Evaluating urban environmental and ecological landscape characteristics as a function of land-sharing-sparing, urbanity and scale.
Within urban landscape planning, debate continues around the relative merits of land-sharing (sprawl) and land-sparing (compaction) scenarios. Using three of the ten districts in Greater Manchester (UK) as a case-study, we present a landscape approach to mapping green infrastructure and variation in...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2019-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215796 |
id |
doaj-adc81ed179044c76864fa06d8bee7e0d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-adc81ed179044c76864fa06d8bee7e0d2021-03-03T20:33:26ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01147e021579610.1371/journal.pone.0215796Evaluating urban environmental and ecological landscape characteristics as a function of land-sharing-sparing, urbanity and scale.Matthew DennisKatherine L ScalettaPhilip JamesWithin urban landscape planning, debate continues around the relative merits of land-sharing (sprawl) and land-sparing (compaction) scenarios. Using three of the ten districts in Greater Manchester (UK) as a case-study, we present a landscape approach to mapping green infrastructure and variation in social-ecological-environmental conditions as a function of land sharing and sparing. We do so for the landscape as a whole and in a more focussed approach for areas of high and low urbanity. Results imply potential trade-offs between land-sharing-sparing scenarios relevant to characteristics critical to urban resilience such as landscape connectivity and diversity, air quality, surface temperature, and access to green space. These trade-offs are complex due to the parallel influence of patch attributes such as land-cover and size and imply that both ecological restoration and spatial planning have a role to play in reconciling tensions between land-sharing and sparing strategies.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215796 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Matthew Dennis Katherine L Scaletta Philip James |
spellingShingle |
Matthew Dennis Katherine L Scaletta Philip James Evaluating urban environmental and ecological landscape characteristics as a function of land-sharing-sparing, urbanity and scale. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Matthew Dennis Katherine L Scaletta Philip James |
author_sort |
Matthew Dennis |
title |
Evaluating urban environmental and ecological landscape characteristics as a function of land-sharing-sparing, urbanity and scale. |
title_short |
Evaluating urban environmental and ecological landscape characteristics as a function of land-sharing-sparing, urbanity and scale. |
title_full |
Evaluating urban environmental and ecological landscape characteristics as a function of land-sharing-sparing, urbanity and scale. |
title_fullStr |
Evaluating urban environmental and ecological landscape characteristics as a function of land-sharing-sparing, urbanity and scale. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluating urban environmental and ecological landscape characteristics as a function of land-sharing-sparing, urbanity and scale. |
title_sort |
evaluating urban environmental and ecological landscape characteristics as a function of land-sharing-sparing, urbanity and scale. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
Within urban landscape planning, debate continues around the relative merits of land-sharing (sprawl) and land-sparing (compaction) scenarios. Using three of the ten districts in Greater Manchester (UK) as a case-study, we present a landscape approach to mapping green infrastructure and variation in social-ecological-environmental conditions as a function of land sharing and sparing. We do so for the landscape as a whole and in a more focussed approach for areas of high and low urbanity. Results imply potential trade-offs between land-sharing-sparing scenarios relevant to characteristics critical to urban resilience such as landscape connectivity and diversity, air quality, surface temperature, and access to green space. These trade-offs are complex due to the parallel influence of patch attributes such as land-cover and size and imply that both ecological restoration and spatial planning have a role to play in reconciling tensions between land-sharing and sparing strategies. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215796 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT matthewdennis evaluatingurbanenvironmentalandecologicallandscapecharacteristicsasafunctionoflandsharingsparingurbanityandscale AT katherinelscaletta evaluatingurbanenvironmentalandecologicallandscapecharacteristicsasafunctionoflandsharingsparingurbanityandscale AT philipjames evaluatingurbanenvironmentalandecologicallandscapecharacteristicsasafunctionoflandsharingsparingurbanityandscale |
_version_ |
1714821920099139584 |