‘Failed’ or resilient subaltern communities? Pacific indigenous social protection systems in a neoliberal world

The notion of failed state is based on culturally, historically and ideologically slanted lenses and tends to rank post-colonial societies at the lower end of the Failed State Index (FSI). Likewise, the Social Protection Index (SPI) uses neoliberal and Western-based variables and tends to disadvanta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Steven Ratuva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pacific Media Centre 2014-12-01
Series:Pacific Journalism Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/165
id doaj-ad8a00ffe3754f4cb4713528cbce8167
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ad8a00ffe3754f4cb4713528cbce81672020-11-25T02:58:47ZengPacific Media CentrePacific Journalism Review1023-94992324-20352014-12-0120210.24135/pjr.v20i2.165‘Failed’ or resilient subaltern communities? Pacific indigenous social protection systems in a neoliberal worldSteven RatuvaThe notion of failed state is based on culturally, historically and ideologically slanted lenses and tends to rank post-colonial societies at the lower end of the Failed State Index (FSI). Likewise, the Social Protection Index (SPI) uses neoliberal and Western-based variables and tends to disadvantage subaltern post-colonial communities as in the Pacific. This article reverses this trend by arguing for a re-examination of the factors which shape the resilience and adaptability of local communities, something which has always been ignored by mainstream classificatory schemas such as the FSI and SPI. To this end, the article examines the indigenous and local human security and social protection systems in the Pacific and how these provide support mechanisms for community resilience and adaptation in the face of a predatory neoliberal onslaught and globalisation. It focuses on kinship, reciprocity, communal obligation and communal labour as examples of social protection mechanisms in four case studies—Fiji, Samoa, Kiribati and Vanuatu. Of significance here is the role of critical and progressive journalists and media in deconstructing the ideological and cultural bias embedded in these discourses.https://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/165community engagementfailed statesglobalisationindigenoussocial protection
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Steven Ratuva
spellingShingle Steven Ratuva
‘Failed’ or resilient subaltern communities? Pacific indigenous social protection systems in a neoliberal world
Pacific Journalism Review
community engagement
failed states
globalisation
indigenous
social protection
author_facet Steven Ratuva
author_sort Steven Ratuva
title ‘Failed’ or resilient subaltern communities? Pacific indigenous social protection systems in a neoliberal world
title_short ‘Failed’ or resilient subaltern communities? Pacific indigenous social protection systems in a neoliberal world
title_full ‘Failed’ or resilient subaltern communities? Pacific indigenous social protection systems in a neoliberal world
title_fullStr ‘Failed’ or resilient subaltern communities? Pacific indigenous social protection systems in a neoliberal world
title_full_unstemmed ‘Failed’ or resilient subaltern communities? Pacific indigenous social protection systems in a neoliberal world
title_sort ‘failed’ or resilient subaltern communities? pacific indigenous social protection systems in a neoliberal world
publisher Pacific Media Centre
series Pacific Journalism Review
issn 1023-9499
2324-2035
publishDate 2014-12-01
description The notion of failed state is based on culturally, historically and ideologically slanted lenses and tends to rank post-colonial societies at the lower end of the Failed State Index (FSI). Likewise, the Social Protection Index (SPI) uses neoliberal and Western-based variables and tends to disadvantage subaltern post-colonial communities as in the Pacific. This article reverses this trend by arguing for a re-examination of the factors which shape the resilience and adaptability of local communities, something which has always been ignored by mainstream classificatory schemas such as the FSI and SPI. To this end, the article examines the indigenous and local human security and social protection systems in the Pacific and how these provide support mechanisms for community resilience and adaptation in the face of a predatory neoliberal onslaught and globalisation. It focuses on kinship, reciprocity, communal obligation and communal labour as examples of social protection mechanisms in four case studies—Fiji, Samoa, Kiribati and Vanuatu. Of significance here is the role of critical and progressive journalists and media in deconstructing the ideological and cultural bias embedded in these discourses.
topic community engagement
failed states
globalisation
indigenous
social protection
url https://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/165
work_keys_str_mv AT stevenratuva failedorresilientsubalterncommunitiespacificindigenoussocialprotectionsystemsinaneoliberalworld
_version_ 1724705122193244160