Student Opinions and Preferences Regarding Personal Response Systems in the Graduate Physical Therapy Classroom: A Mixed-Methods Inquiry
Little investigation has been conducted on the use of Personal Response Systems (PRS) in either graduate-level courses or health professions education. Through anonymous participation in focus groups, graduate physical therapy students described specific aspects of PRS that they felt facilitated the...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Georgia Southern University
2012-07-01
|
Series: | International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol6/iss2/26 |
id |
doaj-adb7cb30ae2646de92f9f433cc1466f1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-adb7cb30ae2646de92f9f433cc1466f12020-11-25T01:12:31ZengGeorgia Southern UniversityInternational Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning1931-47442012-07-016210.20429/ijsotl.2012.060226Student Opinions and Preferences Regarding Personal Response Systems in the Graduate Physical Therapy Classroom: A Mixed-Methods InquiryAndi MincerAnne ThompsonLittle investigation has been conducted on the use of Personal Response Systems (PRS) in either graduate-level courses or health professions education. Through anonymous participation in focus groups, graduate physical therapy students described specific aspects of PRS that they felt facilitated their learning, as well as aspects that hindered their learning. A Likert-type survey was constructed based on focus group outcomes and was offered to the entire population of physical therapy students at our institution. Results indicated that PRS was perceived to be useful for examination preparation, application of concepts, facilitation of discussion, and immediate feedback. Participants perceived cost and technical issues, including lack of faculty technical expertise, as problematic. Students exhibited a strong preference for ungraded in-class quizzes, followed by provision of these quizzes to students for later study. This unique mixed-method design maximized the use of online technology for obtaining both qualitative and quantitative outcomes.https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol6/iss2/26Personal response systemsGraduate EducationHealth Professions educationScholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL)Student perceptionsHigher education |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Andi Mincer Anne Thompson |
spellingShingle |
Andi Mincer Anne Thompson Student Opinions and Preferences Regarding Personal Response Systems in the Graduate Physical Therapy Classroom: A Mixed-Methods Inquiry International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Personal response systems Graduate Education Health Professions education Scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) Student perceptions Higher education |
author_facet |
Andi Mincer Anne Thompson |
author_sort |
Andi Mincer |
title |
Student Opinions and Preferences Regarding Personal Response Systems in the Graduate Physical Therapy Classroom: A Mixed-Methods Inquiry |
title_short |
Student Opinions and Preferences Regarding Personal Response Systems in the Graduate Physical Therapy Classroom: A Mixed-Methods Inquiry |
title_full |
Student Opinions and Preferences Regarding Personal Response Systems in the Graduate Physical Therapy Classroom: A Mixed-Methods Inquiry |
title_fullStr |
Student Opinions and Preferences Regarding Personal Response Systems in the Graduate Physical Therapy Classroom: A Mixed-Methods Inquiry |
title_full_unstemmed |
Student Opinions and Preferences Regarding Personal Response Systems in the Graduate Physical Therapy Classroom: A Mixed-Methods Inquiry |
title_sort |
student opinions and preferences regarding personal response systems in the graduate physical therapy classroom: a mixed-methods inquiry |
publisher |
Georgia Southern University |
series |
International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning |
issn |
1931-4744 |
publishDate |
2012-07-01 |
description |
Little investigation has been conducted on the use of Personal Response Systems (PRS) in either graduate-level courses or health professions education. Through anonymous participation in focus groups, graduate physical therapy students described specific aspects of PRS that they felt facilitated their learning, as well as aspects that hindered their learning. A Likert-type survey was constructed based on focus group outcomes and was offered to the entire population of physical therapy students at our institution. Results indicated that PRS was perceived to be useful for examination preparation, application of concepts, facilitation of discussion, and immediate feedback. Participants perceived cost and technical issues, including lack of faculty technical expertise, as problematic. Students exhibited a strong preference for ungraded in-class quizzes, followed by provision of these quizzes to students for later study. This unique mixed-method design maximized the use of online technology for obtaining both qualitative and quantitative outcomes. |
topic |
Personal response systems Graduate Education Health Professions education Scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) Student perceptions Higher education |
url |
https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol6/iss2/26 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andimincer studentopinionsandpreferencesregardingpersonalresponsesystemsinthegraduatephysicaltherapyclassroomamixedmethodsinquiry AT annethompson studentopinionsandpreferencesregardingpersonalresponsesystemsinthegraduatephysicaltherapyclassroomamixedmethodsinquiry |
_version_ |
1725165887046025216 |