Student Opinions and Preferences Regarding Personal Response Systems in the Graduate Physical Therapy Classroom: A Mixed-Methods Inquiry

Little investigation has been conducted on the use of Personal Response Systems (PRS) in either graduate-level courses or health professions education. Through anonymous participation in focus groups, graduate physical therapy students described specific aspects of PRS that they felt facilitated the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andi Mincer, Anne Thompson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Georgia Southern University 2012-07-01
Series:International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol6/iss2/26
id doaj-adb7cb30ae2646de92f9f433cc1466f1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-adb7cb30ae2646de92f9f433cc1466f12020-11-25T01:12:31ZengGeorgia Southern UniversityInternational Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning1931-47442012-07-016210.20429/ijsotl.2012.060226Student Opinions and Preferences Regarding Personal Response Systems in the Graduate Physical Therapy Classroom: A Mixed-Methods InquiryAndi MincerAnne ThompsonLittle investigation has been conducted on the use of Personal Response Systems (PRS) in either graduate-level courses or health professions education. Through anonymous participation in focus groups, graduate physical therapy students described specific aspects of PRS that they felt facilitated their learning, as well as aspects that hindered their learning. A Likert-type survey was constructed based on focus group outcomes and was offered to the entire population of physical therapy students at our institution. Results indicated that PRS was perceived to be useful for examination preparation, application of concepts, facilitation of discussion, and immediate feedback. Participants perceived cost and technical issues, including lack of faculty technical expertise, as problematic. Students exhibited a strong preference for ungraded in-class quizzes, followed by provision of these quizzes to students for later study. This unique mixed-method design maximized the use of online technology for obtaining both qualitative and quantitative outcomes.https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol6/iss2/26Personal response systemsGraduate EducationHealth Professions educationScholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL)Student perceptionsHigher education
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andi Mincer
Anne Thompson
spellingShingle Andi Mincer
Anne Thompson
Student Opinions and Preferences Regarding Personal Response Systems in the Graduate Physical Therapy Classroom: A Mixed-Methods Inquiry
International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Personal response systems
Graduate Education
Health Professions education
Scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL)
Student perceptions
Higher education
author_facet Andi Mincer
Anne Thompson
author_sort Andi Mincer
title Student Opinions and Preferences Regarding Personal Response Systems in the Graduate Physical Therapy Classroom: A Mixed-Methods Inquiry
title_short Student Opinions and Preferences Regarding Personal Response Systems in the Graduate Physical Therapy Classroom: A Mixed-Methods Inquiry
title_full Student Opinions and Preferences Regarding Personal Response Systems in the Graduate Physical Therapy Classroom: A Mixed-Methods Inquiry
title_fullStr Student Opinions and Preferences Regarding Personal Response Systems in the Graduate Physical Therapy Classroom: A Mixed-Methods Inquiry
title_full_unstemmed Student Opinions and Preferences Regarding Personal Response Systems in the Graduate Physical Therapy Classroom: A Mixed-Methods Inquiry
title_sort student opinions and preferences regarding personal response systems in the graduate physical therapy classroom: a mixed-methods inquiry
publisher Georgia Southern University
series International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
issn 1931-4744
publishDate 2012-07-01
description Little investigation has been conducted on the use of Personal Response Systems (PRS) in either graduate-level courses or health professions education. Through anonymous participation in focus groups, graduate physical therapy students described specific aspects of PRS that they felt facilitated their learning, as well as aspects that hindered their learning. A Likert-type survey was constructed based on focus group outcomes and was offered to the entire population of physical therapy students at our institution. Results indicated that PRS was perceived to be useful for examination preparation, application of concepts, facilitation of discussion, and immediate feedback. Participants perceived cost and technical issues, including lack of faculty technical expertise, as problematic. Students exhibited a strong preference for ungraded in-class quizzes, followed by provision of these quizzes to students for later study. This unique mixed-method design maximized the use of online technology for obtaining both qualitative and quantitative outcomes.
topic Personal response systems
Graduate Education
Health Professions education
Scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL)
Student perceptions
Higher education
url https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol6/iss2/26
work_keys_str_mv AT andimincer studentopinionsandpreferencesregardingpersonalresponsesystemsinthegraduatephysicaltherapyclassroomamixedmethodsinquiry
AT annethompson studentopinionsandpreferencesregardingpersonalresponsesystemsinthegraduatephysicaltherapyclassroomamixedmethodsinquiry
_version_ 1725165887046025216