Mental Files and the Theory of Fiction: A Reply to Zoltán Vecsey

In this work I reply to Zoltán Vecsey’s criticisms of the semantic account of fictional names I put forward in Orlando (2017). The main tenet of that proposal is that fictional names refer to individual concepts, which I understand in terms of mental files. In Vecsey (2020), the author presents thre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Eleonora Orlando
Format: Article
Language:ces
Published: University of Presov, Faculty of Arts 2021-06-01
Series:ESPES
Subjects:
Online Access:https://espes.ff.unipo.sk/index.php/ESPES/article/view/210
id doaj-ad9fd92561644969882961258bafde67
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ad9fd92561644969882961258bafde672021-07-03T10:34:11ZcesUniversity of Presov, Faculty of ArtsESPES1339-11192021-06-011017988184Mental Files and the Theory of Fiction: A Reply to Zoltán VecseyEleonora Orlando0Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas-Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico-CONICET University of Buenos AiresIn this work I reply to Zoltán Vecsey’s criticisms of the semantic account of fictional names I put forward in Orlando (2017). The main tenet of that proposal is that fictional names refer to individual concepts, which I understand in terms of mental files. In Vecsey (2020), the author presents three main objections: (i) no referential shift can be ascribed to fictional names, (ii) fictional names are supposed to play two conflicting functions, and (iii) the mental file framework is incompatible with an antirealist view of fictional objects. Although the objections are deep and thoughtful, the challenge they involve can be met if certain aspects of the proposal are clarified and developed.https://espes.ff.unipo.sk/index.php/ESPES/article/view/210fictional namefictional conceptmental filefictional narrativeantirealism vs. realism about fiction
collection DOAJ
language ces
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eleonora Orlando
spellingShingle Eleonora Orlando
Mental Files and the Theory of Fiction: A Reply to Zoltán Vecsey
ESPES
fictional name
fictional concept
mental file
fictional narrative
antirealism vs. realism about fiction
author_facet Eleonora Orlando
author_sort Eleonora Orlando
title Mental Files and the Theory of Fiction: A Reply to Zoltán Vecsey
title_short Mental Files and the Theory of Fiction: A Reply to Zoltán Vecsey
title_full Mental Files and the Theory of Fiction: A Reply to Zoltán Vecsey
title_fullStr Mental Files and the Theory of Fiction: A Reply to Zoltán Vecsey
title_full_unstemmed Mental Files and the Theory of Fiction: A Reply to Zoltán Vecsey
title_sort mental files and the theory of fiction: a reply to zoltán vecsey
publisher University of Presov, Faculty of Arts
series ESPES
issn 1339-1119
publishDate 2021-06-01
description In this work I reply to Zoltán Vecsey’s criticisms of the semantic account of fictional names I put forward in Orlando (2017). The main tenet of that proposal is that fictional names refer to individual concepts, which I understand in terms of mental files. In Vecsey (2020), the author presents three main objections: (i) no referential shift can be ascribed to fictional names, (ii) fictional names are supposed to play two conflicting functions, and (iii) the mental file framework is incompatible with an antirealist view of fictional objects. Although the objections are deep and thoughtful, the challenge they involve can be met if certain aspects of the proposal are clarified and developed.
topic fictional name
fictional concept
mental file
fictional narrative
antirealism vs. realism about fiction
url https://espes.ff.unipo.sk/index.php/ESPES/article/view/210
work_keys_str_mv AT eleonoraorlando mentalfilesandthetheoryoffictionareplytozoltanvecsey
_version_ 1721321097072214016