparison of easiness of interpretation. The contras sharpening method using a filter, the arrangement of composite image, and multispectral classification is applied by respective image. The introduction of covered object of urban area is based on the introduction of spatial and spectral pattern. Visual and digital interpretation that based on multispectral classification has been done to get the accurateness of classification result. The result of this study shows that SPOT image has better detail information than TM Lansat image. But the spectral information of TM Lansat image has more varieties than that of SPOT image so that certain objects, especially straight appearance (street, river, etc) can be  know more by TM Lansat.
url http://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/fg/article/view/594
work_keys_str_mv AT agussuryantoro easinessofimageinterpretationofspotxsandlandsattmforurbanlandcoverobjectidentification
_version_ 1725764423781449728