Instruments for Detecting Moral Distress in Clinical Nurses: A Systematic Review

Moral distress (MD) has become a seriously negative problem experienced by healthcare professionals, especially clinical nurses. Early and accurate detection of MD by the validated and reliable instrument is critically important to further develop an effective intervention strategy. We performed the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xu Tian PhD, Yanfei Jin PhD, Hui Chen BSc, María F. Jiménez-Herrera PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-03-01
Series:Inquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/0046958021996499
id doaj-adaeb519ded0459b962c4207c9c71857
record_format Article
spelling doaj-adaeb519ded0459b962c4207c9c718572021-03-27T21:33:47ZengSAGE PublishingInquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing0046-95801945-72432021-03-015810.1177/0046958021996499Instruments for Detecting Moral Distress in Clinical Nurses: A Systematic ReviewXu Tian PhD0Yanfei Jin PhD1Hui Chen BSc2María F. Jiménez-Herrera PhD3Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, ChinaNursing Department, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, SpainChongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, ChinaNursing Department, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, SpainMoral distress (MD) has become a seriously negative problem experienced by healthcare professionals, especially clinical nurses. Early and accurate detection of MD by the validated and reliable instrument is critically important to further develop an effective intervention strategy. We performed the current systematic review to comprehensively summarize the evidence of instruments for the detection of MD in clinical nurses. The research design was a systematic literature review. We assigned 2 investigators to independently search potential studies in PubMed, EMBASE, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) from their inception to June 2020. We used data extraction table extracting essential information, and the modified critical appraisal tool evaluating the reliability and validity of eligible instruments. Finally, we qualitatively summarized results of all included instruments. No ethical approval was required because this systematic review was performed based on published studies. We included 16 eligible studies covering 10 original and 6 revised or modified instruments for the final analysis. The overall quality of all instruments was moderate because test-retest reliability was inadequately examined in most instruments. Of 16 instruments, MDS-revised (MDS-R) was broadly validated and employed in different working or cultural settings. Meanwhile, it also extensively expands to specifically detect MD. Moreover, other instruments including moral distress risk scale (MDSR) and moral distress thermometer (MDT) should be further validated and utilized because it covered the gap missed by most instruments. Although several instruments have been made available for clinical nurses, some of them have inadequate psychometric properties test, especially test-retest reliability evaluation. Meanwhile, most of them have not be validated and employed in other working or cultural settings. We therefore suggested further studies to validate the psychometric properties of existing instruments and then employed instruments with high reliability and validity to detect MD in clinical nurses.https://doi.org/10.1177/0046958021996499
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xu Tian PhD
Yanfei Jin PhD
Hui Chen BSc
María F. Jiménez-Herrera PhD
spellingShingle Xu Tian PhD
Yanfei Jin PhD
Hui Chen BSc
María F. Jiménez-Herrera PhD
Instruments for Detecting Moral Distress in Clinical Nurses: A Systematic Review
Inquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing
author_facet Xu Tian PhD
Yanfei Jin PhD
Hui Chen BSc
María F. Jiménez-Herrera PhD
author_sort Xu Tian PhD
title Instruments for Detecting Moral Distress in Clinical Nurses: A Systematic Review
title_short Instruments for Detecting Moral Distress in Clinical Nurses: A Systematic Review
title_full Instruments for Detecting Moral Distress in Clinical Nurses: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Instruments for Detecting Moral Distress in Clinical Nurses: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Instruments for Detecting Moral Distress in Clinical Nurses: A Systematic Review
title_sort instruments for detecting moral distress in clinical nurses: a systematic review
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Inquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing
issn 0046-9580
1945-7243
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Moral distress (MD) has become a seriously negative problem experienced by healthcare professionals, especially clinical nurses. Early and accurate detection of MD by the validated and reliable instrument is critically important to further develop an effective intervention strategy. We performed the current systematic review to comprehensively summarize the evidence of instruments for the detection of MD in clinical nurses. The research design was a systematic literature review. We assigned 2 investigators to independently search potential studies in PubMed, EMBASE, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) from their inception to June 2020. We used data extraction table extracting essential information, and the modified critical appraisal tool evaluating the reliability and validity of eligible instruments. Finally, we qualitatively summarized results of all included instruments. No ethical approval was required because this systematic review was performed based on published studies. We included 16 eligible studies covering 10 original and 6 revised or modified instruments for the final analysis. The overall quality of all instruments was moderate because test-retest reliability was inadequately examined in most instruments. Of 16 instruments, MDS-revised (MDS-R) was broadly validated and employed in different working or cultural settings. Meanwhile, it also extensively expands to specifically detect MD. Moreover, other instruments including moral distress risk scale (MDSR) and moral distress thermometer (MDT) should be further validated and utilized because it covered the gap missed by most instruments. Although several instruments have been made available for clinical nurses, some of them have inadequate psychometric properties test, especially test-retest reliability evaluation. Meanwhile, most of them have not be validated and employed in other working or cultural settings. We therefore suggested further studies to validate the psychometric properties of existing instruments and then employed instruments with high reliability and validity to detect MD in clinical nurses.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/0046958021996499
work_keys_str_mv AT xutianphd instrumentsfordetectingmoraldistressinclinicalnursesasystematicreview
AT yanfeijinphd instrumentsfordetectingmoraldistressinclinicalnursesasystematicreview
AT huichenbsc instrumentsfordetectingmoraldistressinclinicalnursesasystematicreview
AT mariafjimenezherreraphd instrumentsfordetectingmoraldistressinclinicalnursesasystematicreview
_version_ 1724200735411798016