Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis

Abstract Background Prostate MRI has become a corner stone in diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC). Diffusion weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) can be used to reflect tumor microstructure. The present analysis sought to compare ADC values of clinically insignificant with cli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hans-Jonas Meyer, Andreas Wienke, Alexey Surov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-05-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Subjects:
DWI
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-020-06942-x
id doaj-adc3daf7c31e4438a9fe1bbd37768b10
record_format Article
spelling doaj-adc3daf7c31e4438a9fe1bbd37768b102020-11-25T02:51:34ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072020-05-0120111110.1186/s12885-020-06942-xDiscrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysisHans-Jonas Meyer0Andreas Wienke1Alexey Surov2Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of LeipzigInstitute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Informatics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-WittenbergDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of LeipzigAbstract Background Prostate MRI has become a corner stone in diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC). Diffusion weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) can be used to reflect tumor microstructure. The present analysis sought to compare ADC values of clinically insignificant with clinical significant PC based upon a large patient sample. Methods MEDLINE library and SCOPUS databases were screened for the associations between ADC and Gleason score (GS) in PC up to May 2019. The primary endpoint of the systematic review was the ADC value of PC groups according to Gleason score. In total 26 studies were suitable for the analysis and included into the present study. The included studies comprised a total of 1633 lesions. Results Clinically significant PCs (GS ≥ 7) were diagnosed in 1078 cases (66.0%) and insignificant PCs (GS 5 and 6) in 555 cases (34.0%). The pooled mean ADC value derived from monoexponenantially fitted ADCmean of the clinically significant PC was 0.86 × 10− 3 mm2/s [95% CI 0.83–0.90] and the pooled mean value of insignificant PC was 1.1 × 10− 3 mm2/s [95% CI 1.03–1.18]. Clinical significant PC showed lower ADC values compared to non-significant PC. The pooled ADC values of clinically insignificant PCs were no lower than 0.75 × 10− 3 mm2/s. Conclusions We evaluated the published literature comparing clinical insignificant with clinically prostate cancer in regard of the Apparent diffusion coefficient values derived from magnetic resonance imaging. We identified that the clinically insignificant prostate cancer have lower ADC values than clinically significant, which may aid in tumor noninvasive tumor characterization in clinical routine.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-020-06942-xMeta analysisSystematic reviewProstate cancerDWIGleason score
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hans-Jonas Meyer
Andreas Wienke
Alexey Surov
spellingShingle Hans-Jonas Meyer
Andreas Wienke
Alexey Surov
Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis
BMC Cancer
Meta analysis
Systematic review
Prostate cancer
DWI
Gleason score
author_facet Hans-Jonas Meyer
Andreas Wienke
Alexey Surov
author_sort Hans-Jonas Meyer
title Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis
title_short Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis
title_full Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis
title_fullStr Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis
title_full_unstemmed Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis
title_sort discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis
publisher BMC
series BMC Cancer
issn 1471-2407
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Abstract Background Prostate MRI has become a corner stone in diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC). Diffusion weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) can be used to reflect tumor microstructure. The present analysis sought to compare ADC values of clinically insignificant with clinical significant PC based upon a large patient sample. Methods MEDLINE library and SCOPUS databases were screened for the associations between ADC and Gleason score (GS) in PC up to May 2019. The primary endpoint of the systematic review was the ADC value of PC groups according to Gleason score. In total 26 studies were suitable for the analysis and included into the present study. The included studies comprised a total of 1633 lesions. Results Clinically significant PCs (GS ≥ 7) were diagnosed in 1078 cases (66.0%) and insignificant PCs (GS 5 and 6) in 555 cases (34.0%). The pooled mean ADC value derived from monoexponenantially fitted ADCmean of the clinically significant PC was 0.86 × 10− 3 mm2/s [95% CI 0.83–0.90] and the pooled mean value of insignificant PC was 1.1 × 10− 3 mm2/s [95% CI 1.03–1.18]. Clinical significant PC showed lower ADC values compared to non-significant PC. The pooled ADC values of clinically insignificant PCs were no lower than 0.75 × 10− 3 mm2/s. Conclusions We evaluated the published literature comparing clinical insignificant with clinically prostate cancer in regard of the Apparent diffusion coefficient values derived from magnetic resonance imaging. We identified that the clinically insignificant prostate cancer have lower ADC values than clinically significant, which may aid in tumor noninvasive tumor characterization in clinical routine.
topic Meta analysis
Systematic review
Prostate cancer
DWI
Gleason score
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-020-06942-x
work_keys_str_mv AT hansjonasmeyer discriminationbetweenclinicalsignificantandinsignificantprostatecancerwithapparentdiffusioncoefficientasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT andreaswienke discriminationbetweenclinicalsignificantandinsignificantprostatecancerwithapparentdiffusioncoefficientasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alexeysurov discriminationbetweenclinicalsignificantandinsignificantprostatecancerwithapparentdiffusioncoefficientasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1724733808280862720