Schumpeterian growth theory: Empirical testing of barriers to competition effect

This study is dedicated to empirical testing of barriers to competition effect on productivity growth, taking into account the hypothesis that different policies improve economic growth in countries at different levels of technological development. The results of econometric analysis of two...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Petrović Predrag, Nikolić Goran
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Economics, Belgrade 2018-01-01
Series:Ekonomski Anali
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0013-3264/2018/0013-32641817007P.pdf
id doaj-add9c1aeaa7e42648b4190d0483116e6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-add9c1aeaa7e42648b4190d0483116e62020-11-24T21:12:51ZengFaculty of Economics, BelgradeEkonomski Anali0013-32641820-73752018-01-016321773710.2298/EKA1817007P0013-32641817007PSchumpeterian growth theory: Empirical testing of barriers to competition effectPetrović Predrag0Nikolić Goran1Institute of Social Sciences, Belgrade, Ph.DInstitute of Social Sciences, Belgrade, Ph.DThis study is dedicated to empirical testing of barriers to competition effect on productivity growth, taking into account the hypothesis that different policies improve economic growth in countries at different levels of technological development. The results of econometric analysis of two panel data sets comprising 144 countries (not controlled for education) and 128 countries (controlled for education) have demonstrated that when approaching the technology frontier, countries with high barriers to competition lose their productivity growth much faster than countries with a low barrier, which is the direct result of the decreasing but positive influence of barriers to competition on productivity growth, regardless of whether the economy is underdeveloped or advanced. This positive effect of barriers can be rationalized by Romer’s (1990) product variety model; or possibly by the inverted-U pattern between competition and innovation proved by Aghion et al. (2005), under the assumption that these sample countries are on the downward slope. Finally, the positive effect of barriers, irrespective of the degree of the countries’ technological development, implies that the theory is not completely consistent with empirical data. [Project of the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Grant no. III47010 and Grant no. 179014]http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0013-3264/2018/0013-32641817007P.pdfSchumpeterian growth theoryproductivity growthbarriers to competitionproximity to frontiertechnology frontiereducation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Petrović Predrag
Nikolić Goran
spellingShingle Petrović Predrag
Nikolić Goran
Schumpeterian growth theory: Empirical testing of barriers to competition effect
Ekonomski Anali
Schumpeterian growth theory
productivity growth
barriers to competition
proximity to frontier
technology frontier
education
author_facet Petrović Predrag
Nikolić Goran
author_sort Petrović Predrag
title Schumpeterian growth theory: Empirical testing of barriers to competition effect
title_short Schumpeterian growth theory: Empirical testing of barriers to competition effect
title_full Schumpeterian growth theory: Empirical testing of barriers to competition effect
title_fullStr Schumpeterian growth theory: Empirical testing of barriers to competition effect
title_full_unstemmed Schumpeterian growth theory: Empirical testing of barriers to competition effect
title_sort schumpeterian growth theory: empirical testing of barriers to competition effect
publisher Faculty of Economics, Belgrade
series Ekonomski Anali
issn 0013-3264
1820-7375
publishDate 2018-01-01
description This study is dedicated to empirical testing of barriers to competition effect on productivity growth, taking into account the hypothesis that different policies improve economic growth in countries at different levels of technological development. The results of econometric analysis of two panel data sets comprising 144 countries (not controlled for education) and 128 countries (controlled for education) have demonstrated that when approaching the technology frontier, countries with high barriers to competition lose their productivity growth much faster than countries with a low barrier, which is the direct result of the decreasing but positive influence of barriers to competition on productivity growth, regardless of whether the economy is underdeveloped or advanced. This positive effect of barriers can be rationalized by Romer’s (1990) product variety model; or possibly by the inverted-U pattern between competition and innovation proved by Aghion et al. (2005), under the assumption that these sample countries are on the downward slope. Finally, the positive effect of barriers, irrespective of the degree of the countries’ technological development, implies that the theory is not completely consistent with empirical data. [Project of the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Grant no. III47010 and Grant no. 179014]
topic Schumpeterian growth theory
productivity growth
barriers to competition
proximity to frontier
technology frontier
education
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0013-3264/2018/0013-32641817007P.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT petrovicpredrag schumpeteriangrowththeoryempiricaltestingofbarrierstocompetitioneffect
AT nikolicgoran schumpeteriangrowththeoryempiricaltestingofbarrierstocompetitioneffect
_version_ 1716749805780205568