The Fluidity of the Fantastic: Todorov’s Legacy to Literary Criticism

<p>This article addresses the contemporary significance of Tzvetan Todorov’s seminal essay The Fantastic. A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre. The enduring contribution of Todorov’s essay to literary theory and criticism is examined in the first part of the discussion which focuses on th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Eugenio Bolongaro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Università degli studi di Trento 2014-05-01
Series:Ticontre: Teoria Testo Traduzione
Online Access:http://www.ticontre.org/ojs/index.php/t3/article/view/18
id doaj-ae01a06ef70744dc87e6d4384d58beb6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ae01a06ef70744dc87e6d4384d58beb62020-11-24T20:52:50ZengUniversità degli studi di TrentoTicontre: Teoria Testo Traduzione2284-44732284-44732014-05-0111618313The Fluidity of the Fantastic: Todorov’s Legacy to Literary CriticismEugenio Bolongaro0McGill University<p>This article addresses the contemporary significance of Tzvetan Todorov’s seminal essay The Fantastic. A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre. The enduring contribution of Todorov’s essay to literary theory and criticism is examined in the first part of the discussion which focuses on three key mo- ments in the critic’s argument: the defense of genre as a crucial conceptual category for literary analysis, the concept of hesitation or wavering which is at the core of the definition of the fantastic genre, and the idea that there is strong link between the fantastic genre and the acceleration of plot. It is argued that each of these moments remains richly suggestive and productively engage contemporary preoccupations about the role of literary theory and the complex inter-relation between realist and non-realist fiction, as well as the ethical dimension of literary narratives. The second part of the essay approaches The Fantastic as a work of rather than merely about literature. From this perspective the essay emerges as the trace of a fascinating conceptual adventure. A careful rereading of Todorov’s work reveals the genesis, evolution and eventual disper- sion of the critic’s insights as they break out of the initial structuralist framework and open horizons that Todorov’s himself did not anticipate and can- not fully control. This excess of meaning is the surest evidence of Todorov’s outstanding achievement.</p>http://www.ticontre.org/ojs/index.php/t3/article/view/18
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eugenio Bolongaro
spellingShingle Eugenio Bolongaro
The Fluidity of the Fantastic: Todorov’s Legacy to Literary Criticism
Ticontre: Teoria Testo Traduzione
author_facet Eugenio Bolongaro
author_sort Eugenio Bolongaro
title The Fluidity of the Fantastic: Todorov’s Legacy to Literary Criticism
title_short The Fluidity of the Fantastic: Todorov’s Legacy to Literary Criticism
title_full The Fluidity of the Fantastic: Todorov’s Legacy to Literary Criticism
title_fullStr The Fluidity of the Fantastic: Todorov’s Legacy to Literary Criticism
title_full_unstemmed The Fluidity of the Fantastic: Todorov’s Legacy to Literary Criticism
title_sort fluidity of the fantastic: todorov’s legacy to literary criticism
publisher Università degli studi di Trento
series Ticontre: Teoria Testo Traduzione
issn 2284-4473
2284-4473
publishDate 2014-05-01
description <p>This article addresses the contemporary significance of Tzvetan Todorov’s seminal essay The Fantastic. A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre. The enduring contribution of Todorov’s essay to literary theory and criticism is examined in the first part of the discussion which focuses on three key mo- ments in the critic’s argument: the defense of genre as a crucial conceptual category for literary analysis, the concept of hesitation or wavering which is at the core of the definition of the fantastic genre, and the idea that there is strong link between the fantastic genre and the acceleration of plot. It is argued that each of these moments remains richly suggestive and productively engage contemporary preoccupations about the role of literary theory and the complex inter-relation between realist and non-realist fiction, as well as the ethical dimension of literary narratives. The second part of the essay approaches The Fantastic as a work of rather than merely about literature. From this perspective the essay emerges as the trace of a fascinating conceptual adventure. A careful rereading of Todorov’s work reveals the genesis, evolution and eventual disper- sion of the critic’s insights as they break out of the initial structuralist framework and open horizons that Todorov’s himself did not anticipate and can- not fully control. This excess of meaning is the surest evidence of Todorov’s outstanding achievement.</p>
url http://www.ticontre.org/ojs/index.php/t3/article/view/18
work_keys_str_mv AT eugeniobolongaro thefluidityofthefantastictodorovslegacytoliterarycriticism
AT eugeniobolongaro fluidityofthefantastictodorovslegacytoliterarycriticism
_version_ 1716798833540726784