Difference Between Intentional and Reactive Movement in Side-Steps: Patterns of Temporal Structure and Force Exertion

Intentional and reactive movements are dissimilar in terms of execution time. Previous studies reported that reactive movements are faster than intentional movements (“Bohr’s law” or “Gunslinger effect”), however, these studies focused only on hand-reaching tasks, such as pressing buttons. No studie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tsubasa Wakatsuki, Norimasa Yamada
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02186/full
id doaj-ad99ab9a74814e22875afa2797668891
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ad99ab9a74814e22875afa27976688912020-11-25T01:58:47ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-09-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.02186534882Difference Between Intentional and Reactive Movement in Side-Steps: Patterns of Temporal Structure and Force ExertionTsubasa Wakatsuki0Norimasa Yamada1Graduate School of Health and Sport Sciences, Chukyo University, Toyota, JapanSchool of Health and Sport Sciences, Chukyo University, Toyota, JapanIntentional and reactive movements are dissimilar in terms of execution time. Previous studies reported that reactive movements are faster than intentional movements (“Bohr’s law” or “Gunslinger effect”), however, these studies focused only on hand-reaching tasks, such as pressing buttons. No studies assessed whole-body movements involving movement of the center of mass (CoM). This movement is characterized by many degrees of freedom because it involves many joints and requires more force than the hand-reaching movement. In this study, we determined the differences in the patterns of temporal structure and force exertion to elucidate the mechanism of “Bohr’s law” in whole-body movement involving movement of the CoM. Ten participants performed a sidestepping task, which requires at least two steps: (1) an intentional movement, in which the movement started with the participants’ own timing; and (2) a reactive movement, in which the movement started the moment a light-emitting diode bulb in front of the participants lit up. We collected data on the ground reaction forces and coordinates of 20 body points. The time of movement onset was calculated and defined based on the ground reaction force, which has the earliest onset compared with velocity and position. The execution time was significantly shorter in the reactive movement condition than in the intentional movement condition (772 vs. 715 ms, p = 2.9 × 10–4). We confirmed that Bohr’s law was applicable not only in hand-reaching tasks but also in whole-body movement. Moreover, we identified three phases, including the velocity reversal phenomenon associated with the produced mechanism of Bohr’s law, and provided the temporal structure. The difference in the pattern of force exertion accompanying the two styles of motor planning with different accuracies was strongly associated with this motor characteristic. These findings may serve as important basic data to scientifically clarify the mechanism of complex physical tactics implemented in one-on-one dueling in various sports.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02186/fullinternally initiated movementexternally triggered movementwhole bodykineticsonset timemovement time
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tsubasa Wakatsuki
Norimasa Yamada
spellingShingle Tsubasa Wakatsuki
Norimasa Yamada
Difference Between Intentional and Reactive Movement in Side-Steps: Patterns of Temporal Structure and Force Exertion
Frontiers in Psychology
internally initiated movement
externally triggered movement
whole body
kinetics
onset time
movement time
author_facet Tsubasa Wakatsuki
Norimasa Yamada
author_sort Tsubasa Wakatsuki
title Difference Between Intentional and Reactive Movement in Side-Steps: Patterns of Temporal Structure and Force Exertion
title_short Difference Between Intentional and Reactive Movement in Side-Steps: Patterns of Temporal Structure and Force Exertion
title_full Difference Between Intentional and Reactive Movement in Side-Steps: Patterns of Temporal Structure and Force Exertion
title_fullStr Difference Between Intentional and Reactive Movement in Side-Steps: Patterns of Temporal Structure and Force Exertion
title_full_unstemmed Difference Between Intentional and Reactive Movement in Side-Steps: Patterns of Temporal Structure and Force Exertion
title_sort difference between intentional and reactive movement in side-steps: patterns of temporal structure and force exertion
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Intentional and reactive movements are dissimilar in terms of execution time. Previous studies reported that reactive movements are faster than intentional movements (“Bohr’s law” or “Gunslinger effect”), however, these studies focused only on hand-reaching tasks, such as pressing buttons. No studies assessed whole-body movements involving movement of the center of mass (CoM). This movement is characterized by many degrees of freedom because it involves many joints and requires more force than the hand-reaching movement. In this study, we determined the differences in the patterns of temporal structure and force exertion to elucidate the mechanism of “Bohr’s law” in whole-body movement involving movement of the CoM. Ten participants performed a sidestepping task, which requires at least two steps: (1) an intentional movement, in which the movement started with the participants’ own timing; and (2) a reactive movement, in which the movement started the moment a light-emitting diode bulb in front of the participants lit up. We collected data on the ground reaction forces and coordinates of 20 body points. The time of movement onset was calculated and defined based on the ground reaction force, which has the earliest onset compared with velocity and position. The execution time was significantly shorter in the reactive movement condition than in the intentional movement condition (772 vs. 715 ms, p = 2.9 × 10–4). We confirmed that Bohr’s law was applicable not only in hand-reaching tasks but also in whole-body movement. Moreover, we identified three phases, including the velocity reversal phenomenon associated with the produced mechanism of Bohr’s law, and provided the temporal structure. The difference in the pattern of force exertion accompanying the two styles of motor planning with different accuracies was strongly associated with this motor characteristic. These findings may serve as important basic data to scientifically clarify the mechanism of complex physical tactics implemented in one-on-one dueling in various sports.
topic internally initiated movement
externally triggered movement
whole body
kinetics
onset time
movement time
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02186/full
work_keys_str_mv AT tsubasawakatsuki differencebetweenintentionalandreactivemovementinsidestepspatternsoftemporalstructureandforceexertion
AT norimasayamada differencebetweenintentionalandreactivemovementinsidestepspatternsoftemporalstructureandforceexertion
_version_ 1724968191067684864