Schumpeterian growth theory: Empirical testing of barriers to competition effect
This study is dedicated to empirical testing of barriers to competition effect on productivity growth, taking into account the hypothesis that different policies improve economic growth in countries at different levels of technological development. The results of econometric analysis of two...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Faculty of Economics, Belgrade
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Ekonomski Anali |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0013-3264/2018/0013-32641817007P.pdf |
id |
doaj-add9c1aeaa7e42648b4190d0483116e6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-add9c1aeaa7e42648b4190d0483116e62020-11-24T21:12:51ZengFaculty of Economics, BelgradeEkonomski Anali0013-32641820-73752018-01-016321773710.2298/EKA1817007P0013-32641817007PSchumpeterian growth theory: Empirical testing of barriers to competition effectPetrović Predrag0Nikolić Goran1Institute of Social Sciences, Belgrade, Ph.DInstitute of Social Sciences, Belgrade, Ph.DThis study is dedicated to empirical testing of barriers to competition effect on productivity growth, taking into account the hypothesis that different policies improve economic growth in countries at different levels of technological development. The results of econometric analysis of two panel data sets comprising 144 countries (not controlled for education) and 128 countries (controlled for education) have demonstrated that when approaching the technology frontier, countries with high barriers to competition lose their productivity growth much faster than countries with a low barrier, which is the direct result of the decreasing but positive influence of barriers to competition on productivity growth, regardless of whether the economy is underdeveloped or advanced. This positive effect of barriers can be rationalized by Romer’s (1990) product variety model; or possibly by the inverted-U pattern between competition and innovation proved by Aghion et al. (2005), under the assumption that these sample countries are on the downward slope. Finally, the positive effect of barriers, irrespective of the degree of the countries’ technological development, implies that the theory is not completely consistent with empirical data. [Project of the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Grant no. III47010 and Grant no. 179014]http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0013-3264/2018/0013-32641817007P.pdfSchumpeterian growth theoryproductivity growthbarriers to competitionproximity to frontiertechnology frontiereducation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Petrović Predrag Nikolić Goran |
spellingShingle |
Petrović Predrag Nikolić Goran Schumpeterian growth theory: Empirical testing of barriers to competition effect Ekonomski Anali Schumpeterian growth theory productivity growth barriers to competition proximity to frontier technology frontier education |
author_facet |
Petrović Predrag Nikolić Goran |
author_sort |
Petrović Predrag |
title |
Schumpeterian growth theory: Empirical testing of barriers to competition effect |
title_short |
Schumpeterian growth theory: Empirical testing of barriers to competition effect |
title_full |
Schumpeterian growth theory: Empirical testing of barriers to competition effect |
title_fullStr |
Schumpeterian growth theory: Empirical testing of barriers to competition effect |
title_full_unstemmed |
Schumpeterian growth theory: Empirical testing of barriers to competition effect |
title_sort |
schumpeterian growth theory: empirical testing of barriers to competition effect |
publisher |
Faculty of Economics, Belgrade |
series |
Ekonomski Anali |
issn |
0013-3264 1820-7375 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
This study is dedicated to empirical testing of barriers to competition
effect on productivity growth, taking into account the hypothesis that
different policies improve economic growth in countries at different levels
of technological development. The results of econometric analysis of two
panel data sets comprising 144 countries (not controlled for education) and
128 countries (controlled for education) have demonstrated that when
approaching the technology frontier, countries with high barriers to
competition lose their productivity growth much faster than countries with a
low barrier, which is the direct result of the decreasing but positive
influence of barriers to competition on productivity growth, regardless of
whether the economy is underdeveloped or advanced. This positive effect of
barriers can be rationalized by Romer’s (1990) product variety model; or
possibly by the inverted-U pattern between competition and innovation proved
by Aghion et al. (2005), under the assumption that these sample countries are
on the downward slope. Finally, the positive effect of barriers, irrespective
of the degree of the countries’ technological development, implies that the
theory is not completely consistent with empirical data. [Project of the
Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Grant
no. III47010 and Grant no. 179014] |
topic |
Schumpeterian growth theory productivity growth barriers to competition proximity to frontier technology frontier education |
url |
http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0013-3264/2018/0013-32641817007P.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT petrovicpredrag schumpeteriangrowththeoryempiricaltestingofbarrierstocompetitioneffect AT nikolicgoran schumpeteriangrowththeoryempiricaltestingofbarrierstocompetitioneffect |
_version_ |
1716749805780205568 |