Barriers and Recommendations to Innovative Ownership Models for Wind Power

Local ownership models have proven to be an important way to avoid local resistance to onshore wind turbines. As wind power expands into onshore and nearshore wind farms, such ownership models become of increasing importance, while also undergoing further development. This paper uses the Choice Awar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Louise Krog, Karl Sperling, Henrik Lund
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-09-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/10/2602
id doaj-ad90f71ffd2d42e8b23feff4185dfdd9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ad90f71ffd2d42e8b23feff4185dfdd92020-11-25T02:26:03ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732018-09-011110260210.3390/en11102602en11102602Barriers and Recommendations to Innovative Ownership Models for Wind PowerLouise Krog0Karl Sperling1Henrik Lund2Department of Planning, Aalborg University, Rendsburggade 14, 9000 Aalborg, DenmarkDepartment of Planning, Aalborg University, Rendsburggade 14, 9000 Aalborg, DenmarkDepartment of Planning, Aalborg University, Rendsburggade 14, 9000 Aalborg, DenmarkLocal ownership models have proven to be an important way to avoid local resistance to onshore wind turbines. As wind power expands into onshore and nearshore wind farms, such ownership models become of increasing importance, while also undergoing further development. This paper uses the Choice Awareness theory to examine some of the barriers connected to the implementation of these new ownership models and presents recommendations to overcome such barriers. Choice Awareness addresses societal aspects (discourse, socioeconomics, and public regulation) mainly related to implementing alternatives to existing technologies. For the theory to be able to embrace the complexity of the transition of the energy system more holistically, we explore and specify the organizational dimension of choice-eliminating mechanisms. Based on the case of an NGO’s attempt to bid for a tender for nearshore wind turbines, it is shown how the central administration prevents new innovative ownership models from entering the tender. A strong path dependency has led to a conscious or unconscious elimination of projects based on organizational structures that do not fit the definition of large energy companies. As a result of this, the paper makes three recommendations for policy changes with the aim to secure equal possibilities for actors involved in nearshore wind power tenders.http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/10/2602energy policylocal ownershipchoice awarenessnearshore wind
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Louise Krog
Karl Sperling
Henrik Lund
spellingShingle Louise Krog
Karl Sperling
Henrik Lund
Barriers and Recommendations to Innovative Ownership Models for Wind Power
Energies
energy policy
local ownership
choice awareness
nearshore wind
author_facet Louise Krog
Karl Sperling
Henrik Lund
author_sort Louise Krog
title Barriers and Recommendations to Innovative Ownership Models for Wind Power
title_short Barriers and Recommendations to Innovative Ownership Models for Wind Power
title_full Barriers and Recommendations to Innovative Ownership Models for Wind Power
title_fullStr Barriers and Recommendations to Innovative Ownership Models for Wind Power
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and Recommendations to Innovative Ownership Models for Wind Power
title_sort barriers and recommendations to innovative ownership models for wind power
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2018-09-01
description Local ownership models have proven to be an important way to avoid local resistance to onshore wind turbines. As wind power expands into onshore and nearshore wind farms, such ownership models become of increasing importance, while also undergoing further development. This paper uses the Choice Awareness theory to examine some of the barriers connected to the implementation of these new ownership models and presents recommendations to overcome such barriers. Choice Awareness addresses societal aspects (discourse, socioeconomics, and public regulation) mainly related to implementing alternatives to existing technologies. For the theory to be able to embrace the complexity of the transition of the energy system more holistically, we explore and specify the organizational dimension of choice-eliminating mechanisms. Based on the case of an NGO’s attempt to bid for a tender for nearshore wind turbines, it is shown how the central administration prevents new innovative ownership models from entering the tender. A strong path dependency has led to a conscious or unconscious elimination of projects based on organizational structures that do not fit the definition of large energy companies. As a result of this, the paper makes three recommendations for policy changes with the aim to secure equal possibilities for actors involved in nearshore wind power tenders.
topic energy policy
local ownership
choice awareness
nearshore wind
url http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/10/2602
work_keys_str_mv AT louisekrog barriersandrecommendationstoinnovativeownershipmodelsforwindpower
AT karlsperling barriersandrecommendationstoinnovativeownershipmodelsforwindpower
AT henriklund barriersandrecommendationstoinnovativeownershipmodelsforwindpower
_version_ 1724848736070270976