Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis
Abstract Background Prostate MRI has become a corner stone in diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC). Diffusion weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) can be used to reflect tumor microstructure. The present analysis sought to compare ADC values of clinically insignificant with cli...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-05-01
|
Series: | BMC Cancer |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-020-06942-x |
id |
doaj-adc3daf7c31e4438a9fe1bbd37768b10 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-adc3daf7c31e4438a9fe1bbd37768b102020-11-25T02:51:34ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072020-05-0120111110.1186/s12885-020-06942-xDiscrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysisHans-Jonas Meyer0Andreas Wienke1Alexey Surov2Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of LeipzigInstitute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Informatics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-WittenbergDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of LeipzigAbstract Background Prostate MRI has become a corner stone in diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC). Diffusion weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) can be used to reflect tumor microstructure. The present analysis sought to compare ADC values of clinically insignificant with clinical significant PC based upon a large patient sample. Methods MEDLINE library and SCOPUS databases were screened for the associations between ADC and Gleason score (GS) in PC up to May 2019. The primary endpoint of the systematic review was the ADC value of PC groups according to Gleason score. In total 26 studies were suitable for the analysis and included into the present study. The included studies comprised a total of 1633 lesions. Results Clinically significant PCs (GS ≥ 7) were diagnosed in 1078 cases (66.0%) and insignificant PCs (GS 5 and 6) in 555 cases (34.0%). The pooled mean ADC value derived from monoexponenantially fitted ADCmean of the clinically significant PC was 0.86 × 10− 3 mm2/s [95% CI 0.83–0.90] and the pooled mean value of insignificant PC was 1.1 × 10− 3 mm2/s [95% CI 1.03–1.18]. Clinical significant PC showed lower ADC values compared to non-significant PC. The pooled ADC values of clinically insignificant PCs were no lower than 0.75 × 10− 3 mm2/s. Conclusions We evaluated the published literature comparing clinical insignificant with clinically prostate cancer in regard of the Apparent diffusion coefficient values derived from magnetic resonance imaging. We identified that the clinically insignificant prostate cancer have lower ADC values than clinically significant, which may aid in tumor noninvasive tumor characterization in clinical routine.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-020-06942-xMeta analysisSystematic reviewProstate cancerDWIGleason score |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hans-Jonas Meyer Andreas Wienke Alexey Surov |
spellingShingle |
Hans-Jonas Meyer Andreas Wienke Alexey Surov Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis BMC Cancer Meta analysis Systematic review Prostate cancer DWI Gleason score |
author_facet |
Hans-Jonas Meyer Andreas Wienke Alexey Surov |
author_sort |
Hans-Jonas Meyer |
title |
Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis |
title_short |
Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis |
title_full |
Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis |
title_fullStr |
Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis |
title_sort |
discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Cancer |
issn |
1471-2407 |
publishDate |
2020-05-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Prostate MRI has become a corner stone in diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC). Diffusion weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) can be used to reflect tumor microstructure. The present analysis sought to compare ADC values of clinically insignificant with clinical significant PC based upon a large patient sample. Methods MEDLINE library and SCOPUS databases were screened for the associations between ADC and Gleason score (GS) in PC up to May 2019. The primary endpoint of the systematic review was the ADC value of PC groups according to Gleason score. In total 26 studies were suitable for the analysis and included into the present study. The included studies comprised a total of 1633 lesions. Results Clinically significant PCs (GS ≥ 7) were diagnosed in 1078 cases (66.0%) and insignificant PCs (GS 5 and 6) in 555 cases (34.0%). The pooled mean ADC value derived from monoexponenantially fitted ADCmean of the clinically significant PC was 0.86 × 10− 3 mm2/s [95% CI 0.83–0.90] and the pooled mean value of insignificant PC was 1.1 × 10− 3 mm2/s [95% CI 1.03–1.18]. Clinical significant PC showed lower ADC values compared to non-significant PC. The pooled ADC values of clinically insignificant PCs were no lower than 0.75 × 10− 3 mm2/s. Conclusions We evaluated the published literature comparing clinical insignificant with clinically prostate cancer in regard of the Apparent diffusion coefficient values derived from magnetic resonance imaging. We identified that the clinically insignificant prostate cancer have lower ADC values than clinically significant, which may aid in tumor noninvasive tumor characterization in clinical routine. |
topic |
Meta analysis Systematic review Prostate cancer DWI Gleason score |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-020-06942-x |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hansjonasmeyer discriminationbetweenclinicalsignificantandinsignificantprostatecancerwithapparentdiffusioncoefficientasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT andreaswienke discriminationbetweenclinicalsignificantandinsignificantprostatecancerwithapparentdiffusioncoefficientasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT alexeysurov discriminationbetweenclinicalsignificantandinsignificantprostatecancerwithapparentdiffusioncoefficientasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |
_version_ |
1724733808280862720 |