Suprapubic Cystostomy for the Management of Urethral Injuries During Penile Prosthesis Implantation

Introduction: Urethral injury is an uncommon surgical complication of penile prosthesis (PP) surgery. Conventional dogma requires abortion of the procedure if the adjacent corporal body is involved or delayed implantation to avert device infection associated with urinary extravasation. Besides the s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Uzoma A. Anele, MD, Brian V. Le, MD, Arthur L. Burnett, MD, MBA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2014-12-01
Series:Sexual Medicine
Subjects:
SPT
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2050116115300015
id doaj-adcfabc2fe104dc2bbabc966e25fcb2c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-adcfabc2fe104dc2bbabc966e25fcb2c2020-11-24T23:26:23ZengElsevierSexual Medicine2050-11612014-12-012417818110.1002/sm2.44Suprapubic Cystostomy for the Management of Urethral Injuries During Penile Prosthesis ImplantationUzoma A. Anele, MDBrian V. Le, MDArthur L. Burnett, MD, MBAIntroduction: Urethral injury is an uncommon surgical complication of penile prosthesis (PP) surgery. Conventional dogma requires abortion of the procedure if the adjacent corporal body is involved or delayed implantation to avert device infection associated with urinary extravasation. Besides the setback of the aborted surgery, this management approach also presents the possible difficulty of encountering corporal fibrosis at the time of reoperation. Aim: We report an approach using primary urethral repair and temporary suprapubic cystostomy for the management of incidental urethral injuries in a cohort of patients allowing for successful completion of unaborted PP implantation. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients receiving PPs from 1990 to 2014 in which incidental urethral injuries were repaired and PP implantation was completed with suprapubic cystostomy (suprapubic tube [SPT] insertion). After allowing for urethral healing and urinary diversion via SPT for 4–8 weeks, the PP was activated. Main Outcome Measures: Successful management was determined by the absence of perioperative complications within 6 months of implantation. Results: We identified four cases, all receiving inflatable PPs, managed with temporary suprapubic cystostomy. These patients sustained urethral injuries during corporal dissection (one patient), corporal dilation (one patient), and penile straightening (two patients). All patients were managed safely and successfully. Conclusion: Primary urethral repair followed by temporary suprapubic cystostomy offers a surgical approach to complete PP implantation successfully in patients who sustain urethral injury complications, particularly for complex PP surgeries. Anele UA, Le BV, and Burnett AL. Suprapubic cystostomy for the management of urethral injuries during penile prosthesis implantation. Sex Med 2014;2:178–181.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2050116115300015Penile ReconstructionPenile FibrosisCorporal DilationErectile DysfunctionSPT
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Uzoma A. Anele, MD
Brian V. Le, MD
Arthur L. Burnett, MD, MBA
spellingShingle Uzoma A. Anele, MD
Brian V. Le, MD
Arthur L. Burnett, MD, MBA
Suprapubic Cystostomy for the Management of Urethral Injuries During Penile Prosthesis Implantation
Sexual Medicine
Penile Reconstruction
Penile Fibrosis
Corporal Dilation
Erectile Dysfunction
SPT
author_facet Uzoma A. Anele, MD
Brian V. Le, MD
Arthur L. Burnett, MD, MBA
author_sort Uzoma A. Anele, MD
title Suprapubic Cystostomy for the Management of Urethral Injuries During Penile Prosthesis Implantation
title_short Suprapubic Cystostomy for the Management of Urethral Injuries During Penile Prosthesis Implantation
title_full Suprapubic Cystostomy for the Management of Urethral Injuries During Penile Prosthesis Implantation
title_fullStr Suprapubic Cystostomy for the Management of Urethral Injuries During Penile Prosthesis Implantation
title_full_unstemmed Suprapubic Cystostomy for the Management of Urethral Injuries During Penile Prosthesis Implantation
title_sort suprapubic cystostomy for the management of urethral injuries during penile prosthesis implantation
publisher Elsevier
series Sexual Medicine
issn 2050-1161
publishDate 2014-12-01
description Introduction: Urethral injury is an uncommon surgical complication of penile prosthesis (PP) surgery. Conventional dogma requires abortion of the procedure if the adjacent corporal body is involved or delayed implantation to avert device infection associated with urinary extravasation. Besides the setback of the aborted surgery, this management approach also presents the possible difficulty of encountering corporal fibrosis at the time of reoperation. Aim: We report an approach using primary urethral repair and temporary suprapubic cystostomy for the management of incidental urethral injuries in a cohort of patients allowing for successful completion of unaborted PP implantation. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients receiving PPs from 1990 to 2014 in which incidental urethral injuries were repaired and PP implantation was completed with suprapubic cystostomy (suprapubic tube [SPT] insertion). After allowing for urethral healing and urinary diversion via SPT for 4–8 weeks, the PP was activated. Main Outcome Measures: Successful management was determined by the absence of perioperative complications within 6 months of implantation. Results: We identified four cases, all receiving inflatable PPs, managed with temporary suprapubic cystostomy. These patients sustained urethral injuries during corporal dissection (one patient), corporal dilation (one patient), and penile straightening (two patients). All patients were managed safely and successfully. Conclusion: Primary urethral repair followed by temporary suprapubic cystostomy offers a surgical approach to complete PP implantation successfully in patients who sustain urethral injury complications, particularly for complex PP surgeries. Anele UA, Le BV, and Burnett AL. Suprapubic cystostomy for the management of urethral injuries during penile prosthesis implantation. Sex Med 2014;2:178–181.
topic Penile Reconstruction
Penile Fibrosis
Corporal Dilation
Erectile Dysfunction
SPT
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2050116115300015
work_keys_str_mv AT uzomaaanelemd suprapubiccystostomyforthemanagementofurethralinjuriesduringpenileprosthesisimplantation
AT brianvlemd suprapubiccystostomyforthemanagementofurethralinjuriesduringpenileprosthesisimplantation
AT arthurlburnettmdmba suprapubiccystostomyforthemanagementofurethralinjuriesduringpenileprosthesisimplantation
_version_ 1725555469786808320