Evaluating urban environmental and ecological landscape characteristics as a function of land-sharing-sparing, urbanity and scale.

Within urban landscape planning, debate continues around the relative merits of land-sharing (sprawl) and land-sparing (compaction) scenarios. Using three of the ten districts in Greater Manchester (UK) as a case-study, we present a landscape approach to mapping green infrastructure and variation in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthew Dennis, Katherine L Scaletta, Philip James
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215796
id doaj-adc81ed179044c76864fa06d8bee7e0d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-adc81ed179044c76864fa06d8bee7e0d2021-03-03T20:33:26ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01147e021579610.1371/journal.pone.0215796Evaluating urban environmental and ecological landscape characteristics as a function of land-sharing-sparing, urbanity and scale.Matthew DennisKatherine L ScalettaPhilip JamesWithin urban landscape planning, debate continues around the relative merits of land-sharing (sprawl) and land-sparing (compaction) scenarios. Using three of the ten districts in Greater Manchester (UK) as a case-study, we present a landscape approach to mapping green infrastructure and variation in social-ecological-environmental conditions as a function of land sharing and sparing. We do so for the landscape as a whole and in a more focussed approach for areas of high and low urbanity. Results imply potential trade-offs between land-sharing-sparing scenarios relevant to characteristics critical to urban resilience such as landscape connectivity and diversity, air quality, surface temperature, and access to green space. These trade-offs are complex due to the parallel influence of patch attributes such as land-cover and size and imply that both ecological restoration and spatial planning have a role to play in reconciling tensions between land-sharing and sparing strategies.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215796
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matthew Dennis
Katherine L Scaletta
Philip James
spellingShingle Matthew Dennis
Katherine L Scaletta
Philip James
Evaluating urban environmental and ecological landscape characteristics as a function of land-sharing-sparing, urbanity and scale.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Matthew Dennis
Katherine L Scaletta
Philip James
author_sort Matthew Dennis
title Evaluating urban environmental and ecological landscape characteristics as a function of land-sharing-sparing, urbanity and scale.
title_short Evaluating urban environmental and ecological landscape characteristics as a function of land-sharing-sparing, urbanity and scale.
title_full Evaluating urban environmental and ecological landscape characteristics as a function of land-sharing-sparing, urbanity and scale.
title_fullStr Evaluating urban environmental and ecological landscape characteristics as a function of land-sharing-sparing, urbanity and scale.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating urban environmental and ecological landscape characteristics as a function of land-sharing-sparing, urbanity and scale.
title_sort evaluating urban environmental and ecological landscape characteristics as a function of land-sharing-sparing, urbanity and scale.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Within urban landscape planning, debate continues around the relative merits of land-sharing (sprawl) and land-sparing (compaction) scenarios. Using three of the ten districts in Greater Manchester (UK) as a case-study, we present a landscape approach to mapping green infrastructure and variation in social-ecological-environmental conditions as a function of land sharing and sparing. We do so for the landscape as a whole and in a more focussed approach for areas of high and low urbanity. Results imply potential trade-offs between land-sharing-sparing scenarios relevant to characteristics critical to urban resilience such as landscape connectivity and diversity, air quality, surface temperature, and access to green space. These trade-offs are complex due to the parallel influence of patch attributes such as land-cover and size and imply that both ecological restoration and spatial planning have a role to play in reconciling tensions between land-sharing and sparing strategies.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215796
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewdennis evaluatingurbanenvironmentalandecologicallandscapecharacteristicsasafunctionoflandsharingsparingurbanityandscale
AT katherinelscaletta evaluatingurbanenvironmentalandecologicallandscapecharacteristicsasafunctionoflandsharingsparingurbanityandscale
AT philipjames evaluatingurbanenvironmentalandecologicallandscapecharacteristicsasafunctionoflandsharingsparingurbanityandscale
_version_ 1714821920099139584