Mobile Phones, Non-Ionizing Radiofrequency Fields and Brain Cancer: Is There an Adaptive Response?

There is widespread concern among the general public regarding the ever increasing use of mobile phones. The concern is mainly because the antenna which transmits non-ionizing radiofrequency fields is held close to the head during use and thus might cause brain cancer. By far, the largest epidemiolo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vijayalaxmi, Thomas J. Prihoda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2014-07-01
Series:Dose-Response
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2203/dose-response.14-012.Vijayalaxmi
id doaj-adf47cff53a7474c807f23b4d22f386e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-adf47cff53a7474c807f23b4d22f386e2020-11-25T02:34:07ZengSAGE PublishingDose-Response1559-32582014-07-011210.2203/dose-response.14-012.VijayalaxmiMobile Phones, Non-Ionizing Radiofrequency Fields and Brain Cancer: Is There an Adaptive Response? VijayalaxmiThomas J. PrihodaThere is widespread concern among the general public regarding the ever increasing use of mobile phones. The concern is mainly because the antenna which transmits non-ionizing radiofrequency fields is held close to the head during use and thus might cause brain cancer. By far, the largest epidemiological study was conducted by the INTERPHONE study group and the results were published in 2011. The author's conclusions were (i) no increased risk of meningioma and glioma in mobile phone users and (ii) there were suggestions of an increased risk for glioma at the highest exposure levels but, bias and error prevented a causal interpretation. We have carefully examined all of the odd ratios presented in the INTERPHONE study publication: our results showed 24.3% decreased and 0.7% increased risk for meningioma and 22.1% decreased and 6.6% increased risk for glioma. Hence, we hypothesize that the overwhelming evidence for the decreased risk for both diseases may be due to the induction of ‘adaptive response’ which is well-documented in scientific literaturehttps://doi.org/10.2203/dose-response.14-012.Vijayalaxmi
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vijayalaxmi
Thomas J. Prihoda
spellingShingle Vijayalaxmi
Thomas J. Prihoda
Mobile Phones, Non-Ionizing Radiofrequency Fields and Brain Cancer: Is There an Adaptive Response?
Dose-Response
author_facet Vijayalaxmi
Thomas J. Prihoda
author_sort Vijayalaxmi
title Mobile Phones, Non-Ionizing Radiofrequency Fields and Brain Cancer: Is There an Adaptive Response?
title_short Mobile Phones, Non-Ionizing Radiofrequency Fields and Brain Cancer: Is There an Adaptive Response?
title_full Mobile Phones, Non-Ionizing Radiofrequency Fields and Brain Cancer: Is There an Adaptive Response?
title_fullStr Mobile Phones, Non-Ionizing Radiofrequency Fields and Brain Cancer: Is There an Adaptive Response?
title_full_unstemmed Mobile Phones, Non-Ionizing Radiofrequency Fields and Brain Cancer: Is There an Adaptive Response?
title_sort mobile phones, non-ionizing radiofrequency fields and brain cancer: is there an adaptive response?
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Dose-Response
issn 1559-3258
publishDate 2014-07-01
description There is widespread concern among the general public regarding the ever increasing use of mobile phones. The concern is mainly because the antenna which transmits non-ionizing radiofrequency fields is held close to the head during use and thus might cause brain cancer. By far, the largest epidemiological study was conducted by the INTERPHONE study group and the results were published in 2011. The author's conclusions were (i) no increased risk of meningioma and glioma in mobile phone users and (ii) there were suggestions of an increased risk for glioma at the highest exposure levels but, bias and error prevented a causal interpretation. We have carefully examined all of the odd ratios presented in the INTERPHONE study publication: our results showed 24.3% decreased and 0.7% increased risk for meningioma and 22.1% decreased and 6.6% increased risk for glioma. Hence, we hypothesize that the overwhelming evidence for the decreased risk for both diseases may be due to the induction of ‘adaptive response’ which is well-documented in scientific literature
url https://doi.org/10.2203/dose-response.14-012.Vijayalaxmi
work_keys_str_mv AT vijayalaxmi mobilephonesnonionizingradiofrequencyfieldsandbraincanceristhereanadaptiveresponse
AT thomasjprihoda mobilephonesnonionizingradiofrequencyfieldsandbraincanceristhereanadaptiveresponse
_version_ 1724810039939563520